Sad part is, you as well as premillennialist claim "Thousand Years" is literal earthly time "It's Not"
It states thousand years expires, it's not literal time on this earth as you claim
To go a step farther you claim (First Resurrection) is interpreted as those who partake in the Lord's resurrection 2,000 years ago, when the scripture puts it in the future at the symbolic end of this non-literal thousand years, at the time of the end
Your claim and interpretation that (First Resurrection) seen below was that if Jesus Christ is Laughable
Revelation 20:5KJV
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
Really?....
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him
a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till
the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ
a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until
the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him
a thousand years.
7 And when
the thousand years are expired...
Where does it say in the passage that
A/THE thousand years is not really
A/THE thousand years?