Infallible

[GracePeace]

The thread about "Mary, the New Eve" had to be closed due to excessive bullying on your part. This thread is a continuation of a closed thread so you are just looking for a fight.

Not that you care about truth--people don't, by and large--but you misunderstood.
That thread was closed because of the misbehavior of the other users which was being reported.
I have chosen not to report their misbehavior now so that we can continue.
There ya go. I'm sure you'll respect the truth.

You try to pit Jimmy Akin (a respected apologist) against BoL (who got temporarily banned and you didn't even get a warning) which proves the bias of certain mods are in your favor.

If he got banned, he must've gotten banned for "bullying" someone else.
I had decided to stop reporting him--I wanted to continue the convo here.

It also proves your reading is highly selective. Your rants also prove you reject biblical pre-figurements and typology, and your red neck theology dismisses or ignores the accepted, unanimous ECF, and when it comes to development of doctrine, you haven't got a clue.

"Red neck" : bigoted, "biased" epithet. Hypocrisy on your part.
Not that it matters. Such things do not matter for "defenders of truth".
Now, "Mary as New Eve" shows the ECFs were clueless since they contradict Scripture.
Psalm 119:99 I have more insight than all my teachers, For Your testimonies are my meditation.
They should've considered Scripture more, not tradition.
Not my fault they got it wrong.

Understanding "Mary as the New Eve" and the Immaculate Conception takes time, study, prayer and humility, hence the excessive pasting, and I am just getting started. I won't put you on ignore yet, I'll let you hang yourself with your own rope.

It takes brainwashing to ignore Scripture.
Mr. Akin knows the power of the arguments I've raised.
Mary is not and never has been New Eve.
"Y'all" (I'm a "red neck", after all, right?) failed to teach the Church as New Eve.
You lied, taught falsehood, both by omission and by commission.