(adren@line;45014)
lol.I find it amusing that you make grandiose comments on Buddhism when you do not know anything about it and then accuse me of not "digging deeper", or "lacking research".The fact is that no-one in their right mind thinks that Buddhism is a plagiarism of the OT. This is a wacky conspiracy theory akin to other wacky conspiracy theories.The only difference between your theory and those theories is at least those theories have some some-what reasonable arguments and some evidence, although ultimately flawed. You, on the other-hand, have a statement, an un-informed opinion, and no evidence. I find it amusing that you try compensate for your lack of scientific, religious, and philosophical knowledge by mentioning something about the civil war. Sorry, but that doesn't work. You may indeed know quite a bit about the civil war, perhaps more than I. But last time I checked, we are on a religious forum discussing religion, philosophy, science, and religious history.
You are right, I do know alot about the Civil War, much more than the History books contibute. I have already shown you that much of what makes up Buddhism is found in the OT. It is not necessarily the faith of the OT, but it is found there. I showed you the evidence and you ignore it, do I need to quote the OT to make my point? Come now, it is there if you are willing to look. I wasnt trying to compensate for anything, I was trying to see your willingness to actually do some research. Your answer would have told me you level of ability in deserning truth from fiction. I will give you a hint, It wasnt slavery. Yes that was a small part but not the main reason.Seriously, lets do some research together. You pick the topic, and I will research it if i dont already know anything about it. And by the way, I was a Buddhist and it didnt work for me, that why I tell you to dig deeper there is more there that what you think.
lol.I find it amusing that you make grandiose comments on Buddhism when you do not know anything about it and then accuse me of not "digging deeper", or "lacking research".The fact is that no-one in their right mind thinks that Buddhism is a plagiarism of the OT. This is a wacky conspiracy theory akin to other wacky conspiracy theories.The only difference between your theory and those theories is at least those theories have some some-what reasonable arguments and some evidence, although ultimately flawed. You, on the other-hand, have a statement, an un-informed opinion, and no evidence. I find it amusing that you try compensate for your lack of scientific, religious, and philosophical knowledge by mentioning something about the civil war. Sorry, but that doesn't work. You may indeed know quite a bit about the civil war, perhaps more than I. But last time I checked, we are on a religious forum discussing religion, philosophy, science, and religious history.
You are right, I do know alot about the Civil War, much more than the History books contibute. I have already shown you that much of what makes up Buddhism is found in the OT. It is not necessarily the faith of the OT, but it is found there. I showed you the evidence and you ignore it, do I need to quote the OT to make my point? Come now, it is there if you are willing to look. I wasnt trying to compensate for anything, I was trying to see your willingness to actually do some research. Your answer would have told me you level of ability in deserning truth from fiction. I will give you a hint, It wasnt slavery. Yes that was a small part but not the main reason.Seriously, lets do some research together. You pick the topic, and I will research it if i dont already know anything about it. And by the way, I was a Buddhist and it didnt work for me, that why I tell you to dig deeper there is more there that what you think.