Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved (general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely necessary for salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief, not on a lack of baptism. So salvation rests on belief. *NOWHERE does the Bible say "baptized or condemned."
If water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then why did Jesus not mention it in the following verses? (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26). What is the one requirement that Jesus mentions nine different times in each of these complete statements? *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.
John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
I have not claimed that Baptism is absolutely required for salvation (see post #34)
It is what Jesus has given us for the normal way to be saved - "He who believes and is baptized will be saved".
God may choose to save us without baptism in water but that is his choice not ours.
An example might be someone who is on his way to be baptised but is killed on the way. He has the desire to be baptised but was unable to be. The Catholic Church calls this Baptism of Desire where God will give the fruits of (water) baptism - salvation - without actually being baptised in water.