"religion is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark."
"[anti-religion] is a fairytale for those afraid of the light."
Central to the religions of the world is the idea of "Heaven" embedded in the systems as the motivating force of life and or for the world, heaven either a final destination for the world to arrive at and build towards the realization of or the place that living a realized state throughout life has one end up at. This is the darkness for many and it is so as quite simply the effort required for change, the upheaval required, for those many is simply too much.
Now, religions advocating such a truth at least for the whole of wo/mankind shows that universalism is what they believe in - that there be a one law by which heaven is possible. So, what could this one law be?
A = A
Now, the above is known as the law of identity, every man and woman such and all of us being named with our God, "I am", the one expression that admits of nothing other than the fact that we are.
Note that this truth of the I is shown by a difference between A's, one on the left and one on the right, difference in/as sameness defining identity. So, what terms is different from I and yet the same? Simple, take the whole of humanity and find that to yourself you are an I and all others a You, to others you the You, and all truly an I. What do we take from this?
I = You
This is what we take: every man, woman and child is an equal entitled to the same as all others and this entails the need for one set of universally applicable international law which speaks of dignity and respect and this is a requirement of the Holy itself. Now, we have already seen that "A=A" is the codification of "I am", but, given the introduction of the You, is there another expression it's speaking, perhaps something the equal stance relation speaks?
In A=A the absolute minimum number of A tokens there must be in order to relay A as type is two, the two necessary to identity and so possibility of the other. Now, what do you call it when two are caught as a willing mutual dependence, in an absolute equal stance of cooperating towards both being known as the one value their stance represents? You call it love. So, A=A speaks "I am" and "I love you" and as everything is an identity, the whole of existence confirms this truth.
Everything is an identity but existence is not only the collection of identities but the collection as an identity itself. "I am" - Name of God and this we've just proven.
Amen.
"[anti-religion] is a fairytale for those afraid of the light."
Central to the religions of the world is the idea of "Heaven" embedded in the systems as the motivating force of life and or for the world, heaven either a final destination for the world to arrive at and build towards the realization of or the place that living a realized state throughout life has one end up at. This is the darkness for many and it is so as quite simply the effort required for change, the upheaval required, for those many is simply too much.
Now, religions advocating such a truth at least for the whole of wo/mankind shows that universalism is what they believe in - that there be a one law by which heaven is possible. So, what could this one law be?
A = A
Now, the above is known as the law of identity, every man and woman such and all of us being named with our God, "I am", the one expression that admits of nothing other than the fact that we are.
Note that this truth of the I is shown by a difference between A's, one on the left and one on the right, difference in/as sameness defining identity. So, what terms is different from I and yet the same? Simple, take the whole of humanity and find that to yourself you are an I and all others a You, to others you the You, and all truly an I. What do we take from this?
I = You
This is what we take: every man, woman and child is an equal entitled to the same as all others and this entails the need for one set of universally applicable international law which speaks of dignity and respect and this is a requirement of the Holy itself. Now, we have already seen that "A=A" is the codification of "I am", but, given the introduction of the You, is there another expression it's speaking, perhaps something the equal stance relation speaks?
In A=A the absolute minimum number of A tokens there must be in order to relay A as type is two, the two necessary to identity and so possibility of the other. Now, what do you call it when two are caught as a willing mutual dependence, in an absolute equal stance of cooperating towards both being known as the one value their stance represents? You call it love. So, A=A speaks "I am" and "I love you" and as everything is an identity, the whole of existence confirms this truth.
Everything is an identity but existence is not only the collection of identities but the collection as an identity itself. "I am" - Name of God and this we've just proven.
Amen.
