.
FAQ: How was Christ biologically related to Adam without having a biological
father? (Luke 1:26-34)
A: The woman wasn't a discreet creation, i.e. Eve wasn't a solo specimen
constructed directly from dust like Adam was; instead, Eve was made from
already-created human material taken from Adam's body. (Gen 2:21-22)
In other words: chemically, organically, and biologically; Eve was just as
much the Man as Adam; except of course for gender. (Gen 2:23)
So then, any posterity that Eve's body might engender would be Adam's
posterity just as much as they would be hers because every part of the
posterity's bodies-- including their brains --would be constructed with
material taken from their mother's body; which was, in turn, constructed
with material taken from Adam's body.
Addressing the Serpent, God said:
"I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and
her seed; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Gen
3:15)
Pretty much everybody on both sides of the aisle agrees that passage
predicted Christ.
"her seed" indicates that Christ would be Eve's biological posterity; and if so,
then he would also be Adam's biological posterity because all of Eve's bodily
parts and functions were constructed of material taken from Adam's body.
There's more.
Mary's pregnancy is stated to be caused not by an implant, rather, caused
by conception.
• Luke 1:31 . .You will conceive in your womb, and bear a son, and you shall
name him Jesus.
In order for Mary's pregnancy to be the result of conception, her body's seed
would have to be involved. Well, unless someone can prove beyond the
slightest hint of sensible doubt that Mary's body was in no way the biological
posterity of Eve's body, then we have to conclude that Eve's seed was the
origin of Mary's seed; and if so, then the origin of Mary's seed was Adam's
body.
_
FAQ: How was Christ biologically related to Adam without having a biological
father? (Luke 1:26-34)
A: The woman wasn't a discreet creation, i.e. Eve wasn't a solo specimen
constructed directly from dust like Adam was; instead, Eve was made from
already-created human material taken from Adam's body. (Gen 2:21-22)
In other words: chemically, organically, and biologically; Eve was just as
much the Man as Adam; except of course for gender. (Gen 2:23)
So then, any posterity that Eve's body might engender would be Adam's
posterity just as much as they would be hers because every part of the
posterity's bodies-- including their brains --would be constructed with
material taken from their mother's body; which was, in turn, constructed
with material taken from Adam's body.
Addressing the Serpent, God said:
"I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and
her seed; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Gen
3:15)
Pretty much everybody on both sides of the aisle agrees that passage
predicted Christ.
"her seed" indicates that Christ would be Eve's biological posterity; and if so,
then he would also be Adam's biological posterity because all of Eve's bodily
parts and functions were constructed of material taken from Adam's body.
There's more.
Mary's pregnancy is stated to be caused not by an implant, rather, caused
by conception.
• Luke 1:31 . .You will conceive in your womb, and bear a son, and you shall
name him Jesus.
In order for Mary's pregnancy to be the result of conception, her body's seed
would have to be involved. Well, unless someone can prove beyond the
slightest hint of sensible doubt that Mary's body was in no way the biological
posterity of Eve's body, then we have to conclude that Eve's seed was the
origin of Mary's seed; and if so, then the origin of Mary's seed was Adam's
body.
_