I have given many sources, you schrug them off cause they cast light on your darkness! You went off on Wikipedia, yet you avoided and evaded the av1611.org site? Why is that?
You posted the fake encyclopedia site
Wikipedia -- I didn’t! Rather, where’s your
documentation?
What
documentation, purportedly found on “the av1611.org site,” do you have to offer that proves your claim that the KJB is a revision? Answer: There isn’t any.
You can not name one modern bible that solely uses "Wescott-Hort... Some may reference but not use them.
lol @ “some may reference them.” Rather,
here is that post again, with a dozen or so
documentations (just in case you missed it the first time).
..."Wescott-Hort" in your attempt to cast doubt on their validity.
Westcott and Hort called
themselves heretics ROFL.
Read the
documentation from their biographies
here.
Do you even know what they exactly did besides quoting some off the wall KJV Only site?
I do. I'll give you a tiny teaser.
You’ve already been shown the origin of your NIV and all such modern copyrighted versions. Two
spiritualists,
Westcott and
Hort, changed the traditional Greek text in well over eight thousand places using the Vaticanus manuscript and other corrupt texts. In 1881, this 1% minority text type supplanted the Majority Text with its almost two millennia standing. All modern versions, including your NIV, are their product.
It’s true that a few pop occult books do not list Westcott and Hort in the lineage of the current channeling movement.
But if one wants to ignore all of the primary sources posted here and also found elsewhere, such as in their own biographies, and follow some hearsay sources (as you seem wont to do), TONS of those CAN be found to prove the new version editors, Westcott and Hort, were considered ‘mystics’ by their contemporaries and are classified as such by
other scholars who
used primary sources.
In addition to
numerous references given in
New Age Bible Versions, B. F. Westcott is identified as a “mystic” by the standard reference work of his day:
The Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). Princeton University Press’ recent book,
The Christian Socialist Revival (1968, Peter d’A Jones) says B. F. Westcott was “a mystic” (p. 179). The highly respected
Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics identifies both B. F. Wescott and F. J. A. Hort as Alexandrian mystics (see ‘Alexandrian Theology’ et al.).
The Occult Illustrated Dictionary even cites our bible correctors B. F. Westcott, Hort, and Lightfoot and their ‘ghostly’ games.
And the claim by some, that B. F. Westcott’s ‘Ghostly Guild’ activities and Spiritualism were only a part of his younger days, is proven wrong through numerous quotes in
New Age Bible Versions. He speaks, as late as 1880 (age 55), about “fellowship with the spiritual world” and “the dominion which the dead have over us” (p. 439).
Even Westcott’s son said his father had “faith” “in Spiritualism.” Webster defines ‘
spiritualism’ as “the practices of spiritualists;” and “the belief that departed spirits hold intercourse with mortals by means of physical phenomena, as by rapping, or during abnormal mental states, as in trances, commonly manifested through a medium.” Webster defines necromancy as, “communication with the spirits of the dead.”
Also, any pretense that Wescott and Hort’s Ghostly Guild was ‘scientific’ rather than ‘spiritualistic’ is dissolved by the
many references cited in the book. If it was scientific, it would not have aroused the “derision and even some alarm” by Cambridge colleagues who were “appalled” and referred to it as “mediaeval darkness.”
The Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology lists the Ghostly Guild Club as one in which “members related
personal experiences concerning ghosts.”
.
.