@Aunty Jane, @Eternally Grateful, @BeyondET, @BlessedPeace and @rwb, you'd better read the opening post.
A heretical teaching dismantled with the help of Paul the Evangelist.
- Thread starter Sigma
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
BlessedPeace
Well-Known Member
It has long been known that Catholics do not proselytize.
Catholics also do not engage in an Online campaign dedicated to insulting Protestant tradition.
Catholics also do not engage in an Online campaign dedicated to insulting Protestant tradition.
face2face
Well-Known Member
- Jun 22, 2015
- 4,867
- 657
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
The counter reformation has been at work in the RCC since 1517! and has only increased in her intensity of recent decades.
It's an impossible position to insult from.Catholics also do not engage in an Online campaign dedicated to insulting Protestant tradition.
F2F
The flaw in your believing James of the four "siblings" of Jesus in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 and apostle James in Gal. 1:19 were the same person is that the latter was one of the Twelve, which means that he could've only been either James of Zebedee or James of Alphaeus, and neither of them were a son of Joseph and Mary.
Therefore, I've proven the belief that Joseph, Simon, James, and Judas (Jude/Thaddeus) in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 were Jesus's siblings to be false using Scripture alone. If you continue to repeat it as true, then I'll continue to challenge you to refute the evidence to the contrary in the opening post. If you had a sliver of conviction in your belief, you'd attempt to try.
- Dec 31, 2010
- 5,200
- 2,400
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother. - Galatians 1:19
54 And when he was come into his own country, he taught them in their synagogue, insomuch that they were astonished, and said, Whence hath this man this wisdom, and these mighty works?
55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?
56 And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?
57 And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house. - Matthew 13
I believe Mary was a virgin at the time of the birth of her son Jesus. And also that they had a family together afterwards.
54 And when he was come into his own country, he taught them in their synagogue, insomuch that they were astonished, and said, Whence hath this man this wisdom, and these mighty works?
55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?
56 And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?
57 And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house. - Matthew 13
I believe Mary was a virgin at the time of the birth of her son Jesus. And also that they had a family together afterwards.
Your belief has been proven false, and rather than acknowledge it, or at least attempt to refute if you possessed a sliver of conviction, you talk about blogs lol
The flaw in your believing James of the four "siblings" of Jesus in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 and apostle James in Gal. 1:19 were the same person is that the latter was one of the Twelve, which means that he could've only been either James of Zebedee or James of Alphaeus, and neither of them were a son of Joseph and Mary.
Therefore, I've proven the belief that Joseph, Simon, James, and Judas (Jude/Thaddeus) in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 were Jesus's siblings to be false using Scripture alone. If you continue to repeat it as true, then I'll continue to challenge you to refute the evidence to the contrary in the opening post. If you had a sliver of conviction in your belief, you'd attempt to try.
- Dec 31, 2010
- 5,200
- 2,400
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
The existence of other people who shared the name "Joseph", "Simon", "James", and "Judas" doesn't change the fact you claim that specifically Joseph, Simon, James, and Judas (Jude/Thaddeus) in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 were Jesus's siblings, as well as that James of those four and apostle James in Gal. 1:19 were the same person.
The flaw in your believing James of the four "siblings" of Jesus in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 and apostle James in Gal. 1:19 were the same person is that the latter was one of the Twelve, which means that he could've only been either James of Zebedee or James of Alphaeus, and neither of them were a son of Joseph and Mary.
Therefore, I've proven the belief that Joseph, Simon, James, and Judas (Jude/Thaddeus) in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 were Jesus's siblings to be false using Scripture alone.
BlessedPeace
Well-Known Member
The Contrareformatio ran from 1545 c. 1700c.
This might assist you.
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!
www.dictionary.com
Yet,you all still try.
face2face
Well-Known Member
- Jun 22, 2015
- 4,867
- 657
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
No it's still in action and will be till the Lord's coming.The Contrareformatio ran from 1545 c. 1700c.
This might assist you.
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!
Yet,you all still try.
BlessedPeace
Well-Known Member
Just a word of advice here. No non-Catholic will ever persuade a Catholic to stop believing what their church has instilled.
Many have been influenced by the church since infancy sprinkling in that church. And
more so if they attended Catholic school.
Their faith is in the church.Which they believe is a conflation with God.
Many have been influenced by the church since infancy sprinkling in that church. And
more so if they attended Catholic school.
Their faith is in the church.Which they believe is a conflation with God.
BlessedPeace
Well-Known Member
Untrue.
Repeating the same behavior expecting a different result seems to be the norm here. I'm intending to stop that behavior on my part.
If they were Jesus's siblings, they wouldn't have been full siblings, but rather half-siblings, as they wouldn't have shared Joseph as a father. However, again, as I said in post #15:
"The flaw in your believing James of the four "siblings" of Jesus in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 and apostle James in Gal. 1:19 were the same person is that the latter was one of the Twelve, which means that he could've only been either James of Zebedee or James of Alphaeus, and neither of them were a son of Joseph and Mary.
Therefore, I've proven the belief that Joseph, Simon, James, and Judas (Jude/Thaddeus) in Matt. 13:55/Mk. 6:3 were Jesus's siblings to be false using Scripture alone."
I have yet to receive an answer from you to my question in post #12 as well.
Last edited:
BlessedPeace
Well-Known Member
I have,repeatedly in other threads where you belabor the point,and now in this one where you insist Paul helps you make it.
You think to create a soapbox where you can proclaim false doctrine is true,while gaining satisfaction arguing,often childishly, with those who know better.
Which communicate
clearly that you know very little ,or you would set a better example.
My final reply.
No, you haven't addressed the opening post.
You know better? If that were true, you could refute the opening post, but you can't, which is why you haven't even attempted.
face2face
Well-Known Member
- Jun 22, 2015
- 4,867
- 657
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
