Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This guy lays out a good argument for Jesus's return in 70 AD.
Jesus did come in judgement in that generation like He said that he would which proved that He was God.
He is creating in your mind a story line to lead you down his way of thinking.
I don’t know what to make of all of it.
Easy enough for you to look it up on your own.
Correction 41,000 worldwide.
Go with the Bible not with the preterist who is not going with the Bible.
Did you watch the video?
Brother, there are some here well familiar with men's doctrines of Preterism so that it is easily recognized by subject. So those don't have to listen to yet another speaker pushing the false idea. The Bible witness is True, so that no one needs convincing by men. And that is what those in Christ are required to do, check out a matter in God's written Word, and let it be our Witness of what is false, and what is True.
post #50, they teach the resurrection is past.Ok. So what's the best biblical argument against preterism?
post #50, they teach the resurrection is past.
quoted
We believe Scripture teaches Christ would come again in that first century generation while some of His original disciples were still alive, to raise the dead, change the living, and catch up both groups together into the heavenly presence of Christ.
Paul warns us about that error, them as false teachers
2 Timothy 2
14 Remind them of these things, charging them before the Lord not to [d]strive about words to no profit, to the ruin of the hearers. 15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 16 But shun profane and [e]idle babblings, for they will [f]increase to more ungodliness. 17 And their message will spread like cancer. Hymenaeus and Philetus are of this sort, 18 who have strayed concerning the truth, saying that the resurrection is already past; and they overthrow the faith of some. 19 Nevertheless the solid foundation of God stands, having this seal: “The Lord knows those who are His,” and, “Let everyone who names the name of [g]Christ depart from iniquity.”
It’s not an assumption. It’s based on the vast majority of dictionaries, lexicons, biblical commentaries, and English translations recognizing genea means a generation, as in a group of people living that the same time, in the context of the Olivet discourse.
Depending upon the translation we use, depends on whether or not Matt 16:28 has been linked by the translation with the Transfiguration Passage.
However, Matt 17:1 suggests that there are six days separating Matt 16:24-28 from Matt 17:1-13 whereas Luke 9:28 suggests that eight days are separating these two recorded events.
Because the two recorded passages have a time gap between them, I would suggest that contextually that they are not linked in any way.
Shalom
It’s not an assumption. It’s based on the vast majority of dictionaries, lexicons, biblical commentaries, and English translations recognizing genea means a generation, as in a group of people living that the same time, in the context of the Olivet discourse.