Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
He was a very evil dude in fact before he became the Pope.
One could go on and on. but old mate is not a worthy Christian as top people in the RCC have pointed out.
Here's just one example of this evil pope doing evil:
projects.iq.harvard.edu
This is such a completely idiotic and utterly ignorant post - it's difficult to know just where to begin. You have obviously been spoon-fed this anti-Catholic manure for some time . . .What makes Pope Francis evil, is what makes all popes evil. The R.C.C. ( Roman Catholic Church, ) evil, is it has always been a false and evil demonic cult, marrying the church to the false world system, and producing a false works based salvation hybrid, of all kinds of false and clearly highly demonic beliefs and doctrines, etc..,
Galatians 2:7-8 "But on the contrary, seeing that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised (for He who effectually worked for Peter in his apostleship to the circumcised effectually worked for me also to the Gentiles)" NASB.
It doesn't matter which is one's prefered bible translation, because they all basically reveal the same truth. Peter had written of Paul being scripture, to be trusted, and likewise here of Paul too writing in the Spirit, this scripture, that the latter missions of Peter and Paul, being Peter to the circumcised and Paul to the uncircumcised, or gentiles.
And so that scripture alone, negates all of the false claims of the bogus authority of the lying and highly demonic R.C.C,
Peter in fact in the beginning was likewise a general witness for God, and the gospel, and wrote epistles beneficial to all. But as to their final calling, God had assigned Peter to evangelize to the Jews and Paul to the Gentiles - So Peter could not have been Pope of that False Universal R.C.C. Cult.
View attachment 31947
Which is the scriptural basis for rejecting the entire line of false R.C.C, lies.
Everything in the NT, and even the OT, can refute all of the blatant and blasphemous lies of the R.C.C.
Take for example the Lord's Prayer. It is not a stock prayer, for vain mere repetition, to be counted off against a rosary, or not, based on how many times a false R.C.C. priest may tell you to repeat it, to complete some vain count, to absolve one of their current list of sins. - It is rather a model for prayer, to recognize all of the truths behind it, for the disciples themselves. In other words it is a model of and for the disciples when they pray. If however, it were likewise meant for everyone else, just counting it off, so many times in a row, would be a direct violation of the new testament, and Jesus's admonition against "vain repetitions," as prayer is to be heartfelt petition, rather than mere hollow repetition.
Likewise prayers to Mary, the Hail Mary prayers, are likewise equally blasphemous and clearly the false worship of the Great Harlot, in Mary's name, as nowhere in scripture are we to pray to Mary rather than to God. And likewise, merely counting these false prayerts off against a rosary, would be mere vain repetitions likewise, even if not praying to the devil in the name of Mary.
The Immaculate Conception, and Assumption, of Mary, and making her Co-Redemptrix, are likewise all false and demonic doctrines, as everything about the R.C.C. is false and demonic.
And then there are the false R.C.C. prophecies of the Roman Catholic they called St. Malachy, a rough contemporary of another false prophet of that time, Nostradamus. All who are saved, are the saints. But to the R.C.C. only those who they falsely attribute false miracles to when they are dead, are called Saints by the R.C.C. Prayers to the dead, and assigning false miracles to them likewise, is Necromancy, again, a highly demonic and false and absolutely forbidden practice in the bible.
But this false St. Malachy came up with a false list of 111 Papal Succession prophecies, with a 112th final unnamed Pope, to be known as Peter The Roman. And of course as a false list, claimed by the false and highly pagan R.C.C., naturally the list was highly accurate in naming all the false popes counted as to have come before, and not as accurate to those in, and after, St. Malachy's day. And in fact the popes to follow, often forced themselves to have the Details needed, to fit the subsequent names given to them.
And as Ezekiel 26: - 28: shows us, in Eze 28:3 thru all of it's revelation, that the devil was more clever than Daniel, knowing the signs of the times. and that there is no secret that is a match for him, And so in my opinion, Satan gave the list of 112, knowing now would be the time of the end of the rule of the Gentiles, and Jews will be grafted back in, to finish to fulfill the rest of their part, in the end times prophecies.
And so now many Roman Catholics believe Francis to be Peter the Roman, or the one to come after him to be Peter The Roman. And many Roman Catholics believe that this final Pope will indeed be the Antichrist. This is what they believe of their own cult itself. And so here is a quick Catholic site which gives a brief overview on these St. Malachy prophecies of that R.C.C. cult itself.
What is the prophecy of St. Malachy?
Throughout history someone is always predicting doomsday, but the hype about Malachy is, as they say, a bunch of malarkey.uscatholic.org
Petrus Romanus, The Final Pope is Here
For more than 800 years scholars have pointed to the da…www.goodreads.com
Prophecy of the Popes - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Was Saint Peter the first pope? | GotQuestions.org
Was Saint Peter the first pope? Was Peter the supreme authority over the other Apostles? Was Peter the founder of the Roman Catholic Church?www.gotquestions.org
Is the Pope the Antichrist?
For centuries, people have believed that the pope of the RCC is the Antichrist, but is that a valid position to embrace? Is the pope a Christian?g3min.org
You accuse ME of lying – then YOU post this idiotic argument about “Vicarius Fili Dei” adding up to “666”.
Assigning so much evil to an institution that focuses on helping people is a sign of psychosis. Such an evil institution could never grow to be among largest charities in the world, and would have immediately collapsed, not last for 2000 years.
Having not read through all of this yet, I have to comment.
I looked it up. Nostradamus said no such thing. Why don't you quote him directly instead of making up nonsense.
That may be, it is a pro-life web site with an anti-Francis agenda.
As I have stated publicly, up until now I referenced and shared your prudent position of reserving judgment until we know exactly what the Pachamama statue represents along with what happened in Rome.On October 4, Pope Francis attended an act of idolatrous worship of the pagan goddess Pachamama. He allowed this worship to take place in the Vatican Gardens, thus desecrating the vicinity of the graves of the martyrs and of the church of the Apostle Peter. He participated in this act of idolatrous worship by blessing a wooden image of Pachamama. On October 7, the idol of Pachamama was placed in front of the main altar at St. Peter’s and then carried in procession to the Synod Hall. Pope Francis said prayers in a ceremony involving this image and then joined in this procession. When wooden images of this pagan deity were removed from the church of Santa Maria in Traspontina, where they had been sacrilegiously placed, and thrown into the Tiber by Catholics outraged by this profanation of the church, Pope Francis, on October 25, apologized for their removal and another wooden image of Pachamama was returned to the church. Thus, a new profanation was initiated. On October 27, in the closing Mass for the synod, he accepted a bowl used in the idolatrous worship of Pachamama and placed it on the altar.
The Pope, the Amazon, and Pachamama
www.patheos.com
www.patheos.com
Nostradamus or the Pope.
Convicted child molester? Where is the evidence of this, please.
I feel sorry for the guy. People make up all kinds of nonsense that they say is biblical about him when it's tripe.Pope Francis Defended: Resources for Confused or Troubled Folks
Pope Francis Defended: Resources For Confused Folks
A collection of explanatory articles (311+) that defend Pope Francis against accusations of erroneous teaching, heresy, ignorance, equivocation, arrogance, etc. ad nauseam.
Ah, further proof that congressional stuff cannot be trusted.... even though God appointed those people.
