Reviving Biblical Christianity (The Way) Part 2

[Episkopos]

What a sentence this is!

It's missing the "the" in front of creation.

 

[Lizbeth]

I hear crickets....
I don't think your dissenters will address this...it exposes their lies.

This is not difficult to address at all. I've moved on, but for your sake I'll reply. The very verse that Epi is referring to shows that the severity of God is for those in unbelief and the goodness of God is for this who stand in faith. Go look it up.

And we are not "wanting" God's severity to fall on anyone........that is another of his habitual false accusations trying to tell people what they believe, what they think and now even what they want. Like Jesus we are "not willing that any should perish", but sadly we know by God's word that it doesn't mean nobody will.

And yes, we need to be humble/meek and God-fearing, of course. But why does Epi assume that all those who don't embrace his message are not?

 

[Laurina]

This is not difficult to address at all. I've moved on, but for your sake I'll reply. The very verse that Epi is referring to shows that the severity of God is for those in unbelief and the goodness of God is for this who stand in faith. Go look it up.

And we are not "wanting" God's severity to fall on anyone........that is another of his habitual false accusations trying to tell people what they believe, what they think and now even what they want. Like Jesus we are "not willing that any should perish", but sadly we know by God's word that it doesn't mean nobody will.

And yes, we need to be humble/meek and God-fearing, of course. But why does Epi assume that all those who don't embrace his message are not?

I will venture a guess why....

First of all, you don't understand his message (proven by when you say or assume what he believes), and your claims PROVE you don't have humility or meekness, or the fear of the Lord. That about sums it up!
Example: Look at ALL what @amigo de christo SAYS (falsely) what @Episkopos believes. It's ALL lies!! Yet, you "like" his post content. That shows that YOU actually DON'T understand what Epi is saying. You don't bother to correct Amigo with ALL his twisting of words/misunderstanding (if...), and lies, you blanket "like" when he rails against Epi FALSELY (with his lies). ...YET, you take your time to explain to me quote: "but for your sake I'll reply" (thank-you, by the way).

Secondly, proving you have no fear of the Lord, you have mocked Epikopos' testimony...wow!! That's pretty far...and you've yet to answer to God for that...

 

[Episkopos]

This is not difficult to address at all. I've moved on, but for your sake I'll reply. The very verse that Epi is referring to shows that the severity of God is for those in unbelief and the goodness of God is for this who stand in faith. Go look it up.

And we are not "wanting" God's severity to fall on anyone........that is another of his habitual false accusations trying to tell people what they believe, what they think and now even what they want. Like Jesus we are "not willing that any should perish", but sadly we know by God's word that it doesn't mean nobody will.

And yes, we need to be humble/meek and God-fearing, of course. But why does Epi assume that all those who don't embrace his message are not?

Do you really think that God is looking for people who are not "against" holiness? You can't see the arrogance of your statements.

 

[amigo de christo]

Do you really think that God is looking for people who are not "against" holiness? You can't see the arrogance of your statements.

any jesus that omits the fact one must FIRST bELIEVE ON HIM , IS NOT THE JESUS CHRIST of GOD epi .
We are not against holiness
we are against the preaching of attaining holiness without BELIEF on CHRIST .
Just as hyper grace seems to follow another jesus
B IG TIME so too do those who push inclusivism upon us . neither side is following JESUS CHRIST .
You seem so admant to teach about holiness , about picking up ones cross
ab out being dead to self , AND YET refuse to state ONE MUST FIRST BELIEVE ON JESUS
For it is BY HIM and IN H IM that we attain holiness , righteousness , salvation , justiication .
I know what inclusvisim teaches epi . And it does make void the fact ONE MUST BELIEVE ON JESUS .
And yet beleives it follows this SAVOIR OF THE WORLD . But not it dont .
FOR If it did it would never have made void BELEIF IN JESUS . all it is
is a FORM of godliness that simply denies the one true gospel , WHICH IS THE POWER OF GOD .
Having a form of godliness but DENYING the power thereof .
SO go ahead epi .
TELL ME with all your heart that ONE MUST FIRST BELIEVE ON JESUS .

 

[Laurina]

any jesus that omits the fact one must FIRST bELIEVE ON HIM , IS NOT THE JESUS CHRIST of GOD epi .
We are not against holiness
we are against the preaching of attaining holiness without BELIEF on CHRIST .
Just as hyper grace seems to follow another jesus
B IG TIME so too do those who push inclusivism upon us . neither side is following JESUS CHRIST .
You seem so admant to teach about holiness , about picking up ones cross
ab out being dead to self , AND YET refuse to state ONE MUST FIRST BELIEVE ON JESUS
For it is BY HIM and IN H IM that we attain holiness , righteousness , salvation , justiication .
I know what inclusvisim teaches epi . And it does make void the fact ONE MUST BELIEVE ON JESUS .
And yet beleives it follows this SAVOIR OF THE WORLD . But not it dont .
FOR If it did it would never have made void BELEIF IN JESUS . all it is
is a FORM of godliness that simply denies the one true gospel , WHICH IS THE POWER OF GOD .
Having a form of godliness but DENYING the power thereof .
SO go ahead epi .
TELL ME with all your heart that ONE MUST FIRST BELIEVE ON JESUS .

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

 

[Lizbeth]

I will venture a guess why....

First of all, you don't understand his message (proven by when you say or assume what he believes), and your claims PROVE you don't have humility or meekness, or the fear of the Lord. That about sums it up!
Example: Look at ALL what @amigo de christo SAYS (falsely) what @Episkopos believes. It's ALL lies!! Yet, you "like" his post content. That shows that YOU actually DON'T understand what Epi is saying. You don't bother to correct Amigo with ALL his twisting of words/misunderstanding (if...), and lies, you blanket "like" when he rails against Epi FALSELY (with his lies). ...YET, you take your time to explain to me quote: "but for your sake I'll reply" (thank-you, by the way).

Secondly, proving you have no fear of the Lord, you have mocked Epikopos' testimony...wow!! That's pretty far...and you've yet to answer to God for that...

If there is misunderstanding anywhere, people are always free to clarify, no? And I'm wondering how you have decided that Amigo's posts are wrong if you don't understand them.

But I'm not interested in going down the long winding labyrinthian rabbit trails of the carnal mind anyhow. It makes my inner man's eyes glaze over..... zzzzzzz. Scriptural truth is not complicated, it is simple....written for children. Eyes to simply see, ears to simply hear.....when the LORD gives it. That is the humility and meekness God is after. Too much dissecting, splicing and dicing with the carnal mind ALWAYS leads astray.....and no wonder since it is ENMITY with God because of being from the Enemy serpent himself.......PRIDE. It goeth before a FALL.

All I know is if any professing Christian has a problem with affirming "Christ in us the hope of glory"........something is awfully wrong. There is a false foundation here of one's own righteousness. And if the foundation is wrong, you can safely bet the farm that the rest of it must be off kilter too.

 

[MostlyConfused]

It's missing the "the" in front of creation.

It works correctly and structurally either way. In fact, it has more oomph without a “the.” The less fillers the better when writing. I have a huge problem with the word “that.”
Either way, quite a sentence. Immediately calls to mind the verse in Revelation.

 

[Lizbeth]

Do you really think that God is looking for people who are not "against" holiness? You can't see the arrogance of your statements.

And it's sad to see that you only want to catch someone out in a petty technicality to try and win an argument. What does that say about a person? You already know very well what I'm trying to communicate so I won't bother explaining.

 

[MostlyConfused]

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

A bowl of alphabet soup is not that exact, but I get your point.

 

[Lizbeth]

any jesus that omits the fact one must FIRST bELIEVE ON HIM , IS NOT THE JESUS CHRIST of GOD epi .
We are not against holiness
we are against the preaching of attaining holiness without BELIEF on CHRIST .
Just as hyper grace seems to follow another jesus
B IG TIME so too do those who push inclusivism upon us . neither side is following JESUS CHRIST .
You seem so admant to teach about holiness , about picking up ones cross
ab out being dead to self , AND YET refuse to state ONE MUST FIRST BELIEVE ON JESUS
For it is BY HIM and IN H IM that we attain holiness , righteousness , salvation , justiication .
I know what inclusvisim teaches epi . And it does make void the fact ONE MUST BELIEVE ON JESUS .
And yet beleives it follows this SAVOIR OF THE WORLD . But not it dont .
FOR If it did it would never have made void BELEIF IN JESUS . all it is
is a FORM of godliness that simply denies the one true gospel , WHICH IS THE POWER OF GOD .
Having a form of godliness but DENYING the power thereof .
SO go ahead epi .
TELL ME with all your heart that ONE MUST FIRST BELIEVE ON JESUS .

I think we must not be among Christians here brother, if it they can't bring themselves to affirm the ABC's of the gospel.......faith in Jesus, and that it is Christ IN us who is the hope of glory. My oh my, it doesn't bode well unfortunately.