He was stabbed 23 times by the men who were supposed to protect him. That is dying in anger, as the anger was directed to him.
Barnes:
Neither in anger - Hebrew, “angers.” Not in any tumult or excitement, or by any rage of his subjects. This would certainly imply that his death would be a peaceful death.
Thanks @ewq1938 . An issue I have is the word 'destroyed':
Daniel 11:20 - "Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes in the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle."
Being destroyed does not sound like a 'peaceful death'.
What about the death of Pompey, who happened to be a raiser of taxes in the First Triumvirate. Do you know anything about that?
AI Overview:
- Pompey's Assassination: Hoping to gain Caesar's favor, King Ptolemy XIII of Egypt had Pompey assassinated and presented Caesar with his severed head upon his arrival in Alexandria in 48 BCE.
This was a big enough deal that it is in the history books and of course, in Cleopatra movies:
This would make Daniel 11:21 about Julius Caesar:
AI Overview:
If we were to reinterpret this verse as alluding to Julius Caesar, here's a possible approach:
Daniel 11:21: a reinterpretive lens
- "In his place a contemptible person will arise, to whom the honor of kingship has not been conferred": This could refer to Julius Caesar's ambitious rise to power, circumventing traditional political structures and eventually seizing control as dictator, rather than being granted rule through established means.
- "He will invade the kingdom when its people feel secure, and he will seize it through intrigue": Caesar's political maneuvering and military campaigns, including his crossing of the Rubicon, which initiated a civil war and ultimately led to his dominance, could be viewed through this verse. The idea of seizing power through "intrigue" fits the political climate of the late Roman Republic where alliances and betrayals were common.