Presidential Election Live Coverage 2020

[APAK]

LANDSLIDE INCOMING: Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit
November 14, 2020 Niamh Harris News, US 4

Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz has promised that President Trump is set to win a lawsuit his campaign filed in Pennsylvania challenging the legitimacy of mail-in ballots received after Election Day.

LANDSLIDE INCOMING: Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

Dershowitz predicted that the U.S. Supreme Court would take on Trump’s lawsuit if the number of votes being challenged are enough to change the outcome of the presidential election in Pennsylvania.

“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit,” Dershowitz said during an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, “namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day but not received until after Election Day.”

“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that and the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic. That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections,” Dershowitz added.

 

[FollowHim]

These invented ideas will probably end up in arrests, with invented prison sentences....but it will be all to real for the people in the cells.
You take to much stock into the propaganda. lol But as they say the proof is in the pudding.

There is a track record of the same people working on elections, election after election.
It is hard to imagine that one will be so different from the previous, and so likewise the common issues are failures.
After dealing with large databases and how information is held there is always a 80/20 rule. 20% of the data will cause a problem.
And you have to work you way through it as best you can. Unfortunately unless you spend the time and resources you will get issues, glitches etc. What you are claiming is intentional behaviour not data issues. I would always favour data issues unless it is statistically beyond the regular experience of such problems.

I am not taking any propaganda, I just dislike liars and people who exaggerate for their own benefit and accuse others of criminal activity without proof. It seems this principle of innocent until proven guilty is not part of the Trump fraud followers or accusations. This in itself is not constitutional. If one claims to be defending the nation you do not set about destroying it.

God bless you

 

[Bobby Jo]

... Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit
...

It still seems to me that the 500K SWITCHED Votes and 2.5M DELETED Votes are the TARGET. -- Everything else is fluff ( - distraction - ).

Bobby Jo

 

[FollowHim]

LANDSLIDE INCOMING: Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit
November 14, 2020 Niamh Harris News, US 4

Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz has promised that President Trump is set to win a lawsuit his campaign filed in Pennsylvania challenging the legitimacy of mail-in ballots received after Election Day.

LANDSLIDE INCOMING: Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

Dershowitz predicted that the U.S. Supreme Court would take on Trump’s lawsuit if the number of votes being challenged are enough to change the outcome of the presidential election in Pennsylvania.

“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit,” Dershowitz said during an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, “namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day but not received until after Election Day.”

“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that and the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic. That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections,” Dershowitz added.

Interesting point. This is not fraud, it is a legal interpretation question, and it has unknown consequences, some have suggested very small.
It is ironic that the one legal case that will probably stand is not about stealing an election, fraud or criminal behaviour.

It is grieving that the idea of hurting innocent other parties is deemed as justice or a good outcome when spoken by people who claim to know Jesus. What is the point of winning a point but losing ones soul?

God bless you

 

[JohnDB]

LANDSLIDE INCOMING: Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit
November 14, 2020 Niamh Harris News, US 4

Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz has promised that President Trump is set to win a lawsuit his campaign filed in Pennsylvania challenging the legitimacy of mail-in ballots received after Election Day.

LANDSLIDE INCOMING: Dershowitz Says Trump Set to Win Pennsylvania Lawsuit

Dershowitz predicted that the U.S. Supreme Court would take on Trump’s lawsuit if the number of votes being challenged are enough to change the outcome of the presidential election in Pennsylvania.

“I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit,” Dershowitz said during an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, “namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day but not received until after Election Day.”

“The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that and the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic. That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections,” Dershowitz added.

Pennsylvania is not sufficient for Trump to win the election by electoral votes. He needs another couple of states as well.

And if his claims are exaggerated in any fashion his entire suit will be tossed.

 

[Bobby Jo]

.. if his claims are exaggerated in any fashion his entire suit will be tossed.

Seems to me these are only "practice swings" to keep the crowd involved. The "batter over the plate" will be when the Dominion tampering comes to the courts. And then it won't be a few Electoral College Votes, -- it'll be the WHOLE ELECTION sent directly to Congress. HOME RUN!

Bobby Jo

 

[APAK]

It still seems to me that the 500K SWITCHED Votes and 2.5M DELETED Votes are the TARGET. -- Everything else is fluff ( - distraction - ).

Bobby Jo

Well that is definitely in play as a major contributor...although this win from this article is the major leverage into calling the election null and void...

 

[Bobby Jo]

Well that is definitely in play as a major contributor...although this win from this article is the major leverage into calling the election null and void...

It's certainly bringing the "crowd" into the "game", and by all measures, they're "on their feet" clapping, cheering, and participating!

With Best Regards,
Bobby Jo

-- You know, it's almost as though everything is so well sequenced, it might have been planned since Creation for this President and this moment in history.

 

[WaterSong]

It's certainly bringing the "crowd" into the "game", and by all measures, they're "on their feet" clapping, cheering, and participating!

With Best Regards,
Bobby Jo

-- You know, it's almost as though everything is so well sequenced, it might have been planned since Creation for this President and this moment in history.

I believe so. Please consider this.

 

[amigo de christo]

If you want to know who is ruling this world . examine the mainstream news .
Look real close at it . AND whoever is not allowed to be criticized , THAT is who is ruling .
Who hollers pc the loudest . who hollers all this inclusvive stuff . ANY if anyone supports
or does anything that criticizes the agenda they get labled , well as haters , or whatever .
IF you wanna know who is truly of the darkness of this world , TURN ON YOUR mainline news and look who they criticize
and IF you criticize that view point , ITS not tolerated .
THOUGH they claim to be TOLERANT , watch them closely now .
IF you truly want to know who this evil in charge is , WHO are you not allowed to criticize in any way . AND if you do
HOW DARE THEE DO SO YE non conformer . YALL MARK MY WORDS . AMERICA is fast becoming no differerent than any communist regime .

 

[WaterSong]

If you want to know who is ruling this world . examine the mainstream news .
Look real close at it . AND whoever is not allowed to be criticized , THAT is who is ruling .
Who hollers pc the loudest . who hollers all this inclusvive stuff . ANY if anyone supports
or does anything that criticizes the agenda they get labled , well as haters , or whatever .
IF you wanna know who is truly of the darkness of this world , TURN ON YOUR mainline news and look who they criticize
and IF you criticize that view point , ITS not tolerated .
THOUGH they claim to be TOLERANT , watch them closely now .
IF you truly want to know who this evil in charge is , WHO are you not allowed to criticize in any way . AND if you do
HOW DARE THEE DO SO YE non conformer . YALL MARK MY WORDS . AMERICA is fast becoming no differerent than any communist regime .

I believe the investigation into the election fraud is precisely what prevents America from becoming like unto a communist regime.

I happened on One America News Network the other day. The host at that time was talking about the corruption being found in this election. One thing he said got me tickled. He said if you believe the main stream media Biden won. However, you have to remember, main stream media are a bunch of leftist corporate shills.

Yes they are!

 

[junobet]

Pennsylvania is not sufficient for Trump to win the election by electoral votes. He needs another couple of states as well.

And if his claims are exaggerated in any fashion his entire suit will be tossed.

Yes. Doing the math I’d say the actual impact would indeed be inexistent. Pennsylvania would go to Biden no matter whether late arriving ballots are in or out. Pa. received 10,000 ballots after polls closed on Election Day

We all are prone to wishful thinking ´and hope dies last, but there comes the point when wholesome hope mutates into an unwholesome denial of reality.

 

[APAK]

Pennsylvania is not sufficient for Trump to win the election by electoral votes. He needs another couple of states as well.

And if his claims are exaggerated in any fashion his entire suit will be tossed.

You are missing the point that this article does not address nor should it. It cannot of course cannot address everything....you are expecting an exclusive all in one article to satisfy your mind completely, now, in one swoop. That will never happen.

As I just mentioned to BJ, this win even if comes about in the PA, is only one of several building blocks that will all eventually land in the laps of the Supreme Court to decide upon, and then the House to vote on under the 12th Amendment...just my opinion..

You seem to be saying Trump's team needs 100% proof of all the ballots in question to reach 270 from several States. As if they have to be nicely tied in one package, ready to be presented to a court. It just does not work that way.

However, to get there one has to think more openly and how the law works. As this one article provides a path, not a final destination.

Say that Trump's defense has many hundreds of valid testimonies, data, recordings, documentation, from say 30 States, that all point to voting fraud and false ballots and deleted, stuffed ballots etc. They will NEVER have all of this evidence, every ONE of these soiled ballots or even harder maybe the deleted ballots. And they do not need to...

If there is a PREPONDERANCE of EVIDENCE and SUFFICIENT (meaning volumes of data, of various kinds) prima facia evidence to show grand fraud, the courts will take on and decide on this very Constitutional matter, of national voting.

BL: you don't have to account for all the ballots that are fake, fraud, deleted and should be discarded...if you have say 50% in hand with solid proof, then the entire other 50% not accounted for, not in your possession will also be thrown out.....that is how this number of 270 is going to be reached via the contribution of various States......and eventually with a House vote..IMO

 

[APAK]

And then there is this path to 270

Excerpts from the ..

TRUMP HAS WON BY DEFAULT—Here’s why!
Posted on November 11, 2020 by State of the Nation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 270 Electoral Vote Threshold
There is a profound and pervasive misunderstanding about the 270 electoral votes necessary to win the U.S. presidential election.

Yes, 270 are required to win, but if a candidate’s campaign engages in a massive voting fraud and/or election theft operation, they have automatically disqualified themselves from the race. Especially when such a highly organized operation was conducted with the explicit purpose to steal the election have the perpetrators rendered themselves unfit to serve in high office.

Much of that rapidly growing body of evidence is scientifically based and data-driven; some of it is anecdotal and circumstantial, still other conclusive proofs are being submitted in the form of videos, photos and audios. Then there are the missing or destroyed or altered ballots themselves which are showing up near or at the numerous crime scenes across the country. The Democrat’s mail-in ballot fraud is perhaps the greatest systematic crime spree ever implemented.

What’s the critical point?

All President Trump has to do is prove that Team Biden (which includes the Democrat Party) carried out intentional fraud to steal the election, which they did to a tremendous degree and IN BROAD DAYLIGHT. The Democrat perpetrators did not even care if they got caught. Not only that, they barely tried to cover up their criminal activity leaving their fingerprints all over the myriad crime scenes.

In other words, once the intentional fraud was committed, Joe Biden and Kamal Harris effectively lost their right to further stand for the election. That means President Trump will be inaugurated on January 20, 2020.

The SCOTUS ruled in a landmark case UNITED STATES v. THROCKMORTON (98 US 61 – Supreme Court 1878) that “fraud vitiates everything”.[1]

KEY POINT: By categorically asserting that “fraud vitiates everything”, the SCOTUS affirms that perpetrating fraud undermines the entire endeavor, the whole contract, the complete judgment, the final result … or the election outcome, etc. Once the fraud is proven, the enterprise in its entirety, such as a POTUS candidacy or campaign, has been irreparably tainted and any result is invalidated. In order words, if it was only the Michigan vote was stolen by Team Biden, their victory would still have been nullified since “fraud vitiates everything”. (“Vitiates” in this legal context means negates, quashes, annuls, invalidates, revokes and abrogates) See: Let’s be very clear about the 2020 election outcome: “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING”.

(It's call disqualification..this is not an election for a prom queen....)

APAK

 

[Grailhunter]

There is a track record of the same people working on elections, election after election.
It is hard to imagine that one will be so different from the previous, and so likewise the common issues are failures.
After dealing with large databases and how information is held there is always a 80/20 rule. 20% of the data will cause a problem.
And you have to work you way through it as best you can. Unfortunately unless you spend the time and resources you will get issues, glitches etc. What you are claiming is intentional behaviour not data issues. I would always favour data issues unless it is statistically beyond the regular experience of such problems.

I am not taking any propaganda, I just dislike liars and people who exaggerate for their own benefit and accuse others of criminal activity without proof. It seems this principle of innocent until proven guilty is not part of the Trump fraud followers or accusations. This in itself is not constitutional. If one claims to be defending the nation you do not set about destroying it.

God bless you

I am not much into conspiracy theories but that nothing to do with this.
If you cannot deal wight liars...stay out of politics.
It seems this principle of innocent until proven guilty is not part of the Trump fraud followers or accusations.
This statement here is completely and totally wrong..He as all the proof....Your claim itself is lie.

 

[WaterSong]

Shocking History of Dominion Voting
November 10, 2020

Dominion Voting Systems Corp. is the Canadian company behind the ballot switching software.

Dominion was founded in 2003, with a mission to provide electronic voting systems friendly for progressives. Because of such partisanship, it languished with almost no customers for the next 5-6 years, until the Obama administration came to power. In 2010, the Obama administration confiscated electronic voting systems assets (software, intellectual property, manufacturing tools, customer base, etc.) from two established American companies, and gave them to Dominion. At the same time, Dominion got some employees and assets from a foreign EVS company, tied to Hugo Chavez.

Its software has been used by some 40% of the voters in this elections, mostly by Democrat-controlled states and election commissions. Apparently, no protections were put in place against ballot switching, deletion, or creation. According to Dominion’s own website, it software was used in “battleground” states and the largest Democrat states, including MI, GA, AZ, NV, NM, CO, AK, UT, NJ, CA, NY. (continues @ this link)


What Joe Biden and the Dem's and even Rino's who conspired together to steal this election forgot: (Dominion is located in Canada)
The White House
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
Foreign Policy

Issued on: September 12, 2018

 

[FollowHim]

I am not much into conspiracy theories but that nothing to do with this.
If you cannot deal wight liars...stay out of politics.
It seems this principle of innocent until proven guilty is not part of the Trump fraud followers or accusations.
This statement here is completely and totally wrong..He as all the proof....Your claim itself is lie.

Trump "has all the proof"

He is just like any human without evidence, looking for clues and pushing for something he hopes is there.
The whole reason for courts, police, procedures is to arrest, collect evidence and prosecute the guilty party.

If there are no arrests, no investigations and prosecutions then there is no evidence.
It is clear that some judges are now prepared to open some ballots and look or inspect for evidence.
We will have to see if this approach discovers anything of significance.

In the end it does not matter what my opinion is, it is the discovery of facts which currently do not exist, just suppositions.
I have been with people who pick up emotional mood signals but not the reality, so follow their group.

It is how groups gain consensus. The group leader often determines the truth the group follow, Trump.
The group fails when either the facts overthrow the proposition so undermining the leaders authority and role or they redefine the truth to maintain the group above anything else. Stalin managed to do this in Soviet times, until he died. In the end democracy overthrows such power plays, because it upholds truth above the group and leader. And if you want a successful society, truth always has to take the lead.

Of course you have demonstrated the reverse logic of the group, those looking for facts and commenting on real progress are then the liars.
It is why this approach is so caustic and dangerous to go down. But the fake news propoganda band wagon has been running a long time, and the alternative truth agenda being played out. Little wonder the soldiers march to the growing drum beat.

God bless you

 

[FollowHim]

The letter, which was signed by former Democratic and Republican administration officials, called out attorneys representing Trump, citing the American Bar Association code of conduct barring lawyers from misleading the court.

"While an apparently defeated candidate has the right to pursue challenges that are authorized by law, it is an abuse of the rule of law to file charges that lack an objective evidentiary basis, and it is a violation of attorney ethics to represent a party that files such charges purely for political purposes," said Stuart Gerson, a former Justice Department official under the presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and one of the letter's signers.

When does complaining become intimidation and insurrection? When does inventing fraud on a criminal scale become a crime itself when there is literally only the accusation to support it?

 

[Bobby Jo]

...
The White House
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
Foreign Policy

Issued on: September 12, 2018

Who could have imagined that Trump would have issued such a thorough and comprehensive Election Interference Executive Order back in September, 2018, which might even be applied retroactive to the November, 2018 Election as well as this current November, 2020 Election!!! -- And yet these criminals STILL conspired to undermine our Election.


We're gonna need more jail cells, more orange "jump suits", and more magazine articles on how to get those pesky blood stains out of those orange jump suits.
Bobby Jo

 

[WaterSong]

I recall the words of Republican President Ronald Reagan many years ago.
"The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so."

In the case of the MSM that are liberal corporate shills, as an OAN host labeled them, that old truism, absence of evidence is not evidence, also comes to mind.
The truth is, there is plenty of evidence this election was corrupt. And corruption of the free election process is a federal offense, a felony.

Evidence of the impossible. Fully 98,000 people voted for Joe Biden and no one else in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Election Fraud: Evidence of Keystone State Chicanery During America’s 2020 Presidential Election


American Thinker

November 14, 2020
The Unintended Consequences of Voter Fraud
By H.P. Smith