Jahbulon - the 3 person divinity of Freemasonry
The 3 person or gods are JHVH (using the Tetragrammaton in this study of a pseudochristian idol) for Jah, Baal for Bul, and Osiris for On - JahBulOn.
Are they in the bible? - yes sirree bob. Jah and bul need no elaboration. But On may need a little explanation. Osiris is the Egyptian fertility god that hovered back and forth from the under world and Tammuz of babylon fame seems to fit the explanation for the palestinian area. So there you have it, the economic triadic of Jahbulon right there in the bible.
While the Jahbulon the name is not in the Bible, there are verses where you find the hint of some plurality in the Godhead
"Then God said, ‘Let us make human beings in our image, after our likeness, to have dominion over the fish in the sea, the birds of the air, the cattle, all wild animals on land, and everything that creeps on the earth.’" (Gen 1:26)
"But he said, ‘The man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil; what if he now reaches out and takes fruit from the tree of life also, and eats it and lives for ever?’" (Gen 3:22)
I paraphrase some source
"Neither the word Jahbulon nor the explicit doctrine of 3 gods in one appears in the bible, as it may contradict the Shema in the Hebrew Scriptures: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deuteronomy 6:4). "
I hijack BB Warfield "A doctrine so defined can be spoken of as a Biblical doctrine only on the principle that the sense of Scripture is Scripture." In other words, if it sort of looks like scripture and has cultural and political ramifications, why not.
Belief in the Jahbulon, therefore, is a matter of our accepting divine revelation
Still there is a distinction that God the Father is unique in His position as the Supreme God....God Almighty.
By saying something is not "biblical" is not necessarily to say it is "unbiblical." In that sense one may say the "Jahbulon formula" is not biblical.
But the principle of the Jahbulon as 3 distinct divine Persons is, in fact, in the Bible. Therefore Jahbulon doctrine can in another sense be said to be fully "biblical." :-)
What do you think or feel or blether?
The 3 person or gods are JHVH (using the Tetragrammaton in this study of a pseudochristian idol) for Jah, Baal for Bul, and Osiris for On - JahBulOn.
Are they in the bible? - yes sirree bob. Jah and bul need no elaboration. But On may need a little explanation. Osiris is the Egyptian fertility god that hovered back and forth from the under world and Tammuz of babylon fame seems to fit the explanation for the palestinian area. So there you have it, the economic triadic of Jahbulon right there in the bible.
While the Jahbulon the name is not in the Bible, there are verses where you find the hint of some plurality in the Godhead
"Then God said, ‘Let us make human beings in our image, after our likeness, to have dominion over the fish in the sea, the birds of the air, the cattle, all wild animals on land, and everything that creeps on the earth.’" (Gen 1:26)
"But he said, ‘The man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil; what if he now reaches out and takes fruit from the tree of life also, and eats it and lives for ever?’" (Gen 3:22)
I paraphrase some source
"Neither the word Jahbulon nor the explicit doctrine of 3 gods in one appears in the bible, as it may contradict the Shema in the Hebrew Scriptures: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deuteronomy 6:4). "
I hijack BB Warfield "A doctrine so defined can be spoken of as a Biblical doctrine only on the principle that the sense of Scripture is Scripture." In other words, if it sort of looks like scripture and has cultural and political ramifications, why not.
Belief in the Jahbulon, therefore, is a matter of our accepting divine revelation
Still there is a distinction that God the Father is unique in His position as the Supreme God....God Almighty.
By saying something is not "biblical" is not necessarily to say it is "unbiblical." In that sense one may say the "Jahbulon formula" is not biblical.
But the principle of the Jahbulon as 3 distinct divine Persons is, in fact, in the Bible. Therefore Jahbulon doctrine can in another sense be said to be fully "biblical." :-)
What do you think or feel or blether?