Is a woman required to cover her head today?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

doctrox

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2018
1,119
824
113
worldwide
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
The OP is nearly three years old and its premise has been thoroughly addressed. Its author hasn't been seen onsite for 15 months. Perhaps it is permissible to divert to your Kittel comments for the edification of the readership.

[Kittel] did not collaborate with the Nazis in the holocaust.
He did.

Let's catch up in the kitchen while we fry Kittel's kettle of fish.

Nearly 90 years ago, the Fuerher and his friend Kittel coined the term," Positive Christianity." Gerhard Kittel and Hitler worked together to hawk the Root-race theory to the last generation.

The 'Nazi connection' will shock Christians of even nominal sensitivities. Adolf Hitler's name is a household word, used synonymously with the consummate evil of this century. Gerhard Kittel's name is a household word - among New Testament Greek scholars. It would seem the chasm between two such men would be monumental. Kittel edited the ten volume standard reference work used in New Testament Greek word studies, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. The NIV translators relied on its judgements when selecting words, as do all translators.1 When a pastor or 'media preacher' elaborates with reference to 'the Greek', it is virtually certain he is citing a judgement about the correct meaning or choice of a word from this dictionary or an abridged compendium which has adopted its citations.

Kittel's labors on his ten volume Greek New Testament dictionary also began the same year he became Hitler's 'hired man'.

As previously mentioned, Kittel's trial, conviction and imprisonment for his key part in the extermination of two thirds of Europe's Jewish population is a harsh fact, hidden to those pridefully seeking 'hidden' meaning in the Greek. This same pride impels New Age mystics in their pursuit of hidden 'gnosis' or knowledge.

Adolf Hitler hired Kittel to curse the seed of Israel in Germany. The apostle Peter warns of these 'false prophets' and 'false teachers' who are "gone astray following the way of Balaam...who loved the wages of unrighteousness...[T]hey speak great swelling words of vanity." (II Peter 2:1, 15) A more apt description of Kittel's dictionary and his diatribe against the Jews could not be penned.

In Gerhard Kittel, Satan found a man who could destroy both the seed of Israel and the "incorruptible seed." His writings penned between 1937 and 1943 caused the physical death of countless Jews and spiritual death for untold others. Using the cloak of 'Christianity' and 'science', Kittel was the chief architect of the so-called 'racial science' and 'Christian base' for Hitler's anti-Semitism. Scholar Robert Ericksen, winner of the 1987 Merit of Distinction from the International Center for Holocaust Studies, writes, "He established a solid Christian foundation for the opposition to the Jews."2 Kittel called himself "the first authority in Germany in the scientific consideration of the Jewish question."3 William Foxwell Albright, a prominent archaeologist and Semitic scholar, writes:

Kittel is...even darker and more menacing...than Goering or Goebbels...[He credits Kittel with]...the grim distinction of making extermination of the Jews theologically respectable.4

The NKJV and all new versions have abandoned the traditional Old Testament Hebrew, Ben Chayyim Masoretic Text, and follow Rudolph Kittel's 1937 corruption, Biblia Hebraica, which follows Leningrad Ms B 19a.

Kittel, unlike theologians Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, urged:

[A]greement with the state and Fuhrer was obedience toward the law of God.5

Theologian Martin Buber responded publicly that he was not surprised to see Kittel acting as pied piper for the Fuehrer.5

Ericksen notes further:

Theologians who stressed gospel...tended to be immune to Hitler's charms. Kittel's work cannot be seen as anything but a satanic distortion of Christianity.6

Foreshadowing the final false prophet, Kittel promoted a 'New' bible version for Hitler's 'New' church, to replace Luther's traditional German Bible, Die Heilige Schrift, based on the Majority Text.7

In 1933 Kittel joined the Nazi party and his mystical maze hit a turning point. That same year he also began work on the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, a work he hoped would give theology a more secular substructure. One secular historian notes:

The potential for trouble suddenly became concrete in 1933. Ego involvement...must have played a role in Kittel's career after 1933. After 1933 Kittel's work changed in tone. Before 1933 Kittel defended Judaism, afterward he attacked it. Kittel produced a body of work between 1933 and 1944 filled with hatred and slander toward Jews...The bulk of Kittel's research between 1933 and 1945 was devoted to a rigorous and harsh anti-Jewish stance...It corresponded to the worst of Nazi propaganda.8

In 1933 Kittel wrote a book and gave speeches entitled, Die Judenfragen. It's first edition states:

We must not allow ourselves to be crippled because the whole world screams at us of barbarism...How the German Volk regulates its own cultural affairs does not concern anyone else in the world.9

Between 1933 and 1944, as Kittel was cranking out volume after volume of the lengthy Theological Dictionary, he was also taking a leadership role in the Forschungsabteilung Judenfrage, a Nazi organization and publication. Rudolf Hess, one of the earliest members of the Occult Thule Society and Hitler's right hand man, attended the opening ceremonies, which were followed by newspaper headlines pronouncing the organization as, "[T]he scientific weapon in the Nazi fight against the Jews."10 Kittel became the most frequent contributor to this journal, writing 6 of the 8 volumes, the last being cut short by the end of the war and Kittel's imprisonment for war crimes. (The same fate fell to his closing work on the Theological Dictionary.)

Kittel's pseudo-'science' and 'research' for this journal stooped to the ridiculous. For example, he would show ancient drawings of men with "large hooked noses" having sex with women who had small noses. These drawings, he purported, "proved" scientifically that historically "inferior" Jewish men had attempted to mate with "superior" Aryan women in order to improve their racial stock. Kittel's vulgarity included slander and name-calling, using terms such as, "refuse," "depraved" and "enemies of humanity." He wrote of "readiness to speak in racial...terms" and of the Jews being "justly ruined." He recommended all German Jews be dismissed from their jobs, stripped of their German citizenship and their property confiscated. He said, "[T]hough this would cause hardship it was a necessary price to pay for past excesses."11 Doesn't this sound like the Antichrist's plan for the 'unevolved' non-compliant Christians who refuse to take 'the Name' of the beast? The same plan comes from the same source - Satan.

Dr. Josef Goebbels, Minister of Propaganda and Enlightenment, believed Hitler was the reincarnation of Jesus Christ. Goebbels and his SS began the first mass murder of German-Jewry on November 9 and 10, 1938. In 1939, Kittel closed one of his speeches with a tribute to Hitler calling him the, "saving force which stemmed the tide of Jewish infiltration."12 "Knowledge of the killings was widespread within Germany itself," notes one observer. As early as 1942, the London Times reported the mass murder of Jews; Swedish diplomat Baron von Otter also publicly reported mass gassings. The B.B.C. reported the massacre by A.M. and short wave radio. "They all knew what was going on."13 Even with such clear awareness of what was going on, Kittel continued to write for the Fuehrer. In 1943, Goebbels asked Kittel to write for his Anti-Judische Aktion (Anti-Jewish Action), a publication laced with Goebbels' astrological predictions about a German victory in the war. Kittel admitted knowing "about Jewish murders" and wrote of his support for Adolf Hitler's actions:

[T]oday many harsh things do occur and must occur...It was not despotic brutality or barbarism...[for] the Fuhrer...in his radical resolve...to place the Jewish problem on a wholly new foundation...[T]he radical suppression...carried out by National Socialism is not, as almost the entire world maintains, an unheard of cruelty against the Jews.14

To what was Kittel referring when he said, "radical suppression...unheard of cruelty"? - Mass Murder. As late as 1944, Kittel was lecturing at the University of Vienna, speaking of the "depraved Jews who were the cause of the fall of the Roman Empire."15 His writing showed attempts to rationalize the murder of Jews by twisting Talmudic thoughts. Kittel writes:

...full freedom to murder...just as you should smash the brains of even the best snake...[This is] justification for the most anti-Jewish acts.16

The pen of the Psalmist painted a perfect portrait of Kittel. Jerusalem is our mother (Galatians 4:26) and the Jews, the sons of Jerusalem. Ericksen concludes:

The picture of Kittel which emerges is not that of a devout Christian...He refurbished it with a touch of contemporary racial mysticism.17

...continued...
 
Last edited:

doctrox

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2018
1,119
824
113
worldwide
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
First - we question God's word. Its authority is moved out of the way. Then, our "impressions," "feelings," "reasonings" or "associates" become our authority. We have now moved to step two and become our own gods. Then the EVIL comes. It is a shorter route than one might imagine. Ericksen points out:

[W]e cannot rely upon intelligence or rationalism to protect us from error. We must further acknowledge that neither rationalism, intellectualism or Christian [?] values protected Kittel...from supporting Hitler [and mass murder]. This is a disturbing conclusion and one which requires careful consideration if we desire that the Hitler phenomena not recur.18

But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. II Timothy 3:13

If you feel that perhaps you have been deceived, you are not alone. At the very end of Kittel's life, he confessed that the years of his editorship of the Dictionary and his propaganda 'ministry' for Hitler,

...was based upon the most bitter deception of my life.19

His lack of spiritual discernment or his "diseased conscience," as Ericksen calls it, seems to have been accompanied by a defect in his scholarship. In citing an error in Kittel's work, Ericksen writes,

This example throws a shadow of doubt on all of Kittel's research...Kittel's factual base may not always have been strong enough to support the conclusions he drew.20

What are these conclusions? Perhaps you will hear some this week from the pulpit, the radio or television preachers, or as you read a 'New' version.

The next time you hear a pastor proclaim, "The Greek here really means...," (yea hath God said?), be forewarned that his pronouncements are an echo from history past. Their hollow sound is one of Kittel's spiritually bankrupt grammatico-historico methods of exegesis used by today's lexicons. Carson reveals:

I have heard pastors with two or three years of Greek behind them explain to their congregation what a certain Greek word means by citing all the entries in some lexicon.21

Hiding behind a curtain of words, today's Wizard of Ahs bluff, because as Kohlenberger reveals, they are taught only "basic grammar" and even:

[T]hose who have concentrated on biblical languages have not taken as many courses or translated as much literature as would be required for a bachelor's degree in liberal arts.22

The Greek and Hebrew Lexicons and dictionaries are written by men, "most of whom are unbelievers," writes Princeton and Yale scholar Edward Hills. A few examples will suffice: 1) The New Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew-English Lexicon's editor (Briggs) was defrocked by the 'liberal' Presbyterian Church for his 'liberalism'. 2) Trench, author of the much used Synonyms of the New Testament, was a member of Westcott's esoteric clubs, as was Alford, whose Greek reference works are still used. 3) J. Henry Thayer, author of the New Thayer's Greek Lexicon, was a Unitarian who vehemently denied the deity of Christ. (Thayer was also the dominant member of the ASV committee!) His Lexicon contains a seldom noticed warning by the publisher in its Introduction (p. vii). It cautions readers to watch for adulterations in the work relating to the deity of Christ and the Trinity. 4) The acclaimed A.T. Robertson's Greek Grammar also sends up a red flag in its preface saying, "The text of Westcott and Hort is followed in all its essentials." 5) Conclusions drawn by Kurt and Barbara Aland of the Nestles-Aland Greek New Testament elicit the response by Phillip Comfort that "the Alands' designations must be taken with caution."23 6) James Strong, author of Strong's Concordance was a member of the corrupt ASV Committee. Hills summarizes:

Undeniably these unbelievers know a great many facts by virtue of God's common grace. They misrepresent these facts, however because they ignore and deny God's revelation of himself in and through the facts.

Just as Black's Law Dictionary switched definitions to match progressively liberal legal interpretations, likewise most Greek and Hebrew dictionaries and interlinears have now adopted definitions based on Kittel's expanded dictionary, or the like, which define words based on citations by ancient Greeks like Plato, Socrates, Aristotle and other pagan sources. When applied to bible words, these pagan interpretations serve, not as a magnifying glass, as most suppose, but as a glass darkened by the shadow of fallen men. One example will suffice. The word 'love', if defined from the pulpits of our day, would elicit a definition embracing such connotation as 'a feeling', 'an emotion' or perhaps a sexual sentiment. We have all heard bible teachers, following a Kittel-like Lexicon cite phileo and agapao, as the two Greek words which are translated 'love' in the New Testament. Phileo, according to their grammatico-historico method of exegesis, would mean 'to be a friend'; agapao would mean 'an unselfish Godlike love'. These definitions, garnered from the secular Greek writers of the time, do not represent God's use of the terms.

"Every word of God is pure" and "given by inspiration of God"; reference works are not. The bible calls us to "compare spiritual things with spiritual" things (I Cor. 2:13). Studying the context of other verses which also contain the word (listed in a concordance) will reveal God's definition of the word. ('Love', for example, is defined in I John as "keep his commandments." We are to 'act' in love, not to 'feel' love. Going along with the New Age, new versions render Mark 10:21, "felt a love for" rather than "Jesus loved him.") New versions hid this key to understanding bible words by mistranslating I Cor. 2:13. They say, "combining (or expressing) spiritual thoughts with spiritual words." The NASB italicizes 'words' and 'thoughts' because they do not occur in the Greek. The command in all Greek MS is "comparing," not 'combining' or 'expressing'.

Aleph, and B as well, have numerous instances of anti-Semitism. New versions, based on Aleph and B in I Thessalonians 2:15, say the Jews killed "the prophets" rather than just "their own prophets," as cited in the KJV and Majority text. New versions echo Kittel's 1943 speech which purported there was a Talmudic Jewish mandate to kill Gentiles in general. Supporting Kittel's claim of a murderous spirit among Jews, new versions change Acts 26:17 from "Delivering thee from the people" to "from the Jewish people." No Greek support exists for adding the word 'Jewish'. Again, in Acts 23:12, the NIV and NASB have all of "the Jews" conspiring "under a curse" to kill Paul, whereas the verse really says "certain of the Jews." In addition, Mark 12:33, in the New Jerusalem Bible, directly transliterates the word 'holocaust' in a positive context, in spite of its contemporary negative associations.

Did Jesus forgive the Jews? Not according to the new versions. The NASV, NAB and Living Bible add "the guilt of" to Matthew 23:35, words which appear in no Greek manuscript. In addition, the verse, "Father forgive them; for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34) is "probably not in the original writings," according to the New American Bible, the NASB Interlinear Greek-English New Testament, Nestle's Greek and the Jehovah Witness New World Translation.24 The NIV casts doubt on its inclusion with a marginal note. The verse is found in the vast majority of manuscripts, even the early uncials such as Aleph, A, C, L, N, as well as the Old Latin, Curetonian, Peshitta, Harclean, and Philoxenia versions. Scholars believe its omission was caused by Marcion, who was anti-Jewish in all his sentiments. (Williams, Alterations to the Text, p. 9) "Marcion expunged his copies of the Gospel according to Luke of all references to the Jewish background of Jesus," notes another scholar.25 "Paul's favorable remarks about Israel posed a problem for Marcion who simply excised those passages," says still another.26 New version editors who question its inclusion are in the beleaguered company of Marcion, the Vatican Manuscript, Westcott and Hort.

Of the 1935 Nuremberg Blood Laws enacted in Nazi Germany to halt the intermarriage of Gentiles and Jews, Carr tells us:

In Nazi racial doctrine blood was intimately related to the concept of race, race defilement.....To the Nazi, the prime capital crime of the Jewish people was race defilement, which meant intermingling blood lines.27

Kittel's propaganda reinforced this belief, as seen in his writings:

[T]heir...blood results in decadence...It weakens and infects...It is poison...[T]here was a moral right to throw stink bombs.28

This idea was rooted in Blavatsky's writings which asserted that the Jewish people were created by "Jehovah, an inferior god" and therefore are not of "the same essence" as the Aryan race.29 Acts 17:26 disagrees saying, God "hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth." Now new versions join Blavatsky, Aleph and B, omitting the word "blood." The omission leaves an awkward sentence so some versions substitute the word 'man', although it does not occur in any Greek manuscripts, even Aleph and B.

...continued...
 
Last edited:

doctrox

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2018
1,119
824
113
worldwide
Faith
Christian
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
...then you must show why the super majority of the biblebelieivng body of Christ is wrong and you are so right.
The "super majority" has always been wrong. It's scripture:

Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. (Mat. 7:13-15)

And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God. (Luke 16:15)

Well you keep saying the greek and hebrew are not necessary. You said Gods Word is preserved. What language is it preserved and how did every language get a bible...Is gods Word preserved in Greek, Hebrew, Latin, Spanish, French, Russian, chinese and the hundreds of other languages or they allo false translations?
The issue is not about the KJV per se. The issue is about the text type from which the KJB is sourced. The KJB text type is representative of 99.9% of all extant evidence (manuscripts, autographs) -- over 5400 items. Conversely, the modern copyrighted versions are representative of less than 0.1% of the evidence -- a handful of evidence that historically has been rejected as corrupt. ALL Bibles (not solely today’s English KJB) that were in the line of ascension to the KJB were likewise sourced from that same 99.9% Majority Text.

God has no use for any “originals,” otherwise he would have made certain that we had them today. It’s NEVER been about the translators. Believing it is, is why you have a problem, a disjunction between inspiration and preservation. It’s an irony when some mockingly chatter, ‘Are you saying the KJV translators were inspired like Moses?’ -- when the printed Greek edition that they naively think is ‘the originals’ was edited by men who were no more inspired than the KJV translators. Rather, God’s word is inspired.

What would Jesus do? (please choose one):

a) Inspire a Bible people can read?
b ) Inspire conflicting Greek editions which few can read?
c) Inspire unsaved liberals to write conflicting Greek lex-icons to translate conflicting one-man Greek editions?
d) Inspire originals, then lose them?

A little leaven leavens the whole lump. Touch not the unclean thing; pass not by it. AVOID IT like the plague it is. I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes. God's pattern has always been the same. He has always given the COMMON MAN the COMMON BIBLE written in the COMMON LANGUAGE of the day to do one thing: evangelize the world. Today, that vernacular Bible is the uncopyrighted, free discourse King James Bible.

...hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?...For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: but we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness; but unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. (1 Cor. 1:20, 22-24)

The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in the LORD shall be safe. (Pro. 29:25)

Footnotes:

1 The NIV: The Making of a Contemporary Translation, pp. 166, 110. Lewis Foster, Selecting a Translation of the Bible (Cincinnati, Ohio: Standard Publishing Co.), p. 17.
2 Robert Ericksen, Theologians under Hitler (Hew Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), p. 54.
3 Ibid., p. 37.
4 William Foxwell Albright, History, Archeology and Christian Humanism (New York, 1964), pp. 229-230.
5 Theologians Under Hitler, p. 25, 41, 48, 59.
6 Ibid., pp. 25, 70.
7 Ibid., p. 70.
8 Ibid., pp. 54, 61, 74, 75.
9 Gerhard Kittel, Die Judenfrage (Stuttgart, 1933), p. 39.
10 'Deutsche Wissenschaft and Judenfrage - "Forschungsabteilung Judenfrage" des Reichsinstituts Geschichte des neuen Deutschlands eroffnet,' Volkischer Beobachter, 325. Ausgabe, 49. Jahrgang (20 Nov. 1936), Munich edition, p. 1.
11 Theologians Under Hitler, pp. 34-37, 45, 49.
12 Gerhard Kittel, 'Die Behandlung des Nichtjuden nach dem Talmud', Archiv fur Judenfragen, vol. 1, Group A, (Berlin, 1943), p. 7.
13 Joseph J. Carr, The Twisted Cross, p. 190, 149.
14 Gerhard Kittel, 'Die Entstehung des Judentums und die Entstehung der Judenfrage', Forschungen zur Judenfrage, vol. 1 (Hamburg, 1936), p. 63; Gerhard Kittel, 'Das Konnubium mit den Nicht-Juden im Antiken Judentum', Forschungen zur Judenfrage, vol. 2 (Hamburg, 1937), p. 62.
15 Gerhard Kittel, 'Die Entstehung des Judentums' (Theological Library of the University of Tubingen, lecture delivered March 22, 1943), p. 5.
16 Gerhard Kittel, 'Die Behandlung des Nichtjuden nach dem Talmud", Archiv fur Judenfragen, vol. 1, Group A1 (Berlin, 1943), p. 7.
17 Theologians Under Hitler, p. 76.
18 Ibid., pp. 26, 27.
19 Gerhard Kittel, Meine Veneidigung (Tubingen Library Archives, November-December, 1946), p. 67.
20 Theologians Under Hitler, p. 62.
21 The King James Debate, p. 89.
22 Words About the Word, p. 62.
23 Early Manuscripts and Modem Translations of the New Testament, p. 7.
24 The NASB Interlinear Greek-English New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Publishing House, 1984), p. wiii.
25 Wilbur Pickering, The Identity of the New Testament Text (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1980), p. 41.
26 New Directions in New Testament Study, p. 42, see also New Dimensions in New Testament Study, p. 154.
27 The Twisted Cross, p. 44.
28 Gerhard Kittel, Die Judenfrage (Stuttgart, 1933), p. 34.
29 The Secret Doctrine, Vol. II, pp. 439-445.

- R. G.
 
Last edited: