SCOTUS , who vacated Roe V. Wade just approved nationwide access to abortion pill. By mail, no Dr. visit

[BlessedPeace]

SCOTUS Just Made a Final Decision About Abortion Pill Access

This all started a year ago when two different judges gave opposing rulings on abortion medications. Here's everything that's happened since then.

www.yahoo.com

Makes no sense. Vacate national access to abortion surgery, only later to approve non-surgical abortion pill.

 

[Jack]

SCOTUS Just Made a Final Decision About Abortion Pill Access

This all started a year ago when two different judges gave opposing rulings on abortion medications. Here's everything that's happened since then.

www.yahoo.com

Makes no sense. Vacate national access to abortion surgery, only later to approve non-surgical abortion pill.

And God knows the side effects! Big Pharma probably does too tho. They don't care about lives.

 

[BlessedPeace]

And God knows the side effects! Big Pharma probably does too tho. They don't care about lives.

It's just a continuation of the Eugenics protocols the shadow governors of the world are pushing.

In abortion clinics they have special containment procedures for medical waste.

These consumers of the abortion pill have to dispose of their "choice" themselves.

There's a message. Future aborted generations relegated to medwaste. Now, they're just going to be garbage.

 

[Chains Broken]

The Fifth Amendment says that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

This ruling allows people to be deprived of life without due process of law and is unconstitutional.

 

[BlessedPeace]

The Fifth Amendment says that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

This ruling allows people to be deprived of life without due process of law and is unconstitutional.

This pill is available for women who are up to 10 weeks pregnant.

 

[bluedragon]

The women who demand an abortion will get them done. As long as the taxpayer has no skin in the game ....It's their sin ...

 

[Ziggy]

The Fifth Amendment says that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

This ruling allows people to be deprived of life without due process of law and is unconstitutional.

Their argument is, is that it isn't a person until it is breathing on it's own.
I don't believe any government entity should dictate or mandate one way or the other.
I believe the decision is between the woman, the doctor, and her conscience.
It shouldn't be just about a choice of what a woman wants to do with her body, it should be based on medical decisions for the life of the mother or the child.
If you choose to take a pill, the person should be fully informed of any side effects or consequences that can come about.
And only then by consent.
I was 13 when I got pregnant. I understand the fear of facing your parents and believing they will disown you or be ashamed of you.
But there are other choices. I had the choice to give it up for adoption or my parents agreed to help me raise it.
It took me 8 months to decide but I chose the latter.
And if I had chosen adoption I would not be a grandmother today.
At no other time in my life have I had the opportunity of pregnancy. It was a one time offer and I took it, by the grace of God.

I was put on birth control pills after having the baby and I don't know if that is the cause for my not ever getting pregnant again even after 2 marriages. I was on them for one year and they made me sick to my stomach so I stopped taking them.

But the argument remains as far as the constitution goes, when does life begin and that "person" have rights?
I believe at conception, but that's my opinion.

Hugs

 

[bluedragon]

Their argument is, is that it isn't a person until it is breathing on it's own.
I don't believe any government entity should dictate or mandate one way or the other.
I believe the decision is between the woman, the doctor, and her conscience.
It shouldn't be just about a choice of what a woman wants to do with her body, it should be based on medical decisions for the life of the mother or the child.
If you choose to take a pill, the person should be fully informed of any side effects or consequences that can come about.
And only then by consent.
I was 13 when I got pregnant. I understand the fear of facing your parents and believing they will disown you or be ashamed of you.
But there are other choices. I had the choice to give it up for adoption or my parents agreed to help me raise it.
It took me 8 months to decide but I chose the latter.
And if I had chosen adoption I would not be a grandmother today.
At no other time in my life have I had the opportunity of pregnancy. It was a one time offer and I took it, by the grace of God.

I was put on birth control pills after having the baby and I don't know if that is the cause for my not ever getting pregnant again even after 2 marriages. I was on them for one year and they made me sick to my stomach so I stopped taking them.

But the argument remains as far as the constitution goes, when does life begin and that "person" have rights?
I believe at conception, but that's my opinion.

Hugs

I believe that as well. I'll advise where appropriate, but will not force a position .....I was at a baseball practice when a kid came up and told me about my daughter. I never expected her to fall victim ....She had been sexually molested by a neighbor. I didn't expect her to ever fall. I supported her all the way through the trial. She knew I could be trusted. All her girlfriends were having sex .....she fell off the cliff. It just happened to be Daughter and Dad's night out. We went to eat where she chose to go. I asked "So what happened today?" "Nothing much." We could read each other like a book. "Who told you?" "Does that matter or does my approach matter?" "Your approach." "You realize, mom is going to throw things, yell and scream and beat her head against the wall? I'll take care of all that. She'll mad at us both."
'but now you have a dilemma to address. I would break things off with the bragging rights of the immature. I's the future you have to deal with now. Each boy you meet, somehow will see you as an easy mark. You have to address that and keep in mind ......your Father supports you ....send them to me ....."

 

[Ronald Nolette]

SCOTUS Just Made a Final Decision About Abortion Pill Access

This all started a year ago when two different judges gave opposing rulings on abortion medications. Here's everything that's happened since then.

www.yahoo.com

Makes no sense. Vacate national access to abortion surgery, only later to approve non-surgical abortion pill.

That is why we as followers of Jesus, must trust in the Lord and not laws and policies of human govt.

 

[BlessedPeace]

Now,birth control can be had with no Doctor appointment and delivered by mail.

 

[Rockerduck]

The Supreme Court has no Christians on it. I thought Clarence Thomas was for a while, but he is just very conservative. So, it shouldn't surprise us with some rulings.

 

[BlessedPeace]

The Supreme Court has no Christians on it. I thought Clarence Thomas was for a while, but he is just very conservative. So, it shouldn't surprise us with some rulings.

6 of the 9 are practicing Catholics.

6 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices are Catholic — Here’s a Closer Look

The Catholics on the nation’s highest court include Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

www.ncregister.com

 

[Rockerduck]

6 of the 9 are practicing Catholics.

6 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices are Catholic — Here’s a Closer Look

The Catholics on the nation’s highest court include Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

www.ncregister.com

They are not Christians, just because they go to a Catholic church like Biden does. I've heard them all speak and never heard a "praise the Lord" or "thank you Jesus", out of them.

 

[BlessedPeace]

They are not Christians, just because they go to a Catholic church like Biden does. I've heard them all speak and never heard a "praise the Lord" or "thank you Jesus", out of them.

When I ask the Catholics I know if they are Christian they state they are Catholic.

 

[Rockerduck]

When I ask the Catholics I know if they are Christian they state they are Catholic.

That happens to me too.

 

[Bob]

Thank you all for your posts.

Although this is a sad decision, remember that our Constitution is not intended to be a document pertaining to morals, but rather establish a framework for laws: secular laws. Thus, Roe v. Wade was vacated not so new lives would be saved, but because it was not a right stated in the Constitution.

The abortion pill was likely (I am speculating) given the okay after our government gave the Court assurance that it was not medically harmful to a woman, end of story. In other words, to the Court, this is just another medication.

Yes, we weep for all of the lives terminated for selfishness.

As some of you have pointed out, it is up to the people of God, with God’s help, to turn people to God, so that all will know the sanctity of His precious creation, life.

Peace and blessings.

 

[BlessedPeace]

This country was not intended to be a Theocracy. Yet, we are turning into something by law that I genuinely don't believe the forefathers could ever imagine.

 

[Wrangler]

SCOTUS Just Made a Final Decision About Abortion Pill Access

This all started a year ago when two different judges gave opposing rulings on abortion medications. Here's everything that's happened since then.

www.yahoo.com

Makes no sense. Vacate national access to abortion surgery, only later to approve non-surgical abortion pill.

It makes sense from the principle of federalism.

 

[BlessedPeace]

That's America.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-3/ALDE_00000032/

 

[MorningDance13]

SCOTUS Just Made a Final Decision About Abortion Pill Access

This all started a year ago when two different judges gave opposing rulings on abortion medications. Here's everything that's happened since then.

www.yahoo.com

Makes no sense. Vacate national access to abortion surgery, only later to approve non-surgical abortion pill.

My understanding is that the reason they vacated it is not so much because they believe that abortion is wrong and should not be legal but rather because of the way the whole thing was done meaning like the wording of the issue brought before the court and whether it should have been brought to SCOTUS at all or someplace else for instances.‍