A Scriptural Refutation of Unconditional Election

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

LoveYeshua

Active Member
Sep 25, 2024
530
159
43
Quebec
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada


Predestination and Divine Justice: A Scriptural Refutation of Unconditional Election


Abstract


This article challenges the doctrine of unconditional predestination as articulated in post-Augustinian and Reformed theology, which asserts that God has decreed from eternity the salvation of some and the reprobation of others. By re-centering the theological conversation on the person and teachings of Jesus Christ, the prophetic voice of the Old Testament, and the apostolic instruction of the original disciples, this study argues that divine election in Scripture is never presented as arbitrary or irresistible. Instead, Scripture affirms God's universal salvific will, human freedom, and moral responsibility. The doctrine of predestination, when interpreted apart from God's justice, mercy, and revealed will in Christ, is a distortion of the gospel and incompatible with the nature of God as presented in the entirety of the biblical canon.


I. Introduction: The Crisis of Divine Character in the Doctrine of Predestination


Predestination—particularly in its Augustinian, Calvinist, and supralapsarian forms—has long been a source of theological division. At the heart of the doctrine lies a view of God's sovereignty that elevates divine will over all other attributes, including justice, love, and mercy. According to this view, God has eternally and immutably decreed who will be saved and who will be damned, apart from any foreseen faith, repentance, or human cooperation. This view, often labeled unconditional election, stands in tension with the consistent scriptural witness that affirms God's impartiality, universal invitation to salvation, and the real possibility of human response or rejection.


This article contends that such deterministic theology, while drawn from selective interpretations of Paul, contradicts the teachings of Jesus Christ, the law and the prophets, and the apostolic witness of the Eleven. It also violates the moral intelligibility of divine judgment and redefines grace into a coercive force rather than an unearned yet freely accepted gift.


II. The Limited Scope of the Word “Predestination” in Scripture


The Greek term proorizō (προορίζω), meaning "to predetermine" or "to foreordain," occurs only six times in the New Testament, and always within the Pauline corpus: Romans 8:29–30; Romans 9:23; 1 Corinthians 2:7; Ephesians 1:5, 11. There are no occurrences of the term in the Gospels, Acts (aside from Paul’s own usage), or the general epistles of Peter, James, John, or Jude.


Even within Paul's usage, the concept is linked directly to foreknowledge (prognōsis, πρόγνωσις), as in Romans 8:29: “For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son.” Foreknowledge, in this context, does not imply mechanical determinism but an omniscient anticipation of those who would respond to grace freely. The emphasis is on conformity to Christ—not arbitrary election to salvation irrespective of faith or obedience.


Furthermore, in Romans 11:20–23, Paul undercuts deterministic readings when he states that Israel’s branches were broken off due to unbelief and could be grafted in again through faith. The conditional nature of election—“if they do not continue in unbelief”—demonstrates that divine inclusion is responsive, not static or fated.


III. The Teachings of Jesus Christ: Universality of the Gospel Call


Jesus Christ, as the incarnate Logos and perfect image of the Father (John 1:14; Hebrews 1:3), must be the hermeneutical center of all theological reflection. Jesus' teachings reject any notion of fixed, pre-temporal reprobation or irresistible grace. Instead, He constantly presents salvation as a response to God’s call that each person is free to accept or reject.


  • “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28)
  • “Whoever desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me” (Mark 8:34)
  • “If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink” (John 7:37)
  • “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16)
  • “And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself” (John 12:32)

The repetition of universal language—“all,” “whoever,” “anyone”—directly challenges any doctrine that restricts God’s grace to a select few. These are not mere rhetorical flourishes; they reveal the divine intent. The universality of the call is consistent with the character of God as revealed by Jesus: impartial, compassionate, and desiring the salvation of all.


The parables of the kingdom (Matthew 13, 22, 25) further demonstrate that entry into the kingdom is open to many, yet contingent upon readiness, obedience, and faith. In the Parable of the Sower, four types of soil receive the same seed, yet only one produces lasting fruit. The difference lies not in divine decree, but in human response.


IV. The Prophetic Witness and Covenantal Freedom


The Hebrew Scriptures provide foundational testimony against the idea of irreversible, predetermined fate. The prophets consistently affirm that God calls all people to repentance and gives real choices with real consequences.


  • “I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:19)
  • “Turn, turn from your evil ways! For why should you die, O house of Israel?” (Ezekiel 33:11)
  • “Seek the Lord while He may be found, call upon Him while He is near” (Isaiah 55:6)

These appeals would be nonsensical if God's audience lacked the capacity to respond freely. The entire structure of covenant theology—blessings for obedience and curses for rebellion—presupposes moral agency and rejects the fatalism of predestination. Even Nineveh, a Gentile city, is spared upon repentance, showing that God’s will is not fixed in wrath but open to mercy (Jonah 3:10).


The nature of God as slow to anger, abundant in mercy, and not willing that any should perish (cf. Psalm 86:15; 2 Peter 3:9) is foundational to the Old Testament. To deny this universal mercy is to deny the consistency of God's character across redemptive history.


V. The Apostolic Witness of the Eleven


Beyond Paul, the apostolic epistles affirm God’s impartial offer of salvation and the necessity of human response:


  • Peter: “God shows no partiality. But in every nation whoever fears Him and works righteousness is accepted by Him” (Acts 10:34–35).
  • “The Lord is… not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9).
  • James: “Each one is tempted when he is drawn away by his own desires… Then, when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin” (James 1:14–15). This shows personal moral responsibility.
  • John: “Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God” (1 John 5:1).
  • “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us” (1 John 1:9).
  • “Whoever desires, let him take the water of life freely” (Revelation 22:17).

The repeated emphasis on whoever, everyone, any, and all undermines the Calvinistic notion of limited atonement and particular grace. The apostles who walked with Jesus never once taught unconditional election. They continued His message of personal repentance, faith, and obedience.


cont. next post​

 

LoveYeshua

Active Member
Sep 25, 2024
530
159
43
Quebec
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada

VI. Theological Implications and Ethical Concerns


The deterministic model of predestination introduces serious theological problems:


  1. Incompatibility with Divine Justice and Love
    If God predestines individuals to eternal damnation without regard to their will or works, then divine justice becomes arbitrary. Scripture affirms that God will judge “each one according to his deeds” (Romans 2:6). But this judgment only has moral meaning if the person had real opportunity to choose.
  2. Erosion of Moral Responsibility
    If salvation and damnation are fixed by decree, then human choice is ultimately powerless. Such a view undermines the entire moral framework of Scripture, from Adam to the final judgment.
  3. The Problem of Evangelism
    Why preach the gospel universally if only the predestined elect can respond? The Great Commission (Matthew 28:18–20) presupposes that all nations can receive the gospel and that human response is real and meaningful.

VII. Rethinking Predestination: Election in Biblical Terms


Biblical election is corporate, dynamic, and conditional. Israel was God’s chosen people, yet repeatedly warned that continued rebellion would lead to rejection (cf. Deuteronomy 28; Hosea 1:9). Jesus chooses disciples, yet says “Did I not choose you, the twelve, and one of you is a devil?” (John 6:70). Judas, though chosen, fell by transgression and was replaced (Acts 1:25). This proves that election does not ensure perseverance apart from faith and obedience.


In Romans 8 and Ephesians 1, predestination is tied to vocation—God’s plan to conform believers into Christ’s image and adopt them as sons. This is not about exclusion from salvation but about the destiny prepared for those who love Him (4).


Conclusion: The Gospel Is For All


The doctrine of unconditional predestination, as historically developed in Reformed systems, lacks support from the teachings of Jesus, the prophets, and the Twelve. It emerges from a narrow reading of Pauline texts, divorced from their full theological context. The totality of Scripture affirms God's desire that all be saved, His call to every person, and the responsibility of each individual to respond.


“Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve” (Joshua 24:15) remains the call of Scripture. Predestination, rightly understood, is not about God's secret decree but about His revealed invitation to eternal life, open to whoever believes.




Bibliography


  1. The Holy Bible, New King James Version.
  2. Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. T&T Clark, 1956.
  3. Olson, Roger E. Against Calvinism. Zondervan, 2011.
  4. Pinnock, Clark H. The Grace of God, the Will of Man: A Case for Arminianism. Zondervan, 1989.
  5. Wright, N. T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Fortress Press, 2013.
  6. Sanders, John. The God Who Risks: A Theology of Divine Providence. IVP Academic, 1998.