JunChosen
Well-Known Member
What you meant is what YOU actually said.Go ahead... Ignore what was actually said.
I am cool! I am God's child and therefore loved by Him.Be cool... God loves you.
To God Be The Glory
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What you meant is what YOU actually said.Go ahead... Ignore what was actually said.
I am cool! I am God's child and therefore loved by Him.Be cool... God loves you.
I beg to differ!You do not understand the differences between what "works" means, and what one work Jesus said we need to do means.
The Pharisees and other religions assigned people to a long list of things to do in order to try to please God. That system was called "works."
Jesus said God gives us only ONE work to do. To "believe."
Believing equals FAITH.
Get it now?
Good insight.Romans 4 is good at explaining how salvation is of faith, that it might be according to grace and not of works.
What I get from good works is rewards, not salvation
Abraham Justified by Faith
1 What then shall we say that Abraham our father[a] has found according to the flesh? 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. 3 For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was [b]accounted to him for righteousness.” 4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted [c]as grace but as debt.
David Celebrates the Same Truth
5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works:
7 “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,
And whose sins are covered;
8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord shall not impute sin.”
Abraham Justified Before Circumcision
9 Does this blessedness then come upon the circumcised only, or upon the uncircumcised also? For we say that faith was accounted to Abraham for righteousness. 10 How then was it accounted? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised. 11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness might be imputed to them also, 12 and the father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also walk in the steps of the faith which our father Abraham had while still uncircumcised.
The Promise Granted Through Faith
13 For the promise that he would be the heir of the world was not to Abraham or to his seed through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if those who are of the law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise made of no effect, 15 because the law brings about wrath; for where there is no law there is no transgression.
16 Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be [d]sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all 17 (as it is written, “I have made you a father of many nations”) in the presence of Him whom he believed—God, who gives life to the dead and calls those things which do not exist as though they did; 18 who, contrary to hope, in hope believed, so that he became the father of many nations, according to what was spoken, “So shall your descendants be.” 19 And not being weak in faith, he did not consider his own body, already dead (since he was about a hundred years old), and the deadness of Sarah’s womb. 20 He did not waver at the promise of God through unbelief, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God, 21 and being fully convinced that what He had promised He was also able to perform. 22 And therefore “it was accounted to him for righteousness.”
23 Now it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to him, 24 but also for us. It shall be imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead, 25 who was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised because of our justification.
The confusion about works in the Bible, is due to the difference between the natural carnal minded man, and the spiritual man of faith in the Bible.Yes... there is confusion over the issue of works.
The Bible does not agree.Works is a system of prescribed deeds.... Believing is only 'one work.' Believing is not "works."
The one work of God is to sow faith in our hearts by hearing the gospel. This is the free gift of faith by hearing only. That is not the beleiving work we do that saves us.Works is a system of prescribed deeds.... Believing is only 'one work.' Believing is not "works."
That was the outward weakness of the law of Moses on stone; however, God still spoke of the inward purifying works of our heart, that we must do by circumcising the foreskin of our heart and not just the flesh."Works" was understood when the Bible was written to mean something specific to their religious culture.
Which leads to all the works of faith He commands to do. And that begins within the heart and spirit of a man.The rabbis and Pharisees would prescribe their lists of works to do to be saved for their followers to do.
That is why Jews kept asking Jesus what works they must do to inherit eternal life.
Jesus said?
God prescribes only one work -"to believe."
Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”
grace and peace ..............
Throwing out passages without understanding, but ones that contain 'keywords,' does not prove your point.The confusion about works in the Bible, is due to the difference between the natural carnal minded man, and the spiritual man of faith in the Bible.
With the world, the natural man defines works only as outward deeds. The Bible teaches our inward works of thoughts, intents, and imaginations of the heart and spirit.
These are the works that carnal minded Christians do not discern, when trying to teach about faith and works. They can separate all works from their faith at any time, so long as they are not doing anything outwardly.
That's why they do not comprehend James 2 teaching there is no such thing as faith without works. They are only thinking of outward deeds. But the Bible speaks of our inward deeds also.
The Bible does not agree.
He fashioneth their hearts alike; he considereth all their works.
God judges all our works, including those of the heart first, whether lusting, evil surmising, vain imaginations, and idolatry.
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
These works include the heart where Jesus is tempted in all points, yet resists the devil within for him to flee. This is the works of spiritual warfare in the spirit and mind, that we must also do.
Your sentence structure needs a little tweaking. You mean Peter warns anyone about messing with Paul's words to their own destruction. Just like any other words of God in the Bible.God had Peter to clearly warn us about some of Paul’s writing. (2Peter:3:15-16) (v.15)
From the beginning God talks about the physical things that man already sees, and also reveals the spiritual things man became blinded too. He speaks of the Spirit in Gen 1:2, and of man being made in His image in 1:I believe this is the confusion, Because Paul talks about two types of deaths. Paul talks about two types of works. Paul talks about two different laws that use to work together.
Naw, my sentences needs no structural tweaking, but yes your are correct the words came from Peter. For example Jesus says in John 14: 19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also. 20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. So when you truly doing the will of God, keeping his commandments, statues and judgements, you are connected as the word is written.Your sentence structure needs a little tweaking. You mean Peter warns anyone about messing with Paul's words to their own destruction. Just like any other words of God in the Bible.
The scripture that came to my mind while reading this part is in Isaiah 29: 9-13There are some Christians that don't believe all the words of God, and instead think they're just the writings of men. In this way they can act like Paul got it wrong somewhere, or Peter elsewhere, etc... It was the same case back then, so that God in 2 Peter had to let all of us know that He was speaking through Paul as well in all his writings.
From the beginning God talks about the physical things that man already sees, and also reveals the spiritual things man became blinded too. He speaks of the Spirit in Gen 1:2, and of man being made in His image in 1:
It's only the unbelieving natural man that remains blind to the spiritual things, that are more important and eternal than the natural. Sometimes we Christians make the same error by reading the Bible with natural eyes only. When reading the Bible we can forget we are reading the only Book in the world of perfect spiritual understanding.
Your argument is not entirely convincing because it assumes that if the apostles instruct us to obey the gospel, they mean every form of obedience. For example, adhering to the speed limit or crossing the street with a green light does not necessarily equate to obeying the gospel. Similarly, mixing polyester with cotton does not necessarily mean disobeying the gospel.There's a real angst among some Christians about being justified by works, so that faith with works can never be even mentioned as part of being saved.
And so, we can call it believing with obedience. Afterall, we are commanded to repent and believe the gospel, and obey the gospel.
Therefore, we are commanded not only to believe the gospel, but to obey the gospel of Jesus Christ. The Bible teaches we are to believe the gospel with obedience, not with believing alone.
And certainly not believing with disobedience. Disobedient faith is not that of Jesus, but of the world. The devil teaches believing in disobeying God with eternal life.
And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
That is the gospel of believing without obedience and having faith disobediently unto everlasting life.
If you say so. A simple 'nah-ah' would suffice.Throwing out passages without understanding, but ones that contain 'keywords,' does not prove your point.
Well then?If you say so. A simple 'nah-ah' would suffice.
Ok. So are you saying that Peter warned about Paul's words, as though they needed guarding against, as if they may not be from God?Naw, my sentences needs no structural tweaking, but yes your are correct the words came from Peter.
For example Jesus says in John 14: 19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also. 20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. So when you truly doing the will of God, keeping his commandments, statues and judgements, you are connected as the word is written.
Good verse to apply to it.The scripture that came to my mind while reading this part is in Isaiah 29: 9-13
Well then?
Next time when you have no answer? Instead of throwing out passages that do not correlate to what is really being said, just to look impressive?
Paul talks about two types of laws, works, and deaths. Most people get confuse or taught that both laws are the same, or do not understand how they use to work together. When the bible speaks of laws we no longer have to keep, it is speaking of the sacrificial laws and Priesthood laws. These laws were a school master pointing us to the fact that Jesus would be sacrificed for our sins. Since Jesus died we are no longer under a school master, (required to offer up bulls and goats for our sins).Ok. So are you saying that Peter warned about Paul's words, as though they needed guarding against, as if they may not be from God?
Or do you mean we are all warned against misreading apostolic words, and just because we don't immediately understand them, we still shouldn't change them to fit our understanding?
True. The whole Christian concept of being justified by agreeing with the words of God alone, is failure to be justified with God by doing His will. The Lord doesn't care about being agreed with, but being obeyed.
Good verse to apply to it.
True. The whole Christian concept of being justified by agreeing with the words of God alone, is failure to be justified with God by doing His will. The Lord doesn't care about being agreed with, but being obeyed.
Obey what God says, and not do what He says is sinning.What does it mean to obey the gospel?
True, as well as any works of our own without Christ. The Bible conversion is with all old past life forgiven and passed away.However, Paul did not disagree with James since Paul was discussing "works of the Law,"
True. The lovers of God and not of their own selves, are not loving God with works, just to be justified with Him, but we certainly are not justified with Him without the works. His justifying approval is not given without doing the obedient work of faith.which are regulations and customs performed not to express faith but to show obedience. Paul declares that God is justifying those of faith who are not leaning on obedience to rules and regulations for approval.
It is to me, that's why I do it and seek to obey God whenever I know to.Your argument is not entirely convincing
True, and that form of obedience brought by Jesus Christ is within the platter first, and also outwardly. Not just outwardly as a Pharisee with outward righteousness only.because it assumes that if the apostles instruct us to obey the gospel, they mean every form of obedience.
Obeying the ordinance of man is commanded in the gospel. However, in that regard, a matter of conscience is also called upon, such as when we ought to obey God and not man. (Acts 5)For example, adhering to the speed limit or crossing the street with a green light does not necessarily equate to obeying the gospel.
I'm a NT Christian. Not an OT saint.Similarly, mixing polyester with cotton does not necessarily mean disobeying the gospel.
Principles are nothing, if disobeying in the deeds. They're as useless to save and justify the soul, as faith while sinning with the devil.Living according to the principles of behavior that logically follow from the gospel message is what it means to obey the gospel.
Agree. From the heart.The gospel teaches us that if we believe in God's son Jesus Christ, He is willing to forgive our sins. However, Christ also teaches us that if we are unwilling to forgive our brother, then God will not forgive us. Therefore, for us to receive God's forgiveness, we must forgive others as well. This is what it means to obey the gospel concerning forgiveness.
So then, let's look at a passage of scripture that reflects this point of view.
Paul opens his second epistle to the Thessalonians with this.
2 Thessalonians 1:3-4
We ought always to give thanks to God for you, brethren, as is only fitting, because your faith is greatly enlarged, and the love of each one of you toward one another grows ever greater; therefore, we ourselves speak proudly of you among the churches of God for your perseverance and faith in the midst of all your persecutions and afflictions which you endure.
The gospel instructs us to show our allegiance to Jesus by loving one another. It also teaches that those who love him will sacrifice this life for the next by carrying their own cross. In this passage, the apostle praises the Thessalonians for their selfless actions towards their fellow believers despite facing persecution for their faith. They display a genuine love for their brethren and are willing to suffer for their sake, even at the cost of their own lives. Following the faith means actively living out its principles.
Right. The only way to be justified by Christ is by works, and not by faith alone.From my perspective, James was referring to "works" in a certain way.
Once again, you missed John's point. He makes reference to "when we see him", which places our perfection at the Second Coming of Christ. This is in agreement with Paul's statement that the sting of sin and death will be conquered at the Seventh Trumpet.The Bible newborn conversion of Jesus Christ, is being born anew to become even as He was in this life. (1 John 4:17) The Bible race of endurance unto the end is walking as He walked.
As I demonstrated, your view of perfection is not based on the New Testament.The Christian doctrine of incomplete conversion, where we are still sinning before, after, and through conversion, is not that of the Bible, but that of Christian religion. And so, such Christian good deeds 'following' are in effect the same filthy rags as before. Some of them even confess as much. (Though they think they're being 'humble' about it.)
No. The one does not necessarily follow from the other. Many Christian men, including Paul the Apostle, have lust in their hearts but do not act on that lust; they have, as Paul recommended, given their members in service of righteousness instead. Refer to Romans 6 and 7.So long as the old sinning continues with lust in the heart, then so continues the life of filthy rags as well.
Posting an alleged teaching from the Bible by making spurious arguments based on redefinitions of words must be met with counterarguments that challenge the meaning of words and how language works to communicate ideas.Look, all this parsing of doctrines, and maneuverings of words, etc... are all just intellectual exercise to God.
I respectfully disagree. You do more than repeat the words.All I do here is teach the Bible by repeating the words as they are, and show if any Christian teaching, doctrine, gospel, prophecy, etc... is different from the words of the Bible.