- Jan 26, 2017
- 10,591
- 8,435
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
I’ve been thinking about His coming “as a thief” and the help of “don’t be caught unaware” “but watch”. So that day doesn’t overcome you as a thief.
This is only my thoughts on the topic. To me it’s a matter of perspective. Where one is overcome and curses that they have been stolen from. Consider the verses they speak Evil of Him, but on your part He is Glorified. To me it’s who we say He is … “as a thief” or “no thief” but the deliverer out from as Paul said “those things I counted as dung” “to be found as Christ”. but that isn’t the only perspective “counting those things loss as dung” for something more true and better promises…to some the cross is offensive.
If we the body tell others He comes as a thief …are we calling Him a thief? Rather than 1 Peter 4:1-4 Forasmuch then as Christ has suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin; [2] That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. [3] For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: [4] Wherein they think it strange (Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you: 1 Peter 4:12) that you run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you:
“Speaking evil against you” I have to consider why do they speak evil, as if you are some thief come to steal away “walking in lasciviousness, lusts, excess wine, revellings, banqueting, and abominable idolatries” …where “they call it something strange” that you run not with them in excess of riot…could it be they speak evil as if you all are “as a thief” …does that make you a thief? Or their perspective is: “you thief” “you stealer” of our livelihoods! Another example is when the woman who made the men she served rich…but Paul and the others set her free from the evil spirit…they accused Paul and the others of “thievery” in absolving or “taking away” what they profited off of.
Does the crucifixion take away what men profit off of? Whats the perspective of the crucifixion? Is it “as a thief” or “No thief” but speaking of better things than those things that are removed in Christ?
Yes, to me “as a thief” isn’t saying He is a thief but what man perceive He is, their own speaking evil of Him. To me this helps with “He thought it not as robbery to be equal with God” …no matter how many ways we can interpret “equal with God” …only sharing what it has come to mean to me. Where He thought of it not as robbery…He thought of it is not as a thief(even asking them when they come to get him in the garden—do you come out against me with swords as a thief?) … He thought of the crucifixion not as robbery to be “equal to the Father”: in “the Father gave unto us His only begotten Son” And “the only begotten Son gave unto us His Father”…how more “alike” or “equal” can they get: As the Father gave unto us His only begotten Son —equally—the only begotten Son also gave unto us His Father.
… in “I have the power to lay down My life and the power to take it up again”
John 16:27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God.
To me…He thought it not robbery to be equal with God …isn’t about a power struggle for “equal to” Romans 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.
Not as unarmed and unprepared of “as a thief” comes upon you, “but consider it not robbery to be equal unto God” where Jesus Christ endured the shame of the crucifixion(not seeing it as robbery to be equal unto God) for the joy set before Him…
It’s men who are “as thieves” …not God.
This is only my thoughts on the topic. To me it’s a matter of perspective. Where one is overcome and curses that they have been stolen from. Consider the verses they speak Evil of Him, but on your part He is Glorified. To me it’s who we say He is … “as a thief” or “no thief” but the deliverer out from as Paul said “those things I counted as dung” “to be found as Christ”. but that isn’t the only perspective “counting those things loss as dung” for something more true and better promises…to some the cross is offensive.
If we the body tell others He comes as a thief …are we calling Him a thief? Rather than 1 Peter 4:1-4 Forasmuch then as Christ has suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that has suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin; [2] That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God. [3] For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries: [4] Wherein they think it strange (Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you: 1 Peter 4:12) that you run not with them to the same excess of riot, speaking evil of you:
“Speaking evil against you” I have to consider why do they speak evil, as if you are some thief come to steal away “walking in lasciviousness, lusts, excess wine, revellings, banqueting, and abominable idolatries” …where “they call it something strange” that you run not with them in excess of riot…could it be they speak evil as if you all are “as a thief” …does that make you a thief? Or their perspective is: “you thief” “you stealer” of our livelihoods! Another example is when the woman who made the men she served rich…but Paul and the others set her free from the evil spirit…they accused Paul and the others of “thievery” in absolving or “taking away” what they profited off of.
Does the crucifixion take away what men profit off of? Whats the perspective of the crucifixion? Is it “as a thief” or “No thief” but speaking of better things than those things that are removed in Christ?
Yes, to me “as a thief” isn’t saying He is a thief but what man perceive He is, their own speaking evil of Him. To me this helps with “He thought it not as robbery to be equal with God” …no matter how many ways we can interpret “equal with God” …only sharing what it has come to mean to me. Where He thought of it not as robbery…He thought of it is not as a thief(even asking them when they come to get him in the garden—do you come out against me with swords as a thief?) … He thought of the crucifixion not as robbery to be “equal to the Father”: in “the Father gave unto us His only begotten Son” And “the only begotten Son gave unto us His Father”…how more “alike” or “equal” can they get: As the Father gave unto us His only begotten Son —equally—the only begotten Son also gave unto us His Father.
… in “I have the power to lay down My life and the power to take it up again”
John 16:27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God.
To me…He thought it not robbery to be equal with God …isn’t about a power struggle for “equal to” Romans 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.
Not as unarmed and unprepared of “as a thief” comes upon you, “but consider it not robbery to be equal unto God” where Jesus Christ endured the shame of the crucifixion(not seeing it as robbery to be equal unto God) for the joy set before Him…
It’s men who are “as thieves” …not God.
Last edited: