Marymog
Well-Known Member
- Mar 7, 2017
- 11,462
- 1,704
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Hold on....wait a minute. This is confusing. So now that you have added more twists to your theory. So now I have to ask you: WHO has the ability and the "due diligence" to do a "detailed analytical study complete with vetting and other tests for the data"?? You? Me? Martin Luther? The Baptist Church? Catholic Church? Lutheran Church....etc etc etc?No, it was correct the first time.
Many people use the circular reasoning of this for various reasons but ..
There is a significant difference between "reading" and doing a detailed analytical study complete with vetting and other tests for the data.
Then we have the other influences such as personal belief, organizational agenda, accuracy/availability of the source data, limits of the 'read', prevalent social order of the times and so forth.
What we have ( barring nothing truly "original" I grant) is what we have.
That's even excluding anything alleged to be "supernatural (revelations of the Spirit)
At the end of the day, Scripture is what we have and base everything on- therefore it is the authority. The rest (due diligence) is on us.
So, no, all opinions and conclusions are not "equal" in that regard
Previously I asked you: Who decides what a false doctrine is? Your answer was "Scripture"!!! Your answer is a text book example of "circular reasoning". Can you not see that? Scripture doesn't decide what a false doctrine is. Men, with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, decide that. Your theory that all we have to do is read Scripture to determine what false doctrine is IS circular reasoning. We are just going in ONE BIG CIRCLE when I disagree with you about your doctrine and I point to Scripture to prove my point. You then point to Scripture to prove your point!!! I then point to another passage to prove you wrong. You point to a passage to prove me wrong. One big circle..... Surly you can see that?