Anyone accusing you of “Replacement Theology” is defending the spirit of Antichrist.

[The Gospel of Christ]

Anyone accusing you of “Replacement Theology” is (knowingly or not), defending the spirit of Antichrist.

Why?

Because what they’re really saying is:

1. “Jesus did not fulfill the covenant with Israel.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy.)
They believe the Old Covenant is still active for ethnic Jews, which means Christ’s fulfillment was incomplete.

But Jesus said:
“It is finished.” — John 19:30
Not postponed. Not paused. Finished.

2. “The Messiah’s work wasn’t enough, and Jesus failed the first time.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy.)
This is a direct assault on the power and finality of the cross. It denies Hebrews 10:14:
“By one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.”

They imply that the cross didn’t fully accomplish redemption for Israel — as if God hit “pause” and still owes something to a group of unbelieving ethnic Jews, the vast majority of whom are not even Semitic. They are Gentile converts from Eastern Europe and Russia — Khazar descendants — who now make up over 95% of the population in modern Rothschild’s False Israel™. This fact has been documented by Jewish historian Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe and further confirmed by Israeli professor Smo Sand in The Invention of the Jewish People. Both men — recognized as Jews within Zionist society — exposed that the overwhelming majority of modern Israelis are NOT blood descendants of Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob, but are instead the product of an 8th century, medieval mass conversion from the Turkic Khazar empire.

Which means this:
The constant accusation of “antisemitism” against Christians who reject Antichrist Zionist theology is not only false — it is deliberate, weaponized gaslighting. You cannot be “antisemitic” for confronting a religious and political system built by non-Semitic impostors who reject the Messiah and pervert the Gospel.

3. “There’s still another plan for real ethnic Jews (if you can actually find one) and their converts… apart from faith in Christ.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy that completely contradicts the Gospel.)
This is a second path to salvation — a theology Paul explicitly condemns as another gospel (Galatians 1:6–9).

Acts 4:12: “There is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
There is no “Plan B” for Christ-rejecting Israel.

4. “There are two peoples of God — Israel and the Church — with two separate destinies.”
(This is Antichrist, blasphemous heresy that denies the Son.)
This splits what Christ made one. It contradicts Ephesians 2:14–16 and turns the Body of Christ into a temporary “parenthesis” instead of the prophetic fulfillment.

Ephesians 2:14:
“He has made the two one... breaking down the wall of separation.”
Christ demolished the wall.
Scofield’s theology builds it back up — brick by brick.
Dispensationalist doctrine doesn’t fulfill the Gospel — it reverses it.
What Jesus united, they divide.

5. “Jesus came to offer the Kingdom to Israel, but they rejected it — so now He’s coming back to finish what He couldn’t do the first time.”
This portrays Christ’s first coming as a failure, His death on the cross as meaningless, and the Church as a divine afterthought — a backup plan until the “real” plan with ethnic Israel can resume.
It is not prophecy.
It is total blasphemy — a doctrine of demons, dressed in eschatological drag.

Matthew 21:43: “The kingdom will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruit.”
Jesus didn’t fail. Israel did.

What they preach is Antichrist doctrine — by the Bible’s own definition.
Jesus didn’t teach it.
Paul didn’t teach it.
Peter didn’t.
John didn’t.
Jude didn’t.
Not one Apostle taught it.
No Church Father believed it — for 1,850 years of Christian history.
They would’ve called it the doctrine of demons, a synagogue of Satan theology, and a damnable heresy designed to divide the Body of Christ, resurrect a covenant God made obsolete, and crown a Christ-rejecting nation in place of the crucified King. They would’ve exposed it as a counter-Gospel, birthed from pride, weaponized through empire, and driven by the same Antichrist spirit that crucified the Lord of Glory.

1 John 2:22
“Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the Antichrist — the one who denies the Father and the Son.”

To deny that Jesus is the full and final fulfillment of God's covenant with Israel is to deny Christ Himself.

Let’s Be Clear:
Dispensationalist Evangelicalism doesn’t just add to the Gospel —
It subtracts Christ from Israel’s promises.

That’s not “another perspective.”
That’s another gospel.
Which Paul says is anathema (Galatians 1:6–9).

So yes — in plain terms:
If you reject that Jesus is Israel’s Messiah,
and claim there’s still a covenant apart from Him,
then you are following an Antichrist theology and doctrine —
and your eternal life is in jeopardy, because you are rejecting the Son and provoking the wrath of God.

Their dangerous theology teaches:
The Old Covenant is still open
Jesus Christ was a failure
The cross was not final
The Church is just a temporary detour
Ethnic identity (and apparently that of millions of Gentile converts) equals divine favor
Christ is not the only way — at least not for Jews

That’s not Christianity.
That’s not biblical.
That’s Antichrist theology, plain and simple.

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

Church Father Testimony:

Justin Martyr (c. 160 AD):
“The true spiritual Israel… are we who have been led to God through this crucified Christ.”
(Dialogue with Trypho, ch. 11)

Cyprian of Carthage (c. 250 AD)
A Church Father martyred for the faith, bishop of Carthage:
“Whoever believes in Christ is found to be of the seed of Abraham, and inherits the promise. The Jews, therefore, who were before, have ceased to be.” — Treatise 12, Book 1, par. 16

It doesn’t get more explicit than: “The Jews… have ceased to be.”
This confirms: The Church is Israel now. The Old has passed. The New has come.

And scripture agrees:

Romans 2:28–29
“For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly… but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit…”
Galatians 3:29
“If you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
Romans 9:6–8
“For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel… it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise.”
Hebrews 8:13
“In speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete. And what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.”
Ephesians 2:14–16
“For He Himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier… by setting aside in His flesh the law with its commands and regulations.”

This isn’t “Replacement Theology” —
It’s Fulfillment Theology, straight from the mouth of Christ and the featherpens of His apostles.

The Old Covenant is dead.
The New has come.
And the Church — the Body of Christ — is now the Israel of God. (Galatians 6:16)

Irenaeus (c. 180 AD):
“They who boast themselves as being the house of Jacob and the people of Israel are disinherited from the grace of God.”

Tertullian (c. 197 AD)
“We are they who have been foretold as about to believe in God and be justified by faith, and who are called the children of Abraham through the like faith… Therefore, as the heretics justly reproach us with being 'no longer Jews,' we say in reply: Yes — we are the true Jews, for we are the heirs of the faith.” — An Answer to the Jews, ch. 3

Yes, you didn't read that wrong — Tertullian is saying Christians are the “true Jews," the spiritual and covenantal Israel, under the New Covenant in Christ. He is not saying Christians become ethnic Jews, but that they become what a Jew was always meant to be: one in covenant with God, justified by faith, and a child of Abraham by promise. In the early Church, especially during the first century, Pharisees and other Law-bound Jews accused Jewish believers in Christ of abandoning Judaism — treating them as traitors for rejecting the Temple, the sacrificial system, and the oral traditions.

But those Jews who followed Christ — including the apostles — didn’t deny their heritage. They redefined it through the lens of fulfillment:

“We haven’t abandoned the covenant — we’re living in its fulfillment. You’re the ones stuck in a dead system that Christ fulfilled and replaced with something better.” (See Hebrews 8:13: “By calling this covenant ‘new,’ he has made the first one obsolete.”)

So yes — true New Covenant Jews are those who follow the King of the Jews — Jesus Christ.
If you can’t see that, it’s not because it’s complicated — it’s because you’re veiled, hardened in unbelief, just like Paul said in 2 Corinthians 3.

This is the same theology preached by:
Paul (Romans 9:6–8, Galatians 3:29)
Justin Martyr (Dialogue with Trypho)
Irenaeus
Cyprian
Augustine
And nearly every early Church Father before Dispensationalism existed.

The early Church knew what Scofield’s brainwashed followers (modern Evangelical Dispensationalists) deny:
The Church is Israel. The Old Covenant is dead. There is no salvation, no inheritance, and no promise outside of Christ. Period.

How Did We Get Here? The Scofield Scam:
It wasn’t prophecy. It was politics.

The Balfour Declaration was British imperialism, not a "divine promise".
The 1948 State of False Israel™ was birthed by secular atheists, funded by Rothschilds, enforced by the UN, and dripping in Freemasonic symbolism.
Meanwhile, Oxford University Press, under Rockefeller influence, mass-published MILLIONS of Scofield’s Zionist-infested "Free Study Bibles" and pumped them into American churches & seminaries like spiritual poison.
What they sold as fulfillment…
Was fabrication.

This wasn’t the return of Israel.
It was the rollout of a global deception —
with C.I. Scofield as the front man, and the Antichrist rabbis as the ghostwriters.

So when someone accuses you of “Replacement Theology”, what they're really saying is - “Jesus wasn’t the Son of God”.
Because that’s what it boils down to.

They’re saying the Messiah failed.
That He didn’t fulfill the covenant.
That God still owes something to a people who reject the Son.

The Rockefellers, Oxford Press, and Scofield did their job well:
They got millions of so-called Christians to think like the same Antichrist Pharisees who crucified Christ —
rejecting the cross, denying the covenant, and clinging to a corpse of a kingdom that's been dead for 2,000 years.

And what do they call this absolute madness?

“Sound doctrine.”

‍

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

So you really embrace that scofield bible guy's commentary???

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

So you really embrace that scofield bible guy's commentary???

No, not at all. But about 80% of the American Church does — and they’re so theologically lost they’re cheering for the same spirit that crucified Christ while marching straight into the gates of Hell.

If you think that's funny, I don't know what to tell you... Get help?

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

You're pretty unhinged today.

Are you like this all the time?

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

You're pretty unhinged today.

Are you like this all the time?

Stop trying to be cute, you're really not good at it.

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

OK, so unhinged all the time it is.

Thanks for the verification on that.

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

OK, so unhinged all the time it is.

Thanks for the verification on that.

Let me know when you can refute a single thing I typed up above.. Use scripture. Until then you've got nothing.
If you think that quoting Jesus Christ and the Apostles is "unhinged" then you've got way bigger problems than me.

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

I don't follow that scofield bible guy's commentary so you're on your own bro man!

 

[Lambano]

Christians ARE now God's people. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. (1 Peter 2:10) Don't let anybody tell you otherwise.

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. (Romans 11:28-29)

I hope everybody understands what is being said here, because Christians have historically committed some horrible acts against the Jews in the name of Jesus Christ. The Jewish people are still God's people and they are loved by God. This has nothing to do with their salvation. This has nothing to do with their faithfulness, but it has EVERYTHING to with God's faithfulness.

We have not "replaced" the Jews as God's people; we have been grafted on to them. If they are our enemies as far as the Gospel is concerned, just remember about how Jesus taught us to treat our enemies

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

Christians ARE now God's people. Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. (1 Peter 2:10) Don't let anybody tell you otherwise.

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. (Romans 11:28-29)

I hope everybody understands what is being said here, because Christians have historically committed some horrible acts against the Jews in the name of Jesus Christ. The Jewish people are still God's people and they are loved by God. This has nothing to do with their salvation. This has nothing to do with their faithfulness, but it has EVERYTHING to with God's faithfulness.

We have not "replaced" the Jews as God's people; we have been grafted on to them. If they are our enemies as far as the Gospel is concerned, just remember about how Jesus taught us to treat our enemies

You’re proof that a single misinterpretation — when repeated enough — can become an idol. And sadly, like most dispensationalists, you’re bowing to it.

Let’s walk through your confusion, step by step:

“We have not ‘replaced’ the Jews as God’s people; we have been grafted on to them.”

That’s not what Paul says.

Romans 11 is not about ethnic Jews being the root — Christ is.
The “olive tree” is not national Israel. The root is holy (Rom. 11:16) — it is Christ, the Abrahamic covenant fulfilled in Him (Galatians 3:16).
The natural branches? Unbelieving Jews were cut off. Gentiles were grafted in by faith.

Paul doesn’t say we’re grafted “onto Jews.”
He says we're grafted into the covenant promises fulfilled in Christ.

“The Jewish people are still God's people…”

That’s not what the New Testament teaches.

Romans 9:6–8 says not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel — and it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise.

That means ethnic lineage means absolutely nothing apart from faith in Christ.

You quote Romans 11:28–29, thinking it refers to ethnic Israel's continued chosenness — but Paul is simply explaining why God preserved a remnant (Romans 11:5). A remnant according to election by grace, not ethnic privilege. The irrevocable “gifts and calling” are fulfilled in Christ — not reactivated through a future geopolitical nation-state.

“This has nothing to do with their salvation… but everything to do with God's faithfulness.”

Then you just contradicted the Gospel.

God’s faithfulness IS the fulfillment of salvation in Christ.
Not a sentimental attachment to unbelieving, Christ-rejecting descendants of Khazar converts living in a Rothschild-built nation with an Antichrist flag.

“We’re grafted in, not replacing…”

Let’s get this straight:

The Church doesn’t “replace” Israel.
The Church is Israel — redefined by the cross, purified by faith, made one new man in Christ.
This isn’t “replacement.”
It’s fulfillment.

Ephesians 2:14–16:
“He has made the two one… breaking down the dividing wall…”

But Scofield theology builds that wall back up — and declares Christ's finished work unfinished.

“As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies… but loved on account of the patriarchs…”

Yes — and Paul explains why: so that mercy might come to the Gentiles.
But note — they are enemies of the Gospel.
And enemies of the Gospel are not “God’s chosen” — unless they repent and believe.

You cannot be “God’s people” while rejecting God’s Son.
That is Antichrist theology.

Summary for the Lurkers:

There is no “Israel” outside of Christ.

There is no covenant outside of His blood.

There is no “ongoing plan” for a Christ-rejecting nation.

Anyone preaching that God still has a separate redemptive plan for “the Jews” apart from Jesus is preaching another gospel.

And Scripture doesn’t mince words:
“If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.” — Galatians 1:9

So no, friend.

This isn’t about loving your enemies — it’s about recognizing when a false theology is calling the enemies of the Gospel "chosen by default" — and in doing so, blaspheming the cross, denying the New Covenant, and dragging the Body of Christ back under the Law.

And we won’t be gaslit by Zionist theology masquerading as compassion.

History proves this lie.
Scripture refutes it.
And Christ fulfilled it.

There is no Israel apart from Him.

Period.

That UN-birthed, Rothschild-funded impostor state in the Middle East — the one you dare to call “Israel” — is not a fulfillment of prophecy, but a blasphemous counterfeit. It stands as a monument to rebellion, a Zionist fist raised in defiance, and a geopolitical middle finger to the God of Abraham, who already crowned His King in Zion — and His name is Jesus Christ.

 

[Lambano]

Let’s walk through your confusion, step by step:

Okay; let's start with this: Chapters 9-11 are a single unit. Paul's theme is for this section, the question he is wrestling with, is the question he asks in chapter 11 verse 1: I ask then: Did God reject his people? If you don't understand that context, you'll miss the whole point. Paul brings up "election in verse 28. This is what Biblical election meant: 6 For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession. (Deuteronomy 7:6) If you don't understand the concept of "election" you won't understand what Paul's talking about.

You quote Romans 11:28–29, thinking it refers to ethnic Israel's continued chosenness — but Paul is simply explaining why God preserved a remnant (Romans 11:5

No, Romans 11:28-29 cannot refer to the believing Remnant. 28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs. (Romans 11:28) The believing Remnant is NOT the enemy of the Gospel. The enemy of the Gospel, the one who was chosen by God and still loved by God HAS to refer to unbelieving Jews.

Paul doesn’t say we’re grafted “onto Jews.”
He says we're grafted into the covenant promises fulfilled in Christ.

The "Olive Tree" in the metaphor is obviously, in context, God's people. The "broken branches" makes that clear. What he is saying is that we are grafted into God's people. It's about election. The covenant promises are a related, but different subject.

18 Do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. .... Do not be arrogant, but tremble. (Romans 11:18-20)

Good advice.

And a command Jesus's people have broken over and over down through history.

 

[Wick Stick]

I hope everybody understands what is being said here, because Christians have historically committed some horrible acts against the Jews in the name of Jesus Christ. The Jewish people are still God's people and they are loved by God. This has nothing to do with their salvation. This has nothing to do with their faithfulness, but it has EVERYTHING to with God's faithfulness.

We have not "replaced" the Jews as God's people; we have been grafted on to them. If they are our enemies as far as the Gospel is concerned, just remember about how Jesus taught us to treat our enemies

Israel is God's people. The Jews are 1 tribe out of 12 (or 13 or 14 depending how you count)

And, unhinged or no, there have always been fake Israelites. That's a thing, historically.

 

[Lambano]

And sadly, like most dispensationalists, ....

My objection to Dispensationalism is that it makes Christ's earthly life and his teachings completely irrelevant. The only thing that matters is His death. Even His resurrection is just a happy ending to the story.

So, I had no objection when my pastor decided to quietly have all the books in the "Left Behind" series in the church library thrown in the trash. True story.

 

[Lambano]

Israel is God's people.

The name "Israel" means "he rassles with God"; see Genesis 32:24-28. Which I suppose is better than "Jacob", meaning "he grasps the heel". And I still haven't figured out why all the guys names "Iakob" in the New Testament had their names changed to "James".

 

[Wick Stick]

The name "Israel" means "he rassles with God"; see Genesis 32:24-28. Which I suppose is better than "Jacob", meaning "he grasps the heel".

Uh... almost?

SR means prince or captain. EL means God. Prefixed Y's modify the word coming after them to make it a verb. Y SR EL = to be a prince of God

Gen 32:28 Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God

 

[Lambano]

Uh... almost?

SR means prince or captain. EL means God. Prefixed Y's modify the word coming after them to make it a verb. Y SR EL = to be a prince of God

Gen 32:28 Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God

Another translation is "he struggles with God", following from verse 28: Then the man said, “Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with men. See footnotes in the NIV and NET.

sn You have fought. The explanation of the name Israel includes a sound play. In Hebrew the verb translated “you have fought” (שָׂרִיתָ, sarita) sounds like the name “Israel” (יִשְׂרָאֵל, yisraʾel), meaning “God fights” (although some interpret the meaning as “he fights [with] God”).

So the conclusion is that God is a punster.

 

[Wick Stick]

So the conclusion is that God is a punster.

In language theory, it's called overloading - when a single word takes on multiple meanings. English has 30K+ words. Biblical Hebrew has 8K. Guess which one has 4x as much overloading?

 

[Big Boy Johnson]

You’re proof that a single misinterpretation — when repeated enough — can become an idol.

You’re proof that a single misinterpretation — when repeated enough — has become racism and hate

And, unhinged or no, there have always been fake Israelites. That's a thing, historically.

And, unhinged or no, there have always been fake Christians. That's a thing, historically.

The only thing that matters is His death. Even His resurrection is just a happy ending to the story.

Without the Lord's resurrection, His death would be meaningless and we would all still be in sin and lost.

 

[The Gospel of Christ]

Okay; let's start with this: Chapters 9-11 are a single unit.

You’re clinging to a theological illusion.

The New Testament never teaches that ethnic Jews retain covenant status apart from Christ. That’s not "God’s faithfulness" — it’s a denial of the Gospel. Romans 11 isn’t about exalting unbelieving Israel — it’s about God’s mercy in cutting off unbelief and grafting in those who believe, whether Jew or Gentile.

The “olive tree” is Christ. The “root” is not Abraham’s DNA — it’s the promise fulfilled in Him (Gal. 3:16). And those natural branches? They were broken off for unbelief (Rom. 11:20). Grafted-in Gentiles didn’t “replace” anyone — we were united into one body, one flock, one covenant. That’s fulfillment, not "replacement".

Paul explicitly says not all who are descended from Israel are Israel (Rom. 9:6). Ethnicity doesn’t equal election. The true children of God are the children of the promise — those in Christ. Period.

Your reading of Romans 11:28–29 assumes a future national redemption, but Paul is explaining why a remnant still exists — not predicting a future nationalistic revival. The “irrevocable gifts and calling” are found in the Messiah, not in the modern, UN/Rothschild abomination; False Israel™ founded in 1948.

If you think God’s faithfulness means honoring an unbelieving people just because of their bloodline, you’ve completely missed the Gospel. God’s covenant was never about DNA — it was always about the Seed, singular, who is Christ (Galatians 3:16).

And just FYI: 95% + of the people in modern (False) “Israel” aren’t the descendants of Abraham — they’re descendants of King Bulan’s Khazarian kingdom, who mass-converted to Talmudic Judaism in 740 A.D. That’s over seven centuries after Jesus already fulfilled the covenant.

If you think Bibi Netanyahu, Barbara Streisand, Mel Brooks, or Rob “Meathead” Reiner are ethnic biblical Jews, — I’ve got beachfront property in Nebraska and a Moses-signed menorah to sell you. Their ancestors weren’t wandering the desert with Moses — they were still praying to cave gods in the Caucasus while Paul was writing letters to the actual Church.

You want the truth? They’re about as “ethnically Jewish” as the population of Tokyo and just as descended from Abraham as my neighbor’s Chihuahua.

But sure, keep waving the demonic Star of Remphan and telling yourself it’s "prophecy". Just don’t be surprised when Jesus calls it what it is — rebellion wrapped in a Rothschild-funded flag.

There is no covenant outside of Him. There is no Israel outside of Him. And there is no redemption apart from the cross.

Your theology doesn’t glorify God’s mercy — it glorifies unbelief, and tries to resurrect a wall Christ already tore down (Eph. 2:14–16).
That’s not faith. That’s Scofield.

There is one elect people — the Body of Christ.
There is one Shepherd — and His sheep hear His voice.
There is one covenant — sealed in His blood.

If anyone tells you otherwise, they are not defending scripture — they are defending a system built on sentiment, Zionist politics, and a denial of everything the New Testament declares fulfilled.

Christ is the fulfillment.

Not a nation.
Not a bloodline.
Not a flag.

Jesus Christ is King — and His Kingdom is not of this world.

Maybe the Smithsonian Institute can help you all out a little.

A bonafide, REAL "ethnic Biblical Jew" from the tribe of Judah seen on the left.. and an 8th century Gentile, Khazar convert seen on the right. Notice anything unusual? That's right... Nearly no one living in the modern Rothschild-abomination you call "Israel" looks like the man on the left do they. In fact in 2018, Netanyahu began purging all people that looked like the man on the left from False Israel™ during his "Infiltrator Deportation Plan."

​

Think about that.​

A government built by Gentile, European Khazars (who converted to post-Christ Talmudism in the 8th century) expelling dark-skinned African Hebrews whose ancestors may have kept fragments of the Abrahamic faith for thousands of years — and calling them the outsiders?

That’s not just hypocrisy.
That’s prophetic inversion.

Jesus said, “The first shall be last, and the last shall be first.” (Matthew 20:16)

Modern Israel flipped that upside down.
They crowned the last as first — and are doing everything in their power to erase the remnant of those who might actually bear the bloodline of David.

When it comes to the "false Jews" of Revelation, you can't get any more false than these Khazar's.

Top 10 Reasons the Khazars Are the False Jews of Revelation

1. They’re GENTILES — not Semites.
Let’s get this straight: these are European Caucasus Turks who converted in the 8th century A.D. They’re not the bloodline of Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob — they’re Gentile proselytes from a pagan empire. The real irony? They call everyone else “goyim” when they are the goyim.

2. They came to Judaism through King Bulan — not through the covenant of Moses or the Gospel of Christ.
Their “conversion” was a political move to avoid pressure from the rising Christian and Muslim empires. It wasn’t about truth, repentance, or revelation. It was about survival and leverage — not faith.

3. They didn’t just reject Christ — they never knew Him.
They weren’t even around when Jesus fulfilled the covenant. These weren’t the people of the Exodus. These weren’t the scribes or Pharisees. They were still worshipping pagan gods in the Caucasus when Christ was crucified.

4. They adhere to Talmudic Judaism — which blasphemes Christ.
They didn’t convert to Torah in 740AD — they converted to the Babylonian Talmud, a collection of anti-Christ oral traditions that slander Jesus, deify rabbis, and override Scripture. Revelation calls them a synagogue of Satan for a reason.

5. They hijacked prophecy to legitimize a fake Israel.
By claiming divine right to the land and title of “God’s chosen people,” they’ve rewritten Scripture to crown themselves heirs of promises that only apply to those in Christ (Galatians 3:16, 3:28–29). So as blasphemous as blasphemous gets.

6. They expelled or oppressed actual Semitic Jews and black Hebrews.
From the Yemenite children scandal to the 2018 “Infiltrator Removal” purge of African migrants (some of whom may be true Judahites), they’ve actively suppressed non-European Jews to preserve power and appearance.

7. They invented the “Star of David” — but the Bible only mentions the Star of Remphan.
There is no “Star of David” in Scripture. Not once. It’s a modern, occult fabrication, falsely marketed as an ancient symbol of Israel. The only six-pointed star the Bible actually names is the Star of Remphan — a demonic emblem of idolatry, rebellion, and blood-soaked pagan worship (Amos 5:26, Acts 7:43).

And let’s be clear:
The real ethnic Israelites who used that star weren’t honoring God —
they were sacrificing their children, holding ritual orgies, and dancing around it while provoking the wrath of Heaven.
That star wasn’t holy.
It wasn’t Davidic.
It was Babylonian filth, and it brought judgment then — just as it will again.

And today, it flies over a nation claiming to be “God’s chosen”?
That’s not prophecy. That’s blasphemy with a flag.




So what’s flying over the Rothschild-built “Holy Land”?
Not a mark of covenant — but a demonic sigil of defiance.

If the Apostles or early Church Fathers walked through a time machine and saw that star hoisted over Jerusalem, stamped on pulpits, and glowing behind the President of the United States, they’d fall to their knees in horror, weep uncontrollably, and probably collapse in grief.

Because they knew exactly what that demonic star meant.
And it wasn’t of David.
It was of Remphan.
And it never belonged to God.

8. They operate globally through Zionist influence — not through spiritual covenant.
This isn’t a humble remnant awaiting the Messiah. This is a network of Christ-rejecting elites, bankers, and political power brokers who wield Zionism as a weapon to manipulate both secular and religious systems.

9. They deny the Gospel — and are enemies of it.
Romans 11:28 calls them “enemies of the Gospel” — not “chosen by default.” Their rebellion is not neutral. It is hostile to the cross of Christ and the kingdom of God.

10. They claim to be ethnic Biblical Jews — but are not.
This is the exact wording of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Christ didn’t say they were mistaken — He said they lie. That’s deliberate. They’ve hijacked the name “Jew” and stolen the title “Israel” while rejecting the very God who defines both. Are they really ethnic Biblical Jews? LOL Not in a million years.. Their ancestors couldn't find ancient Israel with a map if they were already standing in the middle of it. They're as Gentile as Mr. Rogers, Stalin and Tom Hanks.

Bottom Line:

You can’t get any more “false Jew” than:

Gentile by blood
Talmudist by religion
Zionist by politics
Antichrist by spirit

They are not the continuation of biblical Israel.
They are the fulfillment of Christ’s warning.
They are the synagogue of Satan — and they’ve deceived almost the entire world.

Awake yet?
You’d better be.
Because your eternal soul depends on it.