Couldn't find any evidence, huh? I'm not ignoring your questions, you're ignoring my answers because they don't fit into your worldview. As for the "domain" thing, I don't have to subscribe to the arbitrary organization & grouping of species that is based on bad (non-observable) science. Even Darwin recognized that the fossil record was a huge problem for his theory because it didn't show gradualism. In Darwin's words, "Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." Darwin hoped that future fossil discoveries would vindicate his theory, but time has proven him wrong. If Darwinism were true, we would have found hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of transitional fossils by now. But according to the late Harvard paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould (an evolutionist), "The history of most fossil species includes two features particularly inconsistent with gradualism: 1) Stasis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; Morphological change is usually limited and directionless. 2) Sudden Appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed'." And furthermore, I do not have to answer your questions, you are the one promoting this theory; you have to prove it.
As for the donkey & the seedless grapes, so you're saying evolution occured by two species crossbreeding and creating a sterile offspring...something is wrong with that logic.
Have a blessed day!
Fred Lamm