Hiddenthings
Well-Known Member
Well, you do not believe in the common understanding of hell.Although, I can't say anything has been "proven" false.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Well, you do not believe in the common understanding of hell.Although, I can't say anything has been "proven" false.
Did the Apostles expect truth?Everyone is in error on some point.
So why the warnings against apostacy if there are no consequences?I don't think God cares about that. (within reason)
So are you saying entrance is only on the basis of feeling unworthy?God will work through whom He chooses. (typically those who feel unworthy)
Whether that makes them part of the kingdom or not, I can't say.
In a sense, anyone who acts under the authority of the kingdom is a part. ???
Whether officially or not.
The disciples questioned Jesus about another group casting out demons in His name.
Do you recall His response?
The Apostles were flying by the seat of their tunics. Expect truth?Did the Apostles expect truth?
So why the warnings against apostacy if there are no consequences?
So are you saying entrance is only on the basis of feeling unworthy?
Jesus told the multitudes that they needed to eat His flesh and drink His blood.Yes, “Blessed are the eyes that see what you see. 24 For I tell you that many prophets and kings wanted to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it.” Luke 10
Again, it feeds into an intelligible hope does it not?
oh I know of it . I also know its wrong. hell and all its conditions comes from the thinking of men . in reality its nothing more than the grave . the big fear of it comes long before anyone dies. which brings us back to lies told to scare people into being nicer to each other .Well, you do not believe in the common understanding of hell.
Not inspired then? Not in tune with Christ?The Apostles were flying by the seat of their tunics. Expect truth?
A falling away from truth seems to be no small matter.Apostasy is dangerous, but what is it exactly?
God chooses those who feel unworthy, like Moses.
What does eating his flesh and drinking his blood mean?Jesus told the multitudes that they needed to eat His flesh and drink His blood.
Was that intelligible?
[
You are richly blessed to know this truth...many do not!oh I know of it . I also know its wrong. hell and all its conditions comes from the thinking of men . in reality its nothing more than the grave . the big fear of it comes long before anyone dies. which brings us back to lies told to scare people into being nicer to each other .
Jesus said he was the living bread, and again, he called himself the true bread.Jesus told the multitudes that they needed to eat His flesh and drink His blood.
Was that intelligible?
With every post you springboard off in another direction.Jesus said he was the living bread, and again, he called himself the true bread.
So the question is: do you recognise the difference between true and false bread? Or are both indistinguishable to you?
Jesus is not referring to eating flesh or drinking blood literally. He is showing that all who want everlasting life must exercise faith in the sacrifice that he is to make when he offers up his perfect human body and pours out his lifeblood.The Apostles were flying by the seat of their tunics. Expect truth?
Apostasy is dangerous, but what is it exactly?
God chooses those who feel unworthy, like Moses.
Jesus told the multitudes that they needed to eat His flesh and drink His blood.
Was that intelligible?
[
I understand that. My point was that those listening to Him in that moment did not. Even the disciples.Jesus is not referring to eating flesh or drinking blood literally. He is showing that all who want everlasting life must exercise faith in the sacrifice that he is to make when he offers up his perfect human body and pours out his lifeblood.
Consider it metaphorical.
If, by questioning whether Christ is intelligible, specifically his words about his flesh and blood, you’re implying that he is not, then I’m simply presenting a contrast and testing your questions to see if they hold up to the truth.With every post you springboard off in another direction.
Are you reading my posts?
If you think I am offering false bread, you should run away.
[
We agree again! 2 from 2...the doctrine of transubstantiation is a perversion of what Christ taught.Jesus is not referring to eating flesh or drinking blood literally. He is showing that all who want everlasting life must exercise faith in the sacrifice that he is to make when he offers up his perfect human body and pours out his lifeblood.
Consider it metaphorical.
How many hours have you sat in pews whilst all manner of things were orated, and wondered what it meant?I understand that. My point was that those listening to Him in that moment did not. Even the disciples.
THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY for any jew or gentile to be grafted inthey will be grafted back in .
This sheep dont follow harlots or A HARLOT .We agree again! 2 from 2...the doctrine of transubstantiation is a perversion of what Christ taught.
We know the truth now. It only gets better.We'll know, as we are fully known.
The truth isn't a poison, it's the cure.
We'll know the truth, and the truth will set us free.
[
In 1 Cor. 11:27, Paul speaks to the reality of the Eucharist and the severity of the consequences to those who take this lightly:We agree again! 2 from 2...the doctrine of transubstantiation is a perversion of what Christ taught.
Jesus uses metaphorical language all through his discourse regarding the eating of his flesh and the drinking of his blood, which, if taken literally, would have broken God’s law.….that is what shocked his Jewish audience. Was he suggesting to them that they were to break God’s law and literally do that?In 1 Cor. 11:27, Paul speaks to the reality of the Eucharist and the severity of the consequences to those who take this lightly:
1 Cor. 11:27-30
“Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord. A person should examine himself, and so eat the bread and drink the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many among you are ill and infirm, and a considerable number are dying.”
This is pretty harsh language for something that Protestants claim is only a symbol. This directly correlates to the Bread of Life Discourse in John 6, where Jesus stated in no uncertain terms:
John 6
“Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.
Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For MY FLESH IS TRUE FOOD, and MY BLOOD IS TRUE DRINK. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him.”
The usual Greek word used for human eating is “phagon”. However, this is NOT the word used in these passages. John uses the word, “trogon”, which means, “to munch or to gnaw” - like an animal eats. Jesus was again using hyperbole, as he often did to make His point so that the crowd would understand that he was NOT speaking metaphorically. He meant what he said.
Just as the Paschal Lamb was to be eaten, it is also true for the Lamb of God.
In verse 60, his disciples said,
John 6:60
"This saying is hard; who can accept it?"
Did Jesus explain what he "really" meant? NO, He said:
John 6:61
"Does this shock you?"
Again, the Lord’s Supper is not to be taken lightly….it is not to be partaken of by those who are not anointed with the holy spirit, as if it was some sort of lucky charm (as Catholic infant baptism seems to be) nor is it to be transformed into something repulsive to Jews and Christians alike. Taken literally, it is “shocking” and so that is how we know that Jesus never meant it that way….his apostles always waited for an explanation if they didn’t understand his words. Which is why Jesus asked them if they were going to leave too?He knew that some would not believe because they didn't have true faith from the Father.
At the Last Supper – Jesus said:
“This IS my Body” and “This IS my Blood” (Matt. 26:26-30, Luke 22:19-20, Mark 14:22-25, 1 Cor. 11:23-25)
He didn’t say, “This represents my Body” - or, “This symbolizes my Blood.”
He showed them how to consume the Lamb of God sacramentally.
Read Jane's post, no point me duplicating what truth has already been said.In 1 Cor. 11:27, Paul speaks to the reality of the Eucharist and the severity of the consequences to those who take this lightly:
1 Cor. 11:27-30
“Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord. A person should examine himself, and so eat the bread and drink the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many among you are ill and infirm, and a considerable number are dying.”
This is pretty harsh language for something that Protestants claim is only a symbol. This directly correlates to the Bread of Life Discourse in John 6, where Jesus stated in no uncertain terms:
John 6
“Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.
Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For MY FLESH IS TRUE FOOD, and MY BLOOD IS TRUE DRINK. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him.”
The usual Greek word used for human eating is “phagon”. However, this is NOT the word used in these passages. John uses the word, “trogon”, which means, “to munch or to gnaw” - like an animal eats. Jesus was again using hyperbole, as he often did to make His point so that the crowd would understand that he was NOT speaking metaphorically. He meant what he said.
Just as the Paschal Lamb was to be eaten, it is also true for the Lamb of God.
In verse 60, his disciples said,
John 6:60
"This saying is hard; who can accept it?"
Did Jesus explain what he "really" meant? NO, He said:
John 6:61
"Does this shock you?"
He knew that some would not believe because they didn't have true faith from the Father.
At the Last Supper – Jesus said:
“This IS my Body” and “This IS my Blood” (Matt. 26:26-30, Luke 22:19-20, Mark 14:22-25, 1 Cor. 11:23-25)
He didn’t say, “This represents my Body” - or, “This symbolizes my Blood.”
He showed them how to consume the Lamb of God sacramentally.