ALL moral values are SUBJECTIVE because a moral code is self-centered, that is, decided upon by the individual. What most of you are debating is not morality but ethics. Ethics is over-arching social system to which our personal moral conduct is measured.
First, let's toss all the snowjobbers and scripture monkeys overboard who automatically post "God this" and "God that" in whatever thread they participate, even if it is a thread about cooking chili. Until we nail down a
basic and common understanding of the difference and similarities between morals and ethics all the God posting we could ever want to do is meaningless.
Now that they are properly annoyed let's continue:
wisegeek said:
When considering the difference between ethics and morals, it may be helpful to consider a criminal defense lawyer. Though the lawyer's personal moral code likely finds murder immoral and reprehensible, ethics demand the accused client be defended as vigorously as possible, even when the lawyer knows the party is guilty, even at the expense of setting him free possibly to murder again. Legal ethics must override personal morals for the greater good of upholding a justice system in which the accused are given a fair trial and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."
The question as to whether we attach our moral compas to a God centered ethic or a non-God centered ethic is a valid question, but goes beyond the scope of the OP. The ethical standard which an individual adhears is ultimately the hammer that shatters the OP argument because all those premises assume an unwritten premise, specifically, "All moral values are derived from God."
We know that assumption to be false from common experience. The better question to be asked is, "Are the moral values derived from a God Centered Ethic superior to all other ethical standards?"
When we answer that question we have a better understanding of ourselves and the Lord whom we worship.