LUKE 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed ) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli,
LUKE 3:24 Which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi, which was [the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Janna, which was [the son] of Joseph,
LUKE 3:25 Which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Amos, which was [the son] of Naum, which was [the son] of Esli, which was [the son] of Nagge,
LUKE 3:26 Which was [the son] of Maath, which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Semei, which was [the son] of Joseph, which was [the son] of Juda,
LUKE 3:27 Which was [the son] of Joanna, which was [the son] of Rhesa, which was [the son] of Zorobabel, which was [the son] of Salathiel, which was [the son] of Neri,
LUKE 3:28 Which was [the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Addi, which was [the son] of Cosam, which was [the son] of Elmodam, which was [the son] of Er,
LUKE 3:29 Which was [the son] of Jose, which was [the son] of Eliezer, which was [the son] of Jorim, which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi,
LUKE 3:30 Which was [the son] of Simeon, which was [the son] of Juda, which was [the son] of Joseph, which was [the son] of Jonan, which was [the son] of Eliakim,
LUKE 3:31 Which was [the son] of Melea, which was [the son] of Menan, which was [the son] of Mattatha, which was [the son] of Nathan, which was [the son] of David,
..................
..................
Translated (a portion of women are included) (Numbers 26 Excerpt)
NUMBERS 26:10 And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.
NUMBERS 26:11 Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not.
NUMBERS 26:12 The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:
NUMBERS 26:13 Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.
NUMBERS 26:14 These [are] the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred.
NUMBERS 26:15 The children of Gad after their families: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites: of Haggi, the family of the Haggites: of Shuni, the family of the Shunites:
NUMBERS 26:16 Of Ozni, the family of the Oznites: of Eri, the family of the Erites:
NUMBERS 26:17 Of Arod, the family of the Arodites: of Areli, the family of the Arelites.
NUMBERS 26:18 These [are] the families of the children of Gad according to those that were numbered of them, forty thousand and five hundred.
NUMBERS 26:19 The sons of Judah [were] Er and Onan: and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan.
NUMBERS 26:20 And the sons of Judah after their families were; of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites: of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites: of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.
NUMBERS 26:21 And the sons of Pharez were; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.
..................
..................
"Joseph" is included in the Genealogy, and it appears to share some of the language, "the daughters of Joseph".............there are people that believe, the "antichrist" was or is a women, not a man...............and they base this claim on Luke's Genealogy.
Apart of the reason is, we know that "joseph" is removed from matthew's genealogy, which features solomon, and "ephraim (jacob's unclean son, or the moabites/J*ws)..................in otherwords if God uses a women then it or she would be listed in lukes genealogy and the bible would have evidences of that since that language is generally doubled.
The legal claim most people say is that "Joseph represents a Women", but in reality Joseph is just a description of the lord or a blessing. Then they look for ties of this as evidence in the old testament, since a women did not have authority then, they read some of the old testament language as a prophecy for a women in power at the end of time............which they generally call a "antichrist".
This is not a perfect argument.................its just a legal argument, why do they say a "women is antichrist or the antichrist" if this is an invalid statement?
The reason is that:::::::::::::::::
1. jesus and mother mary, with joseph in matthew, when "joseph" is rebuked or disappointed by the generations that wasted joseph (for that reason they were blind) (matthew's genealogy)
2. (mother mary with joseph is ABSCENT) when "joseph" is included without rebuke or disappointment by the generations, not recorded as wasting joseph (or being foolish with god's mercies (lukes genealogy)
...............
...............
If Number 1 applied to "women as antichrist", then another women at the end of time would be involved in the second coming of jesus........(where as Jesus is technically seen as his own mother) (Jesus took on the role of flesh and blood, but he didn't have a blood father or mother, that is parabolic language)
If Number 2 applied to "women as antichrist", when a women would come with miracles, it would not be miracles as a result of the earth's field or noah's rainbow, which is tied to the dead flesh accusation (or ezekiel's bones of the removed tribes genetic lines in revelation)
We don't have a Women that claims to be the mother of Jesus today, or a Women that brings forth Jesus.............and we don't have a Women performing Miracles............
(a pyramid builder, or a son of man under joseph is not necessarily called a "women", that is a separate argument that is inview in this disucssion)
(this may actually play a role in the figure of "1260" the gospel uses, just haven't given it much thought)
LUKE 3:24 Which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi, which was [the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Janna, which was [the son] of Joseph,
LUKE 3:25 Which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Amos, which was [the son] of Naum, which was [the son] of Esli, which was [the son] of Nagge,
LUKE 3:26 Which was [the son] of Maath, which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Semei, which was [the son] of Joseph, which was [the son] of Juda,
LUKE 3:27 Which was [the son] of Joanna, which was [the son] of Rhesa, which was [the son] of Zorobabel, which was [the son] of Salathiel, which was [the son] of Neri,
LUKE 3:28 Which was [the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Addi, which was [the son] of Cosam, which was [the son] of Elmodam, which was [the son] of Er,
LUKE 3:29 Which was [the son] of Jose, which was [the son] of Eliezer, which was [the son] of Jorim, which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi,
LUKE 3:30 Which was [the son] of Simeon, which was [the son] of Juda, which was [the son] of Joseph, which was [the son] of Jonan, which was [the son] of Eliakim,
LUKE 3:31 Which was [the son] of Melea, which was [the son] of Menan, which was [the son] of Mattatha, which was [the son] of Nathan, which was [the son] of David,
..................
..................
Translated (a portion of women are included) (Numbers 26 Excerpt)
NUMBERS 26:10 And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.
NUMBERS 26:11 Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not.
NUMBERS 26:12 The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:
NUMBERS 26:13 Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.
NUMBERS 26:14 These [are] the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred.
NUMBERS 26:15 The children of Gad after their families: of Zephon, the family of the Zephonites: of Haggi, the family of the Haggites: of Shuni, the family of the Shunites:
NUMBERS 26:16 Of Ozni, the family of the Oznites: of Eri, the family of the Erites:
NUMBERS 26:17 Of Arod, the family of the Arodites: of Areli, the family of the Arelites.
NUMBERS 26:18 These [are] the families of the children of Gad according to those that were numbered of them, forty thousand and five hundred.
NUMBERS 26:19 The sons of Judah [were] Er and Onan: and Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan.
NUMBERS 26:20 And the sons of Judah after their families were; of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites: of Pharez, the family of the Pharzites: of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites.
NUMBERS 26:21 And the sons of Pharez were; of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites: of Hamul, the family of the Hamulites.
..................
..................
"Joseph" is included in the Genealogy, and it appears to share some of the language, "the daughters of Joseph".............there are people that believe, the "antichrist" was or is a women, not a man...............and they base this claim on Luke's Genealogy.
Apart of the reason is, we know that "joseph" is removed from matthew's genealogy, which features solomon, and "ephraim (jacob's unclean son, or the moabites/J*ws)..................in otherwords if God uses a women then it or she would be listed in lukes genealogy and the bible would have evidences of that since that language is generally doubled.
The legal claim most people say is that "Joseph represents a Women", but in reality Joseph is just a description of the lord or a blessing. Then they look for ties of this as evidence in the old testament, since a women did not have authority then, they read some of the old testament language as a prophecy for a women in power at the end of time............which they generally call a "antichrist".
This is not a perfect argument.................its just a legal argument, why do they say a "women is antichrist or the antichrist" if this is an invalid statement?
The reason is that:::::::::::::::::
1. jesus and mother mary, with joseph in matthew, when "joseph" is rebuked or disappointed by the generations that wasted joseph (for that reason they were blind) (matthew's genealogy)
2. (mother mary with joseph is ABSCENT) when "joseph" is included without rebuke or disappointment by the generations, not recorded as wasting joseph (or being foolish with god's mercies (lukes genealogy)
...............
...............
If Number 1 applied to "women as antichrist", then another women at the end of time would be involved in the second coming of jesus........(where as Jesus is technically seen as his own mother) (Jesus took on the role of flesh and blood, but he didn't have a blood father or mother, that is parabolic language)
If Number 2 applied to "women as antichrist", when a women would come with miracles, it would not be miracles as a result of the earth's field or noah's rainbow, which is tied to the dead flesh accusation (or ezekiel's bones of the removed tribes genetic lines in revelation)
We don't have a Women that claims to be the mother of Jesus today, or a Women that brings forth Jesus.............and we don't have a Women performing Miracles............
(a pyramid builder, or a son of man under joseph is not necessarily called a "women", that is a separate argument that is inview in this disucssion)
(this may actually play a role in the figure of "1260" the gospel uses, just haven't given it much thought)
Last edited:
