- Jan 26, 2017
- 10,585
- 8,430
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
How is it that man can open his eyes and accept that Christ's words: You have to drink my blood and eat my flesh have deep spiritual meaning? How is it that man can accept stone used to build the temple can also mean: men used to build the house of God. But then, man can see no further but rather reject any other spiritual meanings within scripture. How is it that man can see these things and accept, but reject that the Word of God clearly says that the high trees of Lebanon will be brought low (hewed down for the building of God's house)?
I have total respect for John MacArthur. Our list of pastors we will listen to in our home has dwindled down to him alone. His straight forwardness is appreciated, yet when he gives a sermon and says the blind man in Mark that Christ gives sight; only saw trees because of a lack of his sight being out of focus (blurred), needing then for Christ to lay hands on the man again to regain full perfect sight...I have to question: John, why do you refuse to see beyond the physical text?
Does man fear that to acknowledge the spiritual part of scripture would make the physical any less real? If I look outside my window and see the spiritual hand of God in His creation; IT does NOT make the physical any less real! After all, Christ was both: physical(touchable) and spiritual. Why does man remain so stiff and unreceptive in his interpretation? Is it because, to admit the obvious spiritual part of scripture would mean...NO book or study course or concordance could teach man what the Word of God says spiritually? Is it because man would have to admit the POWER of God and His Spirit alone...as Author and TEACHER? Is it because to acknowledge the spiritual, rather than the physical would mean we need new sight...NOT a dictionary? Would it acknowledge we need sight that is not of this world? Is it because to acknowledge the spirit within every word spoken by God would make man question whether or not he has been given new sight?
Mark 8:22-25: Christ DID NOT lack power to heal the blind man the first time. The blind man did not see trees because his vision was blurred and had not fully come into focus, which called for Christ to make a second attempt to heal the man. There is great spiritual significance within this text. First, Christ took the man outside of the town: set apart, without, same as with the lepers in the old testament, and the woman unclean from her menstrual(another healing Christ demonstrated through the healing of the woman with an issue of blood).
I ask you to refer to the book of Leviticus to find out why Jesus spit on the mans eyes.
First the man was healed spiritually: and he saw men as trees, walking. (see the countless verses added at the end of this post) THE TREES OF LEBANON: VERY significant! Another touch; Jesus heals the mans sight physically. Two touches given in an odd passage that clearly demonstrates the complete fullness and perfectness( near sight and far sight given) to the blind man...it does not demonstrate Jesus' lack of power to heal the first time He touched the man.
Mark 8:22-25 [22] And he cometh to Bethsaida; and they bring a blind man unto him, and besought him to touch him. [23] And he took the blind man by the hand, and led him out of the town; and when he had spit on his eyes, and put his hands upon him, he asked him if he saw ought. [24] And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking. [25] After that he put his hands again upon his eyes, and made him look up: and he was restored, and saw every man clearly.
You do not have to be smart to understand God's word. You do not have to be a scholar. You do not have to know Hebrew, or Greek. You do not have to know Jewish tradition. ALL you need is the Holy Spirit given by God to teach those that are His. This takes it out of mans hands and puts it in Gods alone. God gives sight.
Physical sight.
And Spiritual sight.
I have total respect for John MacArthur. Our list of pastors we will listen to in our home has dwindled down to him alone. His straight forwardness is appreciated, yet when he gives a sermon and says the blind man in Mark that Christ gives sight; only saw trees because of a lack of his sight being out of focus (blurred), needing then for Christ to lay hands on the man again to regain full perfect sight...I have to question: John, why do you refuse to see beyond the physical text?
Does man fear that to acknowledge the spiritual part of scripture would make the physical any less real? If I look outside my window and see the spiritual hand of God in His creation; IT does NOT make the physical any less real! After all, Christ was both: physical(touchable) and spiritual. Why does man remain so stiff and unreceptive in his interpretation? Is it because, to admit the obvious spiritual part of scripture would mean...NO book or study course or concordance could teach man what the Word of God says spiritually? Is it because man would have to admit the POWER of God and His Spirit alone...as Author and TEACHER? Is it because to acknowledge the spiritual, rather than the physical would mean we need new sight...NOT a dictionary? Would it acknowledge we need sight that is not of this world? Is it because to acknowledge the spirit within every word spoken by God would make man question whether or not he has been given new sight?
Mark 8:22-25: Christ DID NOT lack power to heal the blind man the first time. The blind man did not see trees because his vision was blurred and had not fully come into focus, which called for Christ to make a second attempt to heal the man. There is great spiritual significance within this text. First, Christ took the man outside of the town: set apart, without, same as with the lepers in the old testament, and the woman unclean from her menstrual(another healing Christ demonstrated through the healing of the woman with an issue of blood).
I ask you to refer to the book of Leviticus to find out why Jesus spit on the mans eyes.
First the man was healed spiritually: and he saw men as trees, walking. (see the countless verses added at the end of this post) THE TREES OF LEBANON: VERY significant! Another touch; Jesus heals the mans sight physically. Two touches given in an odd passage that clearly demonstrates the complete fullness and perfectness( near sight and far sight given) to the blind man...it does not demonstrate Jesus' lack of power to heal the first time He touched the man.
Mark 8:22-25 [22] And he cometh to Bethsaida; and they bring a blind man unto him, and besought him to touch him. [23] And he took the blind man by the hand, and led him out of the town; and when he had spit on his eyes, and put his hands upon him, he asked him if he saw ought. [24] And he looked up, and said, I see men as trees, walking. [25] After that he put his hands again upon his eyes, and made him look up: and he was restored, and saw every man clearly.
You do not have to be smart to understand God's word. You do not have to be a scholar. You do not have to know Hebrew, or Greek. You do not have to know Jewish tradition. ALL you need is the Holy Spirit given by God to teach those that are His. This takes it out of mans hands and puts it in Gods alone. God gives sight.
Physical sight.
And Spiritual sight.
Last edited: