In reading my initial post you'll see it was a request for clarification.Aren't you doing the same though? You are objecting to the wording in the scripture arent you?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
In reading my initial post you'll see it was a request for clarification.Aren't you doing the same though? You are objecting to the wording in the scripture arent you?
In reading my initial post you'll see it was a request for clarification.
It's a VERY dangerous thing to try to STEAL Israel's identity. Israel wannabees are on very dangerous ground.Jesus Christ fulfilled the promises and covenant made to Abraham, the Church is the Israel of God, children of the promised seed, it's that simple
The promises made to Abraham have been fulfilled in Jesus Christ, read it again and again
Jesus Christ is the promised seed, and his children are the Church
Galatians 3:16-29KJV
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
(Two Israel's Are Seen Below)
(1) Israel The Church, Children Of The Promised Seed
(2) National Ethnic Israel (Flesh)
The Church is the Israel of God, children of the promised seed
They which are the children of the flesh (Ethnic Israel) these are not the children of God
Romans 9:6-8KJV
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all (1)Israel, which are of (2)Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
The church hasn't replaced Israel.It's a VERY dangerous thing to try to STEAL Israel's identity. Israel wannabees are on very dangerous ground.
Once Again: Jesus Christ fulfilled the promises and covenant made to Abraham, the Church is the Israel of God, children of the promised seed, it's that simpleSo it is. You just object to the wording.
Thank you.
You Reject The Fact Jesus Fulfilled The Promises And Covenants Made To Abraham, As You've Been Shown Several TimesThe church hasn't replaced Israel.
If one accepts that we are all one in Christ,no Jew,Gentile,etc...
Revelation 7:4
And I heard the number of the sealed, 144,000, sealed from every tribe of the sons of Israel:
Thinking Christians are saved while Israel is replaced by us is replacement theology.
Adherents often object to that term however,it is a synopsis of their errant teaching.
Scripture properly understood does not support antisemitism.
The Church ?The church hasn't replaced Israel.
If one accepts that we are all one in Christ,no Jew,Gentile,etc...
Revelation 7:4
And I heard the number of the sealed, 144,000, sealed from every tribe of the sons of Israel:
Thinking Christians are saved while Israel is replaced by us is replacement theology.
Adherents often object to that term however,it is a synopsis of their errant teaching.
Scripture properly understood does not support antisemitism.
Israel exist in the mideast, their not God's chosen as you believe and teach, Jesus fulfilled the promises and covenants made to Israel, the Church is the Israel of God as scripture clearly teachesIt's a VERY dangerous thing to try to STEAL Israel's identity. Israel wannabees are on very dangerous ground.
Well said.It's a VERY dangerous thing to try to STEAL Israel's identity. Israel wannabees are on very dangerous ground.
I read your attached article, it's standard dispensationalism using the Charles Caldwell Ryrie study BibleWell said.
You might enjoy this.
![]()
Matthew 21:43: Who Will Receive the Kingdom of God? - The Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry
Share on Facebookwww.foi.org
Trump is his own god. He believes he is Apollo .... that's the point. He doesn't acknowledge Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord. He denied Christ before men, publicly on TV... "I don't ask forgiveness. I don't bring God into that picture" ....and has never recanted that statement.What is good about swearing on holy scriptures anyway, I do not see where that is encouraged at all (swearing or taking oaths). Whether on Gods words or the constitition, James does not at all encourage this (though it is traditional).
Traditions are often shown as winning out over the word of God, but I figured to ask where this is encouraged?
Post evidence of his saying this.Trump is his own god. He believes he is Apollo ....
That's false.that's the point. He doesn't acknowledge Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord.
That is untrue.He denied Christ before men, publicly on TV...
He explained why he said that."I don't ask forgiveness. I don't bring God into that picture" ....and has never recanted that statement.
Sounds like a sore loser in the face of the fact that Donald J. Trump won the election in a landslideTrump is his own god. He believes he is Apollo .... that's the point. He doesn't acknowledge Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord. He denied Christ before men, publicly on TV... "I don't ask forgiveness. I don't bring God into that picture" ....and has never recanted that statement.
I don't see how "not" swearing an oath on the Holy scriptures means one is their own God. Personally, I would refuse to do that but that sure wouldn't mean (on my part) that I believe I am my own God somehow because I would not do that. (Although I have sworn an oath in the past, I would not now, or in the future)Trump is his own god. He believes he is Apollo .... that's the point. He doesn't acknowledge Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord. He denied Christ before men, publicly on TV... "I don't ask forgiveness. I don't bring God into that picture" ....and has never recanted that statement.
It doesn't.I don't see how "not" swearing an oath on the Holy scriptures means one is their own God.
Yes,it is speculation. The FLOTUS arrived with the Bibles after the oath was underway. The Bibles were there beside him. And he swore before God ho do his duty. So, for me his hand not also being on the Bibles doesn't nullify his commitment to God and country.Personally, I would refuse to do that but that sure wouldn't mean (on my part) that I believe I am my own God somehow because I would not do that. (Although I have sworn an oath in the past, I would not now, or in the future)
Besides Trump did it before in his first term so its not like he has any conviction about not doing that, it is somewhat of a tradition to do that. Not that I think he gave not doing so much thought, and so why he did not is up for speculation.
I didn't say he should have placed his hand on the Bible. And yet, he's taking an oath anyway, so if his reason for not placing his hand in the Bible was that scripture says something against taking oaths, he should have refused to take an oath at all. lolI don't see how "not" swearing an oath on the Holy scriptures means one is their own God. Personally, I would refuse to do that but that sure wouldn't mean (on my part) that I believe I am my own God somehow because I would not do that. (Although I have sworn an oath in the past, I would not now, or in the future)
Half right. So also does an individual know.Only God knows if any of us are his.
You couldn't resist but it's true.@TLHKAJ, when I said,
Verily speaking,
What is good about swearing on holy scriptures anyway, I do not see where that is encouraged at all (swearing or taking oaths). Whether on Gods words or the constitition, James does not at all encourage this (though it is traditional).
You answered my post firstly by saying,
Trump is his own god. He believes he is Apollo .... that's the point.
And to this response I stated firstly,
I don't see how "not" swearing an oath on the Holy scriptures means one is their own God.
(since you are quoting my post and I am trying to make the connections you are making)
To which you replied to my post in part cutting the second half of post #55 off when saying,
I didn't say he should have placed his hand on the Bible. And yet, he's taking an oath anyway,
Verily speaking,
Which is why I added in my first post, " Whether on Gods words or the constitition" I am speaking to oath itself
You continue,
so if his reason for not placing his hand in the Bible was that scripture says something against taking oaths, he should have refused to take an oath at all. lol So we know that wasn't the reason.
The other half of the paragraph in post #55 you excluded in your response already acknowledges this
Besides Trump did it before in his first term so its not like he has any conviction about not doing that, it is somewhat of a tradition to do that. Not that I think he gave not doing so much thought, and so why he did not is up for speculation.
And that its up for speculation, and then you said,
And yes, he honors the god of forces in his estate because he is infatuated with Apollo, and fancies himself to be the incarnated Apollo.
Me,
Why not rather post proofs of things you accuse him of? That way you appear less like a reviler of "the gods" right?
Exodus 22:28 Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.
I couldnt resist that one, sorry![]()