Search results

I’ve posted a link to this article before. https://philosophynow.org/issues/105/Pacifism_Is_Not_Passivism Giving @Wrangler the benefit of the doubt, he doesn’t understand the concept of pacifism, as he demonstrated once again in post #2006. He’s not alone, but it doesn’t have to be that way...

You’ve completely mischaracterized followers of Jesus who obey his teaching concerning how to treat our enemies.

No weapon of the world is needed for a follower of Jesus to do justice. Christian history proves it.

“Some Christians spend more time defending their political tribe than proclaiming the Gospel. That should alarm us. Christ did not command us to make disciples of a party. He commanded us to make disciples of the nations.” - Scott Roberts

I woke up this morning with “suffering” on my mind. You mentioned on Saturday past that Spurgeon is one of your favorite Christian authors. “Men will never become great in theology until they become great in suffering. Said Luther, ‘Affliction is the best book in my library.’” - C.H. Spurgeon...

I think Friel is right about these kinds of stories. What about you?

From my X / Twitter “Following” feed this evening - https://x.com/drfrankturek/status/2053965875364118694?s=61 ”Jesus was no warlord. Muhammad, of course, was.” @Wrangler you expressed enthusiasm for warmongers / warmongering in this thread. What is the difference, if any, in your mind...

* Always. A factor in deciding to read a book or not? Sometimes. *