Search results

That’s right. What you haven’t grasped is that the Roman Catholic Church isn’t the early Christian Church.

I’ve never said that the teaching of the apostles isn’t binding on me. I assert and affirm that it is. You jump the track with the Roman Catholic doctrine of apostolic succession.

The Church compromised with the Roman Empire.

I don’t.

None of them are Roman Catholic.

Yes. Jesus is a Jew. The apostles are Jews, not Roman Catholics. The early church is comprised of Jews, not Roman Catholics.

Listen to Jesus.

Welcome to the forums. This is one of the two best threads on the Trinity, and there are dozens of them. How, and why, do you want it to be shorter?

Finished An Answer To The Jews and To Scapula, both by Tertullian; Assumption of Moses (a Jewish writing) in response to an inquiry. Started Tertullian’s Against Hermogenes. Is anyone else on the forums currently reading any of the Church Fathers?

Brace yourself.

The apostles.

Agreed.

Not according to at least one of your fellow Catholics. There’s no need for sorrow. All I’ve ever asked is that you tell me what you think / believe and why you think / believe it.

Confirmation. See post #2. Yes.

Okay. You, a Roman Catholic, believe the Roman Catholic Church doesn’t recognize Vatican 2. I, a non-Roman Catholic, believe the Roman Catholic Church recognizes Vatican 2. What you and I have in common is that neither one of us believes Vatican 2 is binding on us. I believe Vatican 2 is...

You seriously believe the RCC doesn’t recognize Vatican 2?

The Messiah’s God and Father.

God’s will done on earth = God’s will done in heaven. Which of the 21 I listed isn’t recognized by the Roman Catholic Church?

Thanks. KJV is so archaic. “Blood of the covenant” better conveys what Matthew wrote.