Search results

All is said is that the NIV doesn’t translate the elohim of Israel as the Gods of Israel, which anyone who reads the NIV can clearly see for themselves.

My point is that you used words that express modalism and then denied that you are speaking about modalism. When I then asked what you are speaking about you replied that the words speak for themselves.

The NIV doesn’t translate the elohim of Israel as the Gods of Israel. This is easily confirmed by consulting any verse of your choosing.

The words are classical expressions of modalism.

* I wonder what kind of mpg (miles per goat) he was able to get out of that thing. *

“It is one thing to be ignorant, and another thing to be unwilling to know.” - Augustine

* Evolution Healthcare. Hmm. Survival of the fittest philosophy, I reckon. *

Thanks. I haven’t seen a new edition of the NIV but I’ll keep an eye out for it. If it does render elohim as “Gods” when referring to the God of Israel it will be highly publicized and heavily criticized by Hebrew linguists and by monotheists. It would be scandalous, and that is putting it...

Then what?

I’m currently reading The Parent Revolution: Rescuing Your Kids from the Radicals Ruining Our Schools, written by Corey A. DeAngelis. An amendment to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to allow school choice is being voted on in a couple of weeks.

* The dull one has a good point. *

* I don’t run. If you ever see me running you had better run too. *