It just goes to show how you have been blinded by your own false beliefs. You have absolutely no clue about this matter.
I have a lot more clue than you.
You seem unable or just unwilling, to answer the points I make.
Here are points I made in post #13 that you have ignored:
1. The punishment for sin is eternal separation from God – but Jesus is not eternally separated from God.
2. God would be legally punishing an innocent person for the sins of another.
3. If the legal debt has been paid then no-one can be condemned for sin since then God would be taking double payment for the same debt.
4. There is no need for God’s mercy since the debt has been paid. Mercy implies reduction or “letting off” of some or all the debt of punishment.
Moreover the whole theory introduced conflict into the Godhead The whole idea is grotesque.
Also you still cannot explain how penal atonement and forgiveness can co-exist since they are the antithesis of each other.
(Post #25)In the parable of the unforgiving servant
That is why the kingdom of heaven may be likened to a king who decided to settle accounts with his servants. When he began the accounting, a debtor was brought before him who owed him a huge amount. Since he had no way of paying it back, his master ordered him to be sold, along with his wife, his children, and all his property, in payment of the debt. At that, the servant fell down, did him homage, and said, ‘Be patient with me, and I will pay you back in full. Moved with compassion the master of that servant let him go and forgave him the loan. (Mt 18:23-27)
Who paid the servants debt?
Answer -
no-one. The king forgave the debt.
If someone had paid it the servant would not still have owed it.
Penal substitution means the debt is
paid not
forgiven.
If a debt is
forgiven then it is
not paid. That is what forgiveness means.