Hi Kaoticprofit,
First I need to say that I started this thread to learn more than I know, and I have barely begun the reading I set myself. That aside, I will indicate some of what I know in this reply.
What makes you think that any country, let alone the entire world, would relinquish it's political authority to a dictator? And with what military would he do this with?
The UN has been working on the answer to this question since the last world war. If you are willing to dig into the topic more, you will find the website called 'stopthenorthamericanunion.com' full of detail. The changes which been made to the US Constitution in the last ten years might interest you.
Regarding military might, here is another area where the UN has commandeered international forces for its own ends. These are always made to sound as if they are in the national interest of the country donating the forces, but that may be a smokescreen for another agenda.
Again on the matter of military might, you may have noticed that the people are powerless to
obtain a government which represents
them effectively. In the UK (where I am) politicians have behaved so badly that no-one trusts them, wants to vote for them, or even wants to bother taking 'politics' seriously as a way of obtaining representation. Apathy has enabled successive governments to wreck various parts of the national infrastructure to such an extent - education included - see veteran's thread in the General forum about the merging of US and Soviet education systems - that a large minority of people have no idea what is going on. On both sides of the Atlantic governments are promoting drug use, with the resulting mental health issues which leave people unable to stand up for themselves, let alone fight for the common right. I'm stating this as an observation rather than a criticism, as I'm aware that we are to pray for the wisdom of our civil leaders so that we may lead quiet and peaceable lives.
In the EU, the Lisbon Treaty which was the revised European Constitution that countries were for the most part
not given a referendum (even when it had been promised, as in the UK) to decide, there are many undesirable effects for member nations. Although the UK is not a full member like Ireland is, because of all our trade agreements, our freedom is not as free as it could be. I have not read this Treaty, but, I was fascinated by hearing that the Foreign Ministry of the Union is in Rome, and every Foreign Minister had to go to Rome (not Lisbon) to sign an 'instrument' there.
This sent me searching the internet for documentation. What I found, is a well-advanced plan for a judiciary and legal system which would have a physical base in each country. So far so good. But, it would not pay for this base, or be taxed for it. The base will not be open to scrutiny by the State in which it was situated. Those working in the base are not answerable to anyone, anywhere, not even a Eurpean authority. Documentation which is taken into the base would not necessarily ever come out again. Those inside the base would decide everything independently. From what I could tell, if a person went to Court there, there were absolutely no safeguards, no not one, over how they were to be represented, treated or disposed of.
And where are the scriptures to support it? And where are the scriptures that support a one world religion and one world government?
The second of these questions is the theme of this thread - the very extensive study linked in the opening post.
For a different take on the 'one world' everything agenda, and scripture to show it both in the Bible and something from which God intends to deliver believers, I suggest Mike Hoggard on youtube - almost any of his presentations will deal with an aspect of this. His ministry is completely different from the writer of Mark of the Beast or Mark of Yah, but they are saying the same thing. It's both in the Bible, and, it will fail, ultimately.
