Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

[rjs330]

The problem with this analysis it is not proof but suspect movements of figures. Biden had a lot of support so did Trump. It was close. Until you can admit that things are delusional.
500,000 votes is just 0.33% so though it sounds a lot a 7% leads dwarfs it.

There currently is nothing but exaguration and slander going on from the Trump camp. If you overthrow an election on this you destroy democracy. Once the propoganda grows it can build to anger. Are you this nuts, because it is sounding like this

Have we just moved the goal posts here? First there was a cry for evidence. Now we have a cry for proof. There is a lot of evidence. And that evidence could lead to proof. It remains to be seen. This isn't over yet. And you don't poof evidence out quickly. Especially when it involves so many people in so many areas. It's not like a simple crime. It's a massive undertaking. In many states involving thousands of people and thousands of votes.

You think it can just happen over night? It's going to take time and last I knew we have only been a week past the election and we already have quite a bit of evidence. And more coming every day.

So it's not a conspiracy. It's a FACT that we have evidence. Now whether or not it is enough the prove that there is enough of it to overturn any results I don't know. And neither do you.

You don't have any idea whether the results were legit in these states. You are guessing.

You SHOULD be cheering on the process, so that ALL of us are assured that all has been done to make sure the process was legitimate and we can all have our faith restored. Once this is over if Biden wins then so be it. If Trump wins then I hope you will not make nefarious claims.

Because we just want the rule of law be followed. If you want Biden to win and are willing to set aside laws in order to make it happen, well I wonder what that says.

 

[rjs330]

You do not see the democratic system of the USA creates the opportunity of greatness, not the pursuit of greatness.

People want to be the best at what they do. Put that together and you get the best society. That is the winning formula. It makes the US economy strong. It relies on real risk takers, and success makers.

Is this what Donald is offering or just propoganda and a power grab?

Looks like a power grab. He lost fair and square, get used to it.

How is asking for the law to be followed a.power grab?

 

[Grailhunter]

VICTOR JOECKS: Clark County election officials accepted my signature — on 8 ballot envelopes

Clark County election officials accepted same signature — on 8 ballot envelopes”

 

[FollowHim]

Have we just moved the goal posts here? First there was a cry for evidence. Now we have a cry for proof. There is a lot of evidence. And that evidence could lead to proof. It remains to be seen. This isn't over yet. And you don't poof evidence out quickly. Especially when it involves so many people in so many areas. It's not like a simple crime. It's a massive undertaking. In many states involving thousands of people and thousands of votes.

You think it can just happen over night? It's going to take time and last I knew we have only been a week past the election and we already have quite a bit of evidence. And more coming every day.

So it's not a conspiracy. It's a FACT that we have evidence. Now whether or not it is enough the prove that there is enough of it to overturn any results I don't know. And neither do you.

You don't have any idea whether the results were legit in these states. You are guessing.

You SHOULD be cheering on the process, so that ALL of us are assured that all has been done to make sure the process was legitimate and we can all have our faith restored. Once this is over if Biden wins then so be it. If Trump wins then I hope you will not make nefarious claims.

Because we just want the rule of law be followed. If you want Biden to win and are willing to set aside laws in order to make it happen, well I wonder what that says.

I read a report that a major law firm putting forward Trumps accusations has withdrawn from the case. The obvious conclusion is lawyers know what is evidence and what is hearsay. Their reputation is to represent people with a case. If a 5 minute hearing will dismiss the case, they simply do not want to be involved.

Too many people are saying they have evidence when it is just exaggerated conjecture. I work as a business analyst where facts and actual processes matter and how you restructure them. It is a serious affair to accuse a large organisation of fraud and failure, a large number of peoples jobs on the line, let alone implications on the country. If it is literally someone was having coffee and they overheard another fellow claim that this ballot here was filled in falsely etc. The whole exercise is an exercise in fishing for fraud and corruption, not because it is known about.

And there is a legal process to go down if there is a real case. If this is just smokescreen and lies, who is the fool, and who is listening to the fool?

How could anyone could negotiate with someone like this, who will change everything the moment they walk out the door. Negotiation relies on respect, and lawyers cannot lie or they get struck off. Maybe politicians should be held to the same legal standard. What price is paid to cause this level of antagonism and anger? Defamation of good people for ones own gain is the reasons people are taken to court for damages.

I am not interested in who wins, just that christians testify to the truth and stand for integrity, righteousness and His name. Calling folk satan and unworthy of governance is not a good position to take if all they are doing is following the right and just process of a democratic state.

A liar who lies constantly is not from the Lord, of the Lord or knows the Lord. If one puts loyalty to this fellow before loyalty to God, then one has abandoned the Lord of All. God bless you

 

[FollowHim]

How is asking for the law to be followed a.power grab?

A power grab is claiming they have won an election when everything is pointing the other way, and claiming the only reason this has happened is because of fraud and lies. In terms of a democracy this is the definition of a power grab, illegitimately, by overturning the legal vote with another interpretation and stirring up others to believe this alternate reality.

So what if the democrats won. Another 4 years, bungled economy, health disaster and the republicans can get in again. That is how it works. You would think people had never lived through elections before and disappointments. God bless you

 

[Heart2Soul]

"The courts would have to consider that the fraud involves millions of people. That would seem to be highly unlikely. "

Really, you say millions would have to be committing the fraud..you are joking, right..a little over the top....lol Yes, millions were affected by the hundreds that participated in the fraud. indeed.

"There is still no proof for massive election fraud."

Again false..there is proof of MASSIVE fraud. I guess you want the fake media to show you on TV all the names involved in the fraud, the actual ballot affected, the compromise SW code, all the names of the fraudsters like in a criminal investigation before you can say there is proof....I hope you don't believe this is called your proof, or maybe you want all this info delivered to your front door by mail...lol

Thanks for the small talk...later

Voters in Michigan are filing lawsuits against the state's election board because when they went to vote in person they were told they already voted by mail in ballot. When they denied doing that the employee got hateful with them.

 

[Heart2Soul]

I read a report that a major law firm putting forward Trumps accusations has withdrawn from the case. The obvious conclusion is lawyers know what is evidence and what is hearsay. Their reputation is to represent people with a case. If a 5 minute hearing will dismiss the case, they simply do not want to be involved.

Too many people are saying they have evidence when it is just exaggerated conjecture. I work as a business analyst where facts and actual processes matter and how you restructure them. It is a serious affair to accuse a large organisation of fraud and failure, a large number of peoples jobs on the line, let alone implications on the country. If it is literally someone was having coffee and they overheard another fellow claim that this ballot here was filled in falsely etc. The whole exercise is an exercise in fishing for fraud and corruption, not because it is known about.

And there is a legal process to go down if there is a real case. If this is just smokescreen and lies, who is the fool, and who is listening to the fool?

How could anyone could negotiate with someone like this, who will change everything the moment they walk out the door. Negotiation relies on respect, and lawyers cannot lie or they get struck off. Maybe politicians should be held to the same legal standard. What price is paid to cause this level of antagonism and anger? Defamation of good people for ones own gain is the reasons people are taken to court for damages.

I am not interested in who wins, just that christians testify to the truth and stand for integrity, righteousness and His name. Calling folk satan and unworthy of governance is not a good position to take if all they are doing is following the right and just process of a democratic state.

A liar who lies constantly is not from the Lord, of the Lord or knows the Lord. If one puts loyalty to this fellow before loyalty to God, then one has abandoned the Lord of All. God bless you

Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani are Trumps attorneys and they have not withdrawn from filing the lawsuits.

 

[JohnDB]

Woah woah woah...

There is evidence. There's all kinds of evidence.

Now whether a Judge, having jurisdiction in this matter, considers this evidence is of enough quality and quantity to be sufficient to overturn the current status of the election is another matter.

Are the affadavit sworn testimonies of people believable?
Are they consistent with other testimony?
Are these people reliable?
Is what is being demonstrated believable and reliable fact?

Judges take these things and more into consideration.

There is evidence.

I wish people would quit claiming that there's no evidence.

 

[APAK]

SHOCKING EXCLUSIVE: WE CAUGHT THEM! Pennsylvania Results Show a Statistically Impossible Pattern Behind Biden’s Steal! WE CAUGHT THEM!
By Joe Hoft
Published November 13, 2020 at 6:47pm

EXCLUSIVE: Based on Reports By Auditors, IT Specialists, Data Analysts, and Statisticians - The Number of Illegitimate Votes Identified In Four Swing States Are Enough to Overturn Election

On election night President Trump totally run away with the election in Pennsylvania.

President Trump was ahead of Joe Biden by nearly 700,000 votes! It was an insurmountable lead.

The President was still ahead in Pennsylvania with 56% of the vote to Biden’s 43% the next morning.

The President was winning Pennsylvania and held a 675,000 vote lead in the election over Joe Biden.

What happened next was corrupt and criminal as the Democrats went about to steal Pennsylvania for Biden.
They took a Trump landslide and they criminally flipped it to Joe Biden.

According to Pennsylvania’s election returns website, on election day President Trump won nearly two thirds of all votes cast in the state.

The President won 2.7 million votes compared Biden’s 1.4 million votes. The President’s votes were nearly twice as many as Joe Biden’s!

But what happened next was shocking. Pennsylvania began counting ballots by mail. There was no reporting on how many votes were outstanding at the end of election night. There was no reporting ever that we are aware of where the state announced how many votes were left to count after the election.

They just kept counting.

The state also allowed votes to come in for three more days after the election. Of course these were all mail in ballots. We do not know how many mail in votes came in during these three days. The Republicans were not allowed to observe the counting of these votes even though a court order was in place demanding the state to do so. These actions go against the state’s constitution which state the voting process is to be determined by the legislature. The change in ruling was implemented by the executive and judicial branches. This is a important issue with the Trump campaign in their complaints against the state as they try to undo the injustices in Pennsylvania.

Today the state is reporting more than 2.5 million mail in ballots. This number was never seen before in this state. As the mail-in ballots were counted, the state began cutting into the President’s 675,000 vote lead and eventually they gave the election to Biden. Biden won 2 million of the 2.5 million mail-in ballots.

How could the President receive only one fifth of the mail in ballots after crushing Biden in the election on Election Day? The answer is this was impossible. And here’s why.
When we looked at this data with the help of a top level data expert who remains anonymous, we identified a pattern that is statistically impossible. The President won two thirds of the election day vote. But with the exception of a basically Philadelphia, the President won around 80% of the vote in each county in the state. (See the blue line in the chart below showing the percent of election day votes won by President Trump.) Philadelphia is so large it offsets these numbers and brings the President’s results down to around 65% of the state’s votes on election day.

What happened with the mail in votes is what is statistically impossible (See the orange line below). In almost every county throughout the state, the President was awarded a percent of votes 40% less than the percent the President won on election day (see the grey line below). If Trump won a county by 80% of the vote on election day, he won 40% of the mail in vote for a county. If the President won 60% of the vote on election day he won 20% of the mail in vote in another county. This pattern occurred in almost every county with the only noticeable exception of Philadelphia, where the President only earned 30% of the vote on Election Day.

These numbers are so consistent that they are almost certainly fraudulent. This is statistically impossible. This NEVER happens in data sets.

Again, the fact that the mail-in votes and election day votes mirrored each other as revealed in the diagram above is impossible.

They got caught.

It is clear that corrupt Democrats in Pennsylvania did all they could to steal the 2020 Presidential election for Joe Biden. There was no excitement for the Biden campaign and there still isn’t. Republicans are convinced he cheated.

Tonight we caught them.

------------------------

 

[APAK]

Voters in Michigan are filing lawsuits against the state's election board because when they went to vote in person they were told they already voted by mail in ballot. When they denied doing that the employee got hateful with them.

I hope justice will be served, and it will...in time

 

[Heart2Soul]

 

[April_Rose]

Woah woah woah...

There is evidence. There's all kinds of evidence.

Now whether a Judge, having jurisdiction in this matter, considers this evidence is of enough quality and quantity to be sufficient to overturn the current status of the election is another matter.

Are the affadavit sworn testimonies of people believable?
Are they consistent with other testimony?
Are these people reliable?
Is what is being demonstrated believable and reliable fact?

Judges take these things and more into consideration.

There is evidence.

I wish people would quit claiming that there's no evidence.

Well Jesus said He as God,.. demonstrated He was God in the flesh and proved it,.. yet He was still crucified for supposedly (although not in actuality) for being a lunatic anyways. Seems like the world hasn't changed that much. It's still as crazy as hell.

 

[Heart2Soul]

Woah woah woah...

There is evidence. There's all kinds of evidence.

Now whether a Judge, having jurisdiction in this matter, considers this evidence is of enough quality and quantity to be sufficient to overturn the current status of the election is another matter.

Are the affadavit sworn testimonies of people believable?
Are they consistent with other testimony?
Are these people reliable?
Is what is being demonstrated believable and reliable fact?

Judges take these things and more into consideration.

There is evidence.

I wish people would quit claiming that there's no evidence.

In Democratic controlled states the judges are.very liberal.

 

[amigo de christo]

It's been 290 for Biden,.. but Trump was at 217 before.

TAKE A PEEK AT THIS .

 

[WaterSong]

I find it interesting the turn of events in this election.
When Trump was elected the left accused Russia of rigging the voting. As President Trump's first term went along the Dem's accused Trump of all manner of wrong doing. They even went to the ridiculous measure of seeking his impeachment in the House. A smoke screen intended to take the attention of voters off the actual wrong doing of the Democrats. And also a pursuit intending to put a negative mark on Trump's presidential legacy, which Nancy Pelosi admitted.

Now come the reelection bid of Trump there is actual evidence of interference in the election process and fraud. It is as if the Dem's do not believe the American voters are intelligent or astute enough to notice this. What they've charged Trump with after he won the election in 2016 is precisely what they've committed to in the 2020 election. The difference is, there is evidence of their corruption.

Colluding to rig an election is a grievous offense against America and the voters and non-voters alike. I think when all is said and done every person involved should be arrested and prosecuted. Regardless of their station. This would send a message that may perhaps forewarn any party or individuals in future of committing to the same effort in future.

 

[JohnDB]

In Democratic controlled states the judges are.very liberal.

Then there's SCOTUS that will pluck a case from a lower federal court...

We are talking about voter fraud in at least three states.
Dead people voting and late mailed ballots and unsupervised ballots being counted when Democrats got the biggest gains are usually sufficient for overturned Election results.

Then there's turncoats... people who participated in voter fraud who rat themselves and others out.

 

[Heart2Soul]

Then there's SCOTUS that will pluck a case from a lower federal court...

We are talking about voter fraud in at least three states.
Dead people voting and late mailed ballots and unsupervised ballots being counted when Democrats got the biggest gains are usually sufficient for overturned Election results.

Then there's turncoats... people who participated in voter fraud who rat themselves and others out.

Yes and all the mail in ballots that came in after the polling places were closed were all Biden.

 

[WaterSong]

TAKE A PEEK AT THIS .

Thank you so much for finding and posting this here.
And it still appears on YouTube! That has to be an oversight on their part.

Shouldn't the name have forewarned everyone? "Dominion" voting systems.

 

[Heart2Soul]

TAKE A PEEK AT THIS .

I love Lou Dobbs

 

[amigo de christo]

In Democratic controlled states the judges are.very liberal.

YES my friend take a peek at this