Scott Downey
Well-Known Member
Giants came in different sizes, some much larger. Common sized giants up to 6 meters, others maybe 100 foot like as tall trees. And how else could those 1200 ton stone blocks and Obelisks be quarried and lifted up without breaking under their own weight.That's a fair question. The conspiracy is that it has been suppressed, but who knows? Depending on the environment, bones can last for decades or longer. Under ideal conditions, they could last centuries, but even bones don't last forever. Foziliation is even more rare. Of all the dinosaurs that have ever lived, only a small fraction have been fossilized. Another factor is that we don't know how many giants there were or how widespread they were; this could also make finding their remains more difficult.
Reversing Hermon by Mike S. Heiser is an interesting read. The first-century Jews were well aware of the Book of Enoch, and it had quite an impact on their theology. Jude and 2 Peter quote directly from it, but its influence can be found all throughout the New Testament if you do a deep dive into it. I don't consider it to be divinely inspired, but it is useful as commentary.
Baalbek stones were also massive, but several large giants could have moved and placed them and honestly archaeologists have no idea how people did that.

Baalbek’s Stone of the Pregnant Woman: How Was This 1000-Ton Megalith Moved?!
One of the biggest feats of Roman ingenuity lies in Lebanon’s historic Bekaa Valley, home to the ancient city of Heliopolis, now Baalbek.

Book of Enoch was familiar to the early apostles, and they used quotes from it in the scriptures, meaning they believed it to be inspired at least in part or they would not have quoted those prophecies in their letters to the churches. And the churches also would have not accepted such quotes from the book as scripture if those early church people did not believe the same as the apostles. Which mean the early church believed some of it inspired by God. That is my thinking. Reason it was not part of scriptural canon is the entire work's provenance is unproven, it's origin cannot be established with enough certainty. So, it is an apocryphal work like many other books not included. It is however an interesting read.
Last edited: