Anyone accusing you of “Replacement Theology” is defending the spirit of Antichrist.

[The Gospel of Christ]

Anyone accusing you of “Replacement Theology” is (knowingly or not), defending the spirit of Antichrist.

Why?

Because what they’re really saying is:

1. “Jesus did not fulfill the covenant with Israel.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy.)
They believe the Old Covenant is still active for ethnic Jews, which means Christ’s fulfillment was incomplete.

But Jesus said:
“It is finished.” — John 19:30
Not postponed. Not paused. Finished.

2. “The Messiah’s work wasn’t enough, and Jesus failed the first time.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy.)
This is a direct assault on the power and finality of the cross. It denies Hebrews 10:14:
“By one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.”

They imply that the cross didn’t fully accomplish redemption for Israel — as if God hit “pause” and still owes something to a group of unbelieving ethnic Jews, the vast majority of whom are not even Semitic. They are Gentile converts from Eastern Europe and Russia — Khazar descendants — who now make up over 95% of the population in modern Rothschild’s False Israel™. This fact has been documented by Jewish historian Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe and further confirmed by Israeli professor Smo Sand in The Invention of the Jewish People. Both men — recognized as Jews within Zionist society — exposed that the overwhelming majority of modern Israelis are NOT blood descendants of Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob, but are instead the product of an 8th century, medieval mass conversion from the Turkic Khazar empire.

Which means this:
The constant accusation of “antisemitism” against Christians who reject Antichrist Zionist theology is not only false — it is deliberate, weaponized gaslighting. You cannot be “antisemitic” for confronting a religious and political system built by non-Semitic impostors who reject the Messiah and pervert the Gospel.

3. “There’s still another plan for real ethnic Jews (if you can actually find one) and their converts… apart from faith in Christ.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy that completely contradicts the Gospel.)
This is a second path to salvation — a theology Paul explicitly condemns as another gospel (Galatians 1:6–9).

Acts 4:12: “There is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
There is no “Plan B” for Christ-rejecting Israel.

4. “There are two peoples of God — Israel and the Church — with two separate destinies.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy that denies the Son.)
This splits what Christ made one. It contradicts Ephesians 2:14–16 and turns the Body of Christ into a temporary “parenthesis” instead of the prophetic fulfillment.

Ephesians 2:14:
“He has made the two one... breaking down the wall of separation.”
Christ demolished the wall.
Scofield’s theology builds it back up — brick by brick.
Dispensationalist doctrine doesn’t fulfill the Gospel — it reverses it.
What Jesus united, they divide.

5. “Jesus came to offer the Kingdom to Israel, but they rejected it — so now He’s coming back to finish what He couldn’t do the first time.”
This portrays Christ’s first coming as a failure, His death on the cross as meaningless, and the Church as a divine afterthought — a backup plan until the “real” plan with ethnic Israel can resume.
It is not prophecy.
It is total blasphemy — a doctrine of demons, dressed in eschatological drag.

Matthew 21:43: “The kingdom will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruit.”
Jesus didn’t fail. Israel did.

What they preach is Antichrist doctrine — by the Bible’s own definition.
Jesus didn’t teach it.
Paul didn’t teach it.
Peter didn’t.
John didn’t.
Jude didn’t.
Not one Apostle taught it.
No Church Father believed it — for 1,850 years of Christian history.
They would’ve called it the doctrine of demons, a synagogue of Satan theology, and a damnable heresy designed to divide the Body of Christ, resurrect a covenant God made obsolete, and crown a Christ-rejecting nation in place of the crucified King. They would’ve exposed it as a counter-Gospel, birthed from pride, weaponized through empire, and driven by the same Antichrist spirit that crucified the Lord of Glory.

1 John 2:22
“Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the Antichrist — the one who denies the Father and the Son.”

To deny that Jesus is the full and final fulfillment of God's covenant with Israel is to deny Christ Himself.

Let’s Be Clear:
Dispensationalist Evangelicalism doesn’t just add to the Gospel —
It subtracts Christ from Israel’s promises.

That’s not “another perspective.”
That’s another gospel.
Which Paul says is anathema (Galatians 1:6–9).

So yes — in plain terms:
If you reject that Jesus is Israel’s Messiah,
and claim there’s still a covenant apart from Him,
then you are following an Antichrist theology and doctrine —
and your eternal life is in jeopardy, because you are rejecting the Son and provoking the wrath of God.

Their dangerous theology teaches:
The Old Covenant is still open
Jesus Christ was a failure
The cross was not final
The Church is just a temporary detour
Ethnic identity (and apparently that of millions of Gentile converts) equals divine favor
Christ is not the only way — at least not for Jews

That’s not Christianity.
That’s not biblical.
That’s Antichrist theology, plain and simple.

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

Church Father Testimony:

Justin Martyr (c. 160 AD):
“The true spiritual Israel… are we who have been led to God through this crucified Christ.”
(Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 11)

Cyprian of Carthage (c. 250 AD)
A Church Father martyred for the faith, bishop of Carthage:
“Whoever believes in Christ is found to be of the seed of Abraham, and inherits the promise. The Jews, therefore, who were before, have ceased to be.” — Treatise 12, Book 1, par. 16

It doesn’t get more explicit than: “The Jews… have ceased to be.”
This confirms: The Church is Israel now. The Old has passed. The New has come.

And scripture agrees:

Romans 2:28–29
“For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly… but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit…”
Galatians 3:29
“If you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
Romans 9:6–8
“For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel… it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise.”
Hebrews 8:13
“In speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete. And what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.”
Ephesians 2:14–16
“For He Himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier… by setting aside in His flesh the law with its commands and regulations.”

This isn’t “Replacement Theology” —
It’s Fulfillment Theology, straight from the mouth of Christ and the featherpens of His apostles.

The Old Covenant is dead.
The New has come.
And the Church — the Body of Christ — is now the Israel of God. (Galatians 6:16)

Irenaeus (c. 180 AD):
“They who boast themselves as being the house of Jacob and the people of Israel are disinherited from the grace of God.”

Tertullian (c. 197 AD)
“We are they who have been foretold as about to believe in God and be justified by faith, and who are called the children of Abraham through the like faith… Therefore, as the heretics justly reproach us with being 'no longer Jews,' we say in reply: Yes — we are the true Jews, for we are the heirs of the faith.” — An Answer to the Jews, ch. 3

Yes, you didn't read that wrong — Tertullian is saying Christians are the “true Jews," the spiritual and covenantal Israel, under the New Covenant in Christ. He is not saying Christians become ethnic Jews, but that they become what a Jew was always meant to be: one in covenant with God, justified by faith, and a child of Abraham by promise. In the early Church, especially during the first century, Pharisees and other Law-bound Jews accused Jewish believers in Christ of abandoning Judaism — treating them as traitors for rejecting the Temple, the sacrificial system, and the oral traditions.

But those Jews who followed Christ — including the apostles — didn’t deny their heritage. They redefined it through the lens of fulfillment:

“We haven’t abandoned the covenant — we’re living in its fulfillment. You’re the ones stuck in a dead system that Christ fulfilled and replaced with something better.” (See Hebrews 8:13: “By calling this covenant ‘new,’ he has made the first one obsolete.”)

So yes — true New Covenant Jews are those who follow the King of the Jews — Jesus Christ.
If you can’t see that, it’s not because it’s complicated — it’s because you’re veiled, hardened in unbelief, just like Paul said in 2 Corinthians 3.

This is the same theology preached by:
Paul (Romans 9:6–8, Galatians 3:29)
Justin Martyr (Dialogue with Trypho)
Irenaeus
Cyprian
Augustine
And nearly every early Church Father before Dispensationalism existed.

The early Church knew what Scofield’s brainwashed followers (modern Evangelical Dispensationalists) deny:
The Church is Israel. The Old Covenant is dead. There is no salvation, no inheritance, and no promise outside of Christ. Period.

How Did We Get Here? The Scofield Scam:
It wasn’t prophecy. It was politics.

The Balfour Declaration was British imperialism, not a "divine promise".
The 1948 State of False Israel™ was birthed by secular atheists, funded by Rothschilds, enforced by the UN, and dripping in Freemasonic symbolism.
Meanwhile, Oxford University Press, under Rockefeller influence, mass-published MILLIONS of Scofield’s Zionist-infested "Free Study Bibles" and pumped them into American churches & seminaries like spiritual poison.
What they sold as fulfillment…
Was fabrication.

This wasn’t the return of Israel.
It was the rollout of a global deception —
with C.I. Scofield as the front man, and the Antichrist rabbis as the ghostwriters.

So when someone accuses you of “Replacement Theology”, what they're really saying is - “Jesus wasn’t the Son of God”.
Because that’s what it boils down to.

They’re saying the Messiah failed.
That He didn’t fulfill the covenant.
That God still owes something to a people who reject the Son.

The Rockefellers, Oxford Press, and Scofield did their job well:
They got millions of so-called Christians to think like the same Antichrist Pharisees who crucified Christ —
rejecting the cross, denying the covenant, and clinging to a corpse of a kingdom that's been dead for 2,000 years.

And what do they call this absolute madness?

“Sound doctrine.”

‍

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

So you really embrace that scofield bible guy's commentary???

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

So you really embrace that scofield bible guy's commentary???

No, not at all. But about 80% of the American Church does — and they’re so theologically lost they’re cheering for the same spirit that crucified Christ while marching straight into the gates of Hell.

If you think that's funny, I don't know what to tell you... Get help?

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

You're pretty unhinged today.

Are you like this all the time?

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

You're pretty unhinged today.

Are you like this all the time?

Stop trying to be cute, you're really not good at it.

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

OK, so unhinged all the time it is.

Thanks for the verification on that.

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

OK, so unhinged all the time it is.

Thanks for the verification on that.

Let me know when you can refute a single thing I typed up above.. Use scripture. Until then you've got nothing.
If you think that quoting Jesus Christ and the Apostles is "unhinged" then you've got way bigger problems than me.

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

I don't follow that scofield bible guy's commentary so you're on your own bro man!

 

[Lambano]

Christians ARE now God's people. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. (1 Peter 2:10) Don't let anybody tell you otherwise.

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. (Romans 11:28-29)

I hope everybody understands what is being said here, because Christians have historically committed some horrible acts against the Jews in the name of Jesus Christ. The Jewish people are still God's people and they are loved by God. This has nothing to do with their salvation. This has nothing to do with their faithfulness, but it has EVERYTHING to with God's faithfulness.

We have not "replaced" the Jews as God's people; we have been grafted on to them. If they are our enemies as far as the Gospel is concerned, just remember about how Jesus taught us to treat our enemies

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

Christians ARE now God's people. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. (1 Peter 2:10) Don't let anybody tell you otherwise.

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. (Romans 11:28-29)

I hope everybody understands what is being said here, because Christians have historically committed some horrible acts against the Jews in the name of Jesus Christ. The Jewish people are still God's people and they are loved by God. This has nothing to do with their salvation. This has nothing to do with their faithfulness, but it has EVERYTHING to with God's faithfulness.

We have not "replaced" the Jews as God's people; we have been grafted on to them. If they are our enemies as far as the Gospel is concerned, just remember about how Jesus taught us to treat our enemies

You’re proof that a single misinterpretation — when repeated enough — can become an idol. And sadly, like most dispensationalists, you’re bowing to it.

Let’s walk through your confusion, step by step:

“We have not ‘replaced’ the Jews as God’s people; we have been grafted on to them.”

That’s not what Paul says.

Romans 11 is not about ethnic Jews being the root — Christ is.
The “olive tree” is not national Israel. The root is holy (Rom. 11:16) — it is Christ, the Abrahamic covenant fulfilled in Him (Galatians 3:16).
The natural branches? Unbelieving Jews were cut off. Gentiles were grafted in by faith.

Paul doesn’t say we’re grafted “onto Jews.”
He says we're grafted into the covenant promises fulfilled in Christ.

“The Jewish people are still God's people…”

That’s not what the New Testament teaches.

Romans 9:6–8 says not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel — and it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise.

That means ethnic lineage means absolutely nothing apart from faith in Christ.

You quote Romans 11:28–29, thinking it refers to ethnic Israel's continued chosenness — but Paul is simply explaining why God preserved a remnant (Romans 11:5). A remnant according to election by grace, not ethnic privilege. The irrevocable “gifts and calling” are fulfilled in Christ — not reactivated through a future geopolitical nation-state.

“This has nothing to do with their salvation… but everything to do with God's faithfulness.”

Then you just contradicted the Gospel.

God’s faithfulness IS the fulfillment of salvation in Christ.
Not a sentimental attachment to unbelieving, Christ-rejecting descendants of Khazar converts living in a Rothschild-built nation with an Antichrist flag.

“We’re grafted in, not replacing…”

Let’s get this straight:

The Church doesn’t “replace” Israel.
The Church is Israel — redefined by the cross, purified by faith, made one new man in Christ.
This isn’t “replacement.”
It’s fulfillment.

Ephesians 2:14–16:
“He has made the two one… breaking down the dividing wall…”

But Scofield theology builds that wall back up — and declares Christ's finished work unfinished.

“As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies… but loved on account of the patriarchs…”

Yes — and Paul explains why: so that mercy might come to the Gentiles.
But note — they are enemies of the Gospel.
And enemies of the Gospel are not “God’s chosen” — unless they repent and believe.

You cannot be “God’s people” while rejecting God’s Son.
That is Antichrist theology.

Summary for the Lurkers:

There is no “Israel” outside of Christ.

There is no covenant outside of His blood.

There is no “ongoing plan” for a Christ-rejecting nation.

Anyone preaching that God still has a separate redemptive plan for “the Jews” apart from Jesus is preaching another gospel.

And Scripture doesn’t mince words:
“If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.” — Galatians 1:9

So no, friend.

This isn’t about loving your enemies — it’s about recognizing when a false theology is calling the enemies of the Gospel "chosen by default" — and in doing so, blaspheming the cross, denying the New Covenant, and dragging the Body of Christ back under the Law.

And we won’t be gaslit by Zionist theology masquerading as compassion.

History proves this lie.
Scripture refutes it.
And Christ fulfilled it.

There is no Israel apart from Him.

Period.

That UN-birthed, Rothschild-funded impostor state in the Middle East — the one you dare to call “Israel” — is not a fulfillment of prophecy, but a blasphemous counterfeit. It stands as a monument to rebellion, a Zionist fist raised in defiance, and a geopolitical middle finger to the God of Abraham, who already crowned His King in Zion — and His name is Jesus Christ.