Why do people limit God to two covenants in dealing with me?
The Bible sure does not.
So let's talk about covenants dealing with all of mankind in the context of dispensations or whatever you wish to call periods of history.
Let me add under grace at the Last Supper Christ gave the new covenant of his blood.
And when the church is raptured will be the new covenant to the houses of Judah and Israel which will have new law similar to Mosaic law but much better because it will be administrated under the physical Jesus Christ.
There are other covenants such as the Noahidic which promises to never destroy the earth again with water.
And some others that were given to specific people.
This is not about promoting dispensationalism. It is for discussing covenants.
My point here is we do not live under the new covenant talked about in Hebrews. That was addressed to Jews concerning the new covenant to the house of Judah and Israel. Not the blood covenant of Christ.
That is so falsely pushed to promote legalism, replacement theology and more.
The Bible sure does not.
So let's talk about covenants dealing with all of mankind in the context of dispensations or whatever you wish to call periods of history.

Let me add under grace at the Last Supper Christ gave the new covenant of his blood.
And when the church is raptured will be the new covenant to the houses of Judah and Israel which will have new law similar to Mosaic law but much better because it will be administrated under the physical Jesus Christ.
There are other covenants such as the Noahidic which promises to never destroy the earth again with water.
And some others that were given to specific people.
This is not about promoting dispensationalism. It is for discussing covenants.
My point here is we do not live under the new covenant talked about in Hebrews. That was addressed to Jews concerning the new covenant to the house of Judah and Israel. Not the blood covenant of Christ.
That is so falsely pushed to promote legalism, replacement theology and more.
Last edited: