AstraZeneca's very dangerous vaccine

[Enoch111]

[Please note: The following information is strictly my personal research, and has not been plagiarized from another source. I have shown the references for quotations where needed, some of which are extensive]

PART I
AstraZeneca's vaccine was approved by the World Health Organization in February, 2021 and is being currently distributed worldwide. But two long term care patients died in South Korea within days of being vaccinated. As usual, the public health officials tried to suggest that there was no "direct link". And that is the real issue. The truth is never presented honestly. Over and over again, there is a denial of a direct link (unless it suits the public health officials). "Several French hospitals are pausing or slowing down AstraZeneca vaccination programmes for their staff because severe - albeit temporary - side effects have caused many employees to need sick leave, causing severe logistical problems in already over-stretched services." So it could mean that the cure is worse than the disease.

While the mRNA vaccines are troubling, AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine should be very troubling, particularly to third world countries. There are several reasons for this: (1) it is not a genuine vaccine in the traditional and accepted sense; (2) it was improperly tested; (3) it was rushed to market without proper evaluation of all the actual and potential issues; (4) those who have funded it have a conflict of interest in the profits they will reap from it; and (5) the people behind this vaccine are also the people seriously behind Eugenics.

1. AstraZeneca's vaccine is not a genuine traditional vaccine
According to the World Health Organization "The ChAdOx1-S/nCoV-19 [recombinant] vaccine is a replication-deficient adenoviral vector vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The vaccine expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gene, which instructs the host cells to produce the protein of the S-antigen unique to SARS-CoV-2, allowing the body to generate an immune response and to retain that information in memory immune cells." In other words it uses another mammalian virus to trick the body into thinking that coronavirus has entered in.

This is further explained here:"A coronavirus vaccine known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 was developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (the cause of COVID-19). In this vaccine, a modified version of a chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) is used which can enter human cells but not replicate inside. A gene for the coronavirus vaccine was added into the adenovirus DNA, allowing the vaccine to target the spike proteins that SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter human cells." What are Adenovirus-Based Vaccines?

2. AstraZeneca's vaccine was improperly tested
a) It was tested in only the UK, Brazil, and South Africa, but the results for S. Africa were obfuscated.
b) There was only one medical doctor on the research team. The rest were all PhD's. For a medical study, this appears to be rather irresponsible.
c) It was only an "interim" analysis of results. Yet the vaccine is being distributed.
d) It was limited to ages 18-55 in the primary trials. Those who need it most are in the 65 to 85+ age group, but they were excluded, probably because that would have been the death of the vaccine!
e) While South Africa is mentioned, the total number of participants (11,636 out of a total of 23,848) only included those from the UK and Brazil.
f) While the control (or placebo) is always supposed to be a saline solution, "meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine" -- another vaccine -- was used unfairly to skew the results: As a result "From 21 days after the first dose, there were ten cases hospitalised for COVID-19, all in the control arm; two were classified as severe COVID-19, including one death." Using the term "control arm" is rather unusual (if not silly), but the researchers had no business complicating things by administering a vaccine for meningitis as a control.
g) A standard dosage was not used consistently, and for all participants. That in itself should have nullified the trials.
h) Efficacy was tested against symptoms, but also using the discredited PCR test (assuming that the same faulty procedure was used which has skewed results everywhere).
i) None of the participants was actually exposed to real existing cases of coronavirus patients under treatment, which means that no one knows how good the immunization really is (or is not).
j) The manufacturers of the vaccine were actually separate entities from AstraZeneca, so technically it was not even an AstraZeneca vaccine."The recombinant adenovirus for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was manufactured and vialed by Advent (Pomezia, Italy), and additional batches produced by COBRA Biologics (Keele, UK) and vialed by Symbiosis (Sterling, UK)."

 

[Enoch111]

PART II

3. AstraZeneca's vaccine was rushed to market without the proper evaluation of all issues
a) In pre-trials with monkeys, the vaccine was found to be useless: 'A trial of the vaccine in rhesus macaque monkeys did not stop the animals from catching the virus and has raised questions about the vaccine's likely human efficacy and ongoing development. The vaccine, known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, is undergoing human trials in Britain. The Government has brokered a deal between Oxford University and the drug company AstraZeneca to produce up to 30 million doses if it proves successful, having ploughed £47 million into the research. "All of the vaccinated monkeys treated with the Oxford vaccine became infected when challenged as judged by recovery of virus genomic RNA from nasal secretions," said Dr William Haseltine, a former Harvard Medical School professor who had a pivotal role in the development of early HIV/Aids treatments. "There was no difference in the amount of viral RNA detected from this site in the vaccinated monkeys as compared to the unvaccinated animals. Which is to say, all vaccinated animals were infected," Dr Haseltine wrote in an article on Forbes.' Doubts over Oxford vaccine as it fails to stop coronavirus in animal trials

b) Qualifying symptoms were not uniform for all those tested: "In the UK and Brazil, the list of qualifying symptoms for swabbing included any one of the following: fever of at least 37·8°C, cough, shortness of breath, and anosmia or ageusia. In South Africa, the list of qualifying symptoms for swabbing was broader, and additionally included myalgia, chills, sore throat, headache, nasal congestion, diarrhoea, runny nose, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite."

c) All serious adverse results were obfuscated, minimized or dismissed as unrelated, which is totally irresponsible, and dishonest to boot:
(i) Serious adverse events occurred in 168 participants, 79 of whom received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 89 of whom received MenACWY or saline control (appendix 1 pp 15–18). There were 175 events (84 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 91 in the control group), three of which were considered possibly related to either the experimental or a control vaccine.
(ii) A case of haemolytic anaemia in the control group in the UK phase 1/2 study occurring 10 days after MenACWY vaccine was considered possibly related to the intervention and has been previously described.5
(iii) A case of transverse myelitis was reported 14 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster vaccination as being possibly related to vaccination, with the independent neurological committee considering the most likely diagnosis to be of an idiopathic, short segment, spinal cord demyelination.
(iv) A potentially vaccine-related serious adverse event was reported 2 days after vaccination in South Africa in an individual who recorded fever higher than 40°C, but who recovered rapidly without an alternative diagnosis and was not admitted to hospital. The participant remains masked to group allocation, continues in the trial, and received a second dose of the allocated vaccine without a similar reaction.
(v) There were two additional cases of transverse myelitis that were originally reported as potentially related but later determined to be unlikely to be related to vaccination by an independent committee of neurological experts. One case that occurred 10 days after a first vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was initially assessed as possibly related, but later considered unlikely to be related by the site investigator when further investigation revealed pre-existing, but previously unrecognised, multiple sclerosis. The second case was reported 68 days after MenACWY vaccination. While considered possibly related by the site investigator at the time of reporting, an independent panel of neurological experts considered this to be unlikely. All trial participants have recovered, or are in a stable or improving condition.
(vi) There were four non-COVID-19 deaths reported across the studies (three in the control arm and one in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 arm) that were all considered unrelated to the vaccine, with cause of death assessed as road traffic accident, blunt force trauma, homicide, and fungal pneumonia.

It should be noted that "The issues raised by their decision to partner with manufacturers with dark histories of product safety issues are compounded by the adverse reactions reported in the Oxford-AstraZeneca trials as well as the ways in which those trials have been conducted. In September, AstraZeneca was forced to pause its experimental COVID-19 vaccine trial after a woman in the UK developed a “suspected serious reaction” that the New York Times reported was consistent with transverse myelitis. TM is a neurological disorder characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord, a major element of the central nervous system. It often results in weakness of the limbs, problems emptying the bladder, and paralysis. Patients can become severely disabled, and there is currently no effective cure." Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement

c) No one knows the long-term effects of this vaccine. Yet it is being rushed out all over the world.

5. There was only a mild critique of the AstraZeneca study
On December 8, 2020 Nature published "Oxford COVID-vaccine paper highlights lingering unknowns about results" which focused on the issues which were not addressed by the study, but did not go far enough.
a) They called the reduced dosage to some participants as a "measurement error" (which is inexcusable). However, those results were still included in the study.
b) They wondered how a higher efficacy was possible with a lower dosage.
c) They also pointed out that the study excluded those over 55 years of age.
d) They also talked about asymptomatic people infecting others, when that really is a non-issue.
e) They neglected to talk about the adverse reactions and deaths.

 

[Enoch111]

PART III

6. The hidden agenda of AstraZeneca needs to be understood
"Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement" is an article which has been written by Jeremy Loffredo and Whitney Webb, and published here: Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement

It is quite detailed and exposes all the high-level connections in the UK between (1) Oxford University, (2) the UK and US governments, (3) various institutes involved with both virology and eugenics, (4) various multi-million and multi-billion dollar trusts and foundations which are working towards de-populating the planet, and (5) pharmaceutical companies (which will make huge profits), which the mainstream media have simply ignored or refused to expose. There are billions of dollars to be made from this vaccine, and all these people have two primary goals in mind: (1) de-populate the third world and (2) promote annual vaccinations for COVID-19 forever. But there is a web of deceit which has been hidden from view.

"Historically, eugenics encouraged people of so-called healthy, superior stock to reproduce and discouraged reproduction of the mentally challenged or anyone who fell outside the social norm. Eugenics was popular in America during much of the first half of the twentieth century, yet it earned its negative association mainly from Adolf Hitler’s obsessive attempts to create a superior Aryan race." Eugenics.

What is noted in this article is "As this series has shown, there are many concerns regarding the points where race and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the US and abroad intersect, both publicly and privately. Part 1 of this series raised questions about the policy-shaping role of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which suggested that the US government make COVID-19 vaccines available to ethnic minorities and the mentally challenged first. Part 2 explained how in order to allocate COVID-19 vaccines in the US, health agencies are using a program created by Palantir, a company with a record of helping the US agencies target ethnic minorities through immigration policy and racist policing."

The following entities have all been named and connected:
A. Big Tech
The venture-capital arm of Google, Google Ventures
B. Foundations
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
The Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative (GAVI), a public-private partnership founded and currently funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, plans to distribute the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to low-income, predominantly African and Asian countries once it’s approved.
The Race Betterment Foundation
C. Governments
Operation Warp Speed funded by the US government
The UK’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies
The Medical Research Council (UK government)
Department of Health (UK government)
The UK’s Vaccines Network
The EU’s Vaccines Network equivalent, MultiMalVax
US Health and Human Service’s BARDA
USAID
D. Individuals
Adrian Hill, with multiple connections
Sarah Gilbert, with multiple connections
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet
Andrew Baum, global head of health care for Citi Group
Andrew Crawford-Brunt (Deutsche Bank’s long-time global head of equity trading at its London branch)
Google’s cofounder Larry Page and his wife Lucy
John Bell—an Oxford medical professor and an “architect” of the Oxford-AstraZeneca partnership
Pascal Soriot, the CEO of AstraZeneca
Vaccitech’s CEO, Bill Enright
Anthony Fauci
Charles Chiu, a professor of infectious diseases at the University of California–San Francisco
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
Turi King
Elena Bochukova
Jess Buxton
David Coleman with MigrationWatch
John Harvey Kellogg, founder of the Race Betterment Foundation
Charles Davenport, a scientist known for his collaborative research efforts with eugenicists in Nazi Germany
David Weatherall, for whom the Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine is named
Walter Bodmer, a former president of the Galton Institute
David J. Galton,Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute and one of its officers, whose work includes Eugenics: The Future of Human Life in the 21st Century.
Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations
Frederick Osborn, as the cofounder of the American Eugenics Society (later renamed Society for the Study of Social Biology) put it in 1968, “Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under a name other than eugenics.”
E. Institutions
The Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research
The Oxford Vaccine Group
The Galton Institute (which is the renamed UK Eugenics Society, or the British Eugenics Society) and has called for reducing population growth selectively
The University of Oxford
The Institute for Animal Health (now called the Pirbright Institute)
The Serum Institute of India
F. Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies
GlaxoSmithKline
Vaccitech
Emergent Biosolutions
Italian biotech Okairos
A small French biotech called Imaxio
Oxford Science Innovations
Braavos Capital
Sequoia Capital’s Chinese branch
The Chinese pharmaceutical company Fosun Pharma
Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products
BioPort
BioThrax
G. Trusts
The Wellcome Trust
Wellcome Trust Strategic Awards
Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genomics
Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics
The Myers Group

 

[Taken]

AstraZeneca's very dangerous vaccine
OP ^

All the vaccines were rushed. And ARE part of a "rushed" voluntary human trials experiment.

Each Pharma Company is collecting data on their voluntary trial experiments of vaccinated human subjects.
Data collected so far has revealed a number of deaths attributed to vaccinated humans, and the identified Pharmacy Companies that produced the Vaccine.

Offered to all...but make no uneducated mistake;
The vaccines offered for specifically what they are calling "Covid-19", is a voluntary human trial experiment. There is no data on long term side effects- well except for the death reports from the Vaccines...that's a long term permanent effect!

 

[mailmandan]

Utah mother dies four days after taking second COVID vaccine dose

Utah mother dies four days after taking second COVID vaccine dose