- Aug 10, 2012
- 6,106
- 7,509
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
Thank you for the reply GTW27Blessings in Christ Jesus lforrest! I personally do not choose to be spiritual, I am just one with The Lord. I know the answer you are looking for can be found in a writing by watchman nee. I could have brought it here for your answer but I decided not to. And this is the reason why. One day at work I was talking to a coworker who happened to be a minister. And he asked me if I wanted to read this book he had in his hand. It was a book by watchman nee. And I told him I did not want to read that book because The Lord was not in it. I think he got a little offended and he said, Are you saying that watchman nee is not a Christian? And I said, I did not say that, I said that The Lord is not in that book, but I have a book that The Lord is in. And that I do read. I know this answer will not be popular, but I did read the answer to your question and I did not find wisdom in it. The Lord is so much more than that, and not in that book. Being soulish brings glory to self and being spiritual brings Glory to God. I can only bring Glory to God no matter what condition I am in. Blessings.
Watchman nee did bring a good parable to light, which concerns this John 12:24: "Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds." This points to mortification of the flesh, which I had been thinking about today.
So to take a shot at answering my question: people choose this world and temporary things over the Kingdom and righteousness.
I was aiming at finding a answer to why some believe a certain doctrine, which deceives with an underlying assumption about what a loving God wouldn't do. And determine how that doctrine appeals to the soulishness of the outer man. One could assume it is the flesh trying to save itself, by diminishing the consequences of sin, but it seems a bit far fetched to apply agency to the flesh.