Ernest T. Bass
Well-Known Member
Now: How come the totality of what you claim, IS NOT CORRECT OR TRUE?
First, Your argument of: <<a 'not-but elliptical' statement where emphasis is put upon one thing (preaching) over another (baptizing) but not to the total exclusion of baptizing>> is a manufactured attempt at escaping or rather defying the unity, oneness and completeness of the baptism which is <<of Christ>>, the baptism exactly wherein and wherewith <<emphasis is put upon one thing>>— upon the ONENESS of the <preaching> AND the <baptizing> to the total exclusion of duality or plurality, name it what you like, of ‘baptism’ and / plus / add ‘water’.
Rather, in fact, the <statement> which you aver is <<a 'not-but elliptical' statement>>, is NO <<‘elliptical' statement>>. It is a FULL statement of un-mediated momentary ‘baptism’ made by God the Holy Spirit the Baptist and undergone by a simultaneously discipled believer the baptised, OF: being “baptized-in-The-NAME” by an APOSTLE sent by CHRIST, whose baptism, as John the Baptist made sure, “IS NOT WITH WATER”.
An elliptical statement is not manufactured as you claim (again more claims that you do not substantiate). I gave other examples of elliptical not-but statements. Your whole post above is full of claims and nothing at all to back those claims up.