aspen2,
I think you need to take a reality check. You seem to be a loggerheads with several posters. Your posts do not directly address points to put to you but respond to them with a tangent, and you end up arguing about your tangents.
It is not quibbling, you have posted stuff that is a contradiction and it is being challenged; if you dont like it I suggest you find another forum
You do not have to respond to me. The fact is, I clarified your misunderstanding about my post - you just don't like it.
The fact is, many of the members of the Early Church did not like being persecuted, tortured or killed - we know this from Eusebius. I have claimed that a conversion of government officials or a replacement of government officials with Christians was not on their minds. The reason it was not on their minds is that there were no Christian nations on Earth at the time, nor had there ever been a Christian nation on Earth. Also, the Christians were expecting Christ to return any minute.
They may have wished that Rome would fall. They may have hoped that Christ set up a new government when He returned. They may have wished that Roman officials would legalize Christianity. They may have wished that the Roman officials would simply stop persecuting and torturing and killing Christians. They may of been hoping that Christianity would be recognized as an exception to the rule of Cesar worship - like Judaism.
As you can see, there are a multitude of ideas that Christians may have been thinking. Rome did not have to be converted to Christianity for the persecution to end. Therefore, both ideas; hoping that persecution would end AND not expecting or even imagining Rome's conversion COULD be true at the same time.
Because they did not live in a Democracy, they did not believe they could elect Christian leadership. Since they lived under the rule of a ruthless dictator, which they referred to as 'The Beast', they did not imagine the Roman government converting to Christianity.
Now, was this really necessary for you to understand the mistake you made by interpreting my post as a contradiction? Certainly not. Your welcome. I accept your apology.