Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Some people don't seem to understand that God's Word isn't all literal, and that figures of speech are used extensively.
There IS a reason God forbids us to represent Him with a graven image...
The only problem when reading God's word, is determining what and when something is to be taken literally and not, and then what you ascribe to the words that you selectively choose to take as non-literal. It becomes subjective, and we then also say, for our convenience, what we feel or think the words mean based on our biases or preconceived ideas. This is done all the time. Look at the subject of baptism: People go to great lengths to deny it and it's necessity relative to salvation, and come up with a myriad of dramatic reasons claiming that the words really don't mean what they clearly say. And those words regarding baptism shouldn't even be controversial, as opposed to those of a truly non-literal nature such as found throughout the book of Revelation. So, this problem also applies to the subject of this post. You can take the words literally or not, and if not, you can then come up with your own logic to explain what they really mean as opposed to what they plainly say or infer. I'm not saying one way or the other, I'm simply stating what the bible says. The fact of the matter is, no one really knows. It's simply an interesting observation to be considered.
Sure - absolutely. God could manifest in any form He chose. The absurdity (to me) is in thinking the Eternal Transcendent God who is Spirit, Light and Love actually (ontologically) has wings when all such descriptions in the Bible are obviously anthropomorphic.
I believe Him at His Word. And my experience proves His Word is true. He never said He was a chicken, just like Holy Spirit isn't a dove. That's your carnal mind trying to understand God.
Why do you perceive that as a limitation? If wings are a limitation, then so are eyes, ears, arms, hands, feet, etc.
Right - If God had eyes, arms, hands, feet. etc., those would all (IMO) be limitations on the Eterenal Transcendent Spirt who is the most perfect being of whom we can conceive. The basic concept is Divine Simplicity: "Divine simplicity is central to the classical Western concept of God. Simplicity denies any physical or metaphysical composition in the divine being. This means God is the divine nature itself and has no accidents (properties that are not necessary) accruing to his nature." See Divine Simplicity | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
If I understand what you said correctly (there were a lot of big polysyllabic words there, which a lawyer once told me is a characteristic fondness of most lawyers), the danger is in conflating a particular form or instance in which God chose to manifest Himself with the underlying reality of God. (The "ousia"; the Nicene fathers expressed the Trinity concept in Greek philosophical terms). Hence the 2nd Commandment prohibiting graven images applies to representing God in any form.
Err, I said that Jesus did NOT mean that he was a chicken, so why do you imply that I claimed that Jesus said he was a chicken? That's the exact opposite of what I wrote!
Christ became fully man (as well as fully God) and will show Himself in this manner with the wounds He suffered for our sakes as He did with the disciples. I think we know enough to keep us till we get to heaven and see and understand all these things..
I didn't make any such claim. I agreed that He isn't a chicken or a dove. And yet, He states in His Word that He has all these attributes. Don't forget, that God is spirit. And still yet, nothing is impossible with God. He isn't limited no matter what His spiritual attributes are. That is your carnal mind making that assumption. Jesus was God manifest in the flesh in form of a man with arms and legs (etc), and yet He was able to pass through crowds if He needed to. He isn't limited in the least.
Again you write, "That is your carnal mind making that assumption", yet I never made that assumption! Likewise you wrote, "He never said He was a chicken, ... That's your carnal mind trying to understand God.", yet I never claimed that Jesus said he was a chicken - I had written "he did not mean that he was a chicken" - the opposite of what you claimed I had assumed.
