It's not an argument, but a common sense reading of words and their context.This is essentially your argument:
"The word "until" implies Joseph certainly did know her after Christ was born:"
"And he knew her not until she brought forth her firstborn son..." (Matt. 1:25)
I find it fascinating that the Bible is the only book on earth, where otherwise reasonable readers apply normal grammatical skills in order to better understand the intent of the authors. But with the Bible, such simple reasoning and skills are checked at the door, for the sole purpose of changing what the Author is plainly saying.
It's because it's God's word, and some readers want to change it to fit their own doctrinal faith and lives.
As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
This isn't even something remotely hard to understand but quite simple. The nature of false teaching of the Bible is to make the understandable into confusion.
For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
A great rule of thumb for Bible teaching, is if a child can understand it from the words written. Little children have yet to learn the dark art of manipulating simple things for the purpose of introducing mysterious things.
Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
I showed you already how God uses the word two different ways in the Bible. If you're either not going to read what I write, or just ignore my points made, then I'm not going to repeat myself for you.Therefore, according to your logic, you should also argue the following:
"The word "until" implies Michal certainly did have children after she died:"
“Michal the daughter of Saul had no children until the day of her death.” (2 Sam. 6:23)
You can back and apply it to this case also.
Repeating yourself doesn't make anything more true. I've already responded to this sufficiently for myself.In Matt. 1:20-24, Matthew speaks about the ways in which the long-awaited messianic prophecy has come to fruition, such as Joseph accepting as his spouse the virgin who conceived the Savior of mankind by the Holy Spirit. In Matt. 1:25, he reiterates and reinforces that the Savior was truly begotten by the Holy Spirit, and born of the virgin Mary, by referring to a specific period where Joseph didn't have sexual intercourse with Mary that would dispel any belief the Savior was conceived by him and not the Holy Spirit, nor born of a virgin: pre-birth of the Savior. Again, Matthew referring to that specific period for that reason doesn't indicate whether Joseph and Mary did or didn't have sexual intercourse post-birth of the Savior, and thus your claim this argument implies Joseph and Mary didn't have sexual intercourse post-birth of the Savior is false.
It's not a 'belief' but a simple reading of the narrative. Neither God nor I need to write the obvious in order to please the naysayers.I'd suggest you provide another verse that supports your belief that Joseph and Mary had sexual intercourse,
You've decided it would be sin for Mary and Joseph to be a married couple having sex, so as not to taint your Mary with 'sacred womb'.but I won't because I know you can't, as I also know Joseph and Mary decided to be mutually chaste in their marriage for God.
The Mary myth is really just a Christianized rip-off of Rome's Mother Vesta with Sacred Fire.
It was done when the old Roman religion was replaced with the Christian religion by Constantine as the state religion. Some of the defunct priests of Rome successfully persuaded some Christian bishops, and other likeminded fable-lovers of mystery, to incorporate it into their newly dominant state religion.
No doubt it was partly justified under a delusional notion of charity and fairplay, in order to make former enemies into new bedmates.