- Nov 14, 2012
- 11
- 0
- 0
And not a true Disciple of Christ?
That he was the 13th Disciple who never actually new Jesus while he was here on earth. And as he relates his mission on the road to Damascus and his encounter with a light and voice proclaiming itself the ascended master Jesus, that it was actually the power of the lord of earth Satan speaking to him.
The intent being to lead a man who persecuted early people of "the way" to believe through his (Satan's) wiles that he was Jesus. Because Paul being the adversary already to the teachings, would not have known any better. And this was the best vehicle by which Satan could lead people away from God, as his intentions always were and remain, by guiding a man opposed to the way in the beginning to serving his purposes by ministering his spirit to the unsuspecting.
Being Satan is the adversary or antithesis of God and Jesus' grace. And in this way his influence upon Paul as he pretended to be "the lord" (which was true as far as being the lord of the earth and not actually the Lord Christ) , would help to communicate through that emissary and thus false prophet a message that would result in people accepting on faith a doctrine that conflicted with that of the living Jesus and send people to Hell.
This is new to me so I had to ask more learned people who may have heard about this. It's disturbing to say the least. Especially if it's true that Paul's writings comprise most of the new testament of Christ!
I've searched the net seeking through various terms answers to my inquiry. While this is all new to me it certainly isn't in matters of online chatter about the very topic. i.e. Paul the false apostle. Paul the antichrist. Paul the Jew and Roman who was appointed to lead gentiles astray.
Questions like, why in all the Bible isn't there a "Book of Yeshua", as there are credited books authored by his Disciples. And why not him?
All these topics and queries abound on the net. So it's not new there at least. But for me I don't think there's enough time in a day to spare outside my personal responsibilities so as to let me peruse all that's available on this new topic.
It sounds weak and childish perhaps but it put a fright into me.
Has anyone heard anything like unto what I've share here?
What are your thoughts?
Is it odd that the man who didn't actually walk with Jesus while he was on earth is the foremost contributor to the new testament Christ was to deliver to the world?
Thank you for reading this rather long post. It came to mind to ask now as I'm rather new in the start of my journey with the Lord and hoping to find my way into discerning the voice of the Holy Spirit in my daily life. And now this confusion has dropped before my feet and since I don't know a lot about the bones of the matter, I wonder what I can trust as I pursue my goal in being more attuned to God's voice.
I realize I'm rambling now. The more I write the more comes to mind. I'll put a sock in it and hope for the best.
That he was the 13th Disciple who never actually new Jesus while he was here on earth. And as he relates his mission on the road to Damascus and his encounter with a light and voice proclaiming itself the ascended master Jesus, that it was actually the power of the lord of earth Satan speaking to him.
The intent being to lead a man who persecuted early people of "the way" to believe through his (Satan's) wiles that he was Jesus. Because Paul being the adversary already to the teachings, would not have known any better. And this was the best vehicle by which Satan could lead people away from God, as his intentions always were and remain, by guiding a man opposed to the way in the beginning to serving his purposes by ministering his spirit to the unsuspecting.
Being Satan is the adversary or antithesis of God and Jesus' grace. And in this way his influence upon Paul as he pretended to be "the lord" (which was true as far as being the lord of the earth and not actually the Lord Christ) , would help to communicate through that emissary and thus false prophet a message that would result in people accepting on faith a doctrine that conflicted with that of the living Jesus and send people to Hell.
This is new to me so I had to ask more learned people who may have heard about this. It's disturbing to say the least. Especially if it's true that Paul's writings comprise most of the new testament of Christ!
I've searched the net seeking through various terms answers to my inquiry. While this is all new to me it certainly isn't in matters of online chatter about the very topic. i.e. Paul the false apostle. Paul the antichrist. Paul the Jew and Roman who was appointed to lead gentiles astray.
Questions like, why in all the Bible isn't there a "Book of Yeshua", as there are credited books authored by his Disciples. And why not him?
All these topics and queries abound on the net. So it's not new there at least. But for me I don't think there's enough time in a day to spare outside my personal responsibilities so as to let me peruse all that's available on this new topic.
It sounds weak and childish perhaps but it put a fright into me.
Has anyone heard anything like unto what I've share here?
What are your thoughts?
Is it odd that the man who didn't actually walk with Jesus while he was on earth is the foremost contributor to the new testament Christ was to deliver to the world?
Thank you for reading this rather long post. It came to mind to ask now as I'm rather new in the start of my journey with the Lord and hoping to find my way into discerning the voice of the Holy Spirit in my daily life. And now this confusion has dropped before my feet and since I don't know a lot about the bones of the matter, I wonder what I can trust as I pursue my goal in being more attuned to God's voice.
I realize I'm rambling now. The more I write the more comes to mind. I'll put a sock in it and hope for the best.