Patrick1966
Well-Known Member
The idea of Marxism stems from envy and rebellion.
FWIW, it's my understanding that Marx was a Satanist.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The idea of Marxism stems from envy and rebellion.
Unnatural affection comes from a reprobate mind. God hands us over to it when we forget about him and worship the creation over the creator.
1 Corinthians 5:5I believe he does so for their own spiritual development.
1 Corinthians 5:5
Hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord.
If people falling over dead was counted as spiritual development I don't suppose Christianity would win many converts.
1 Corinthians 5:5
Hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord.
If people falling over dead was counted as spiritual development I don't suppose Christianity would win many converts.
Im thinking it might have nothing to do with the spiritual growth of ones who are handed over, but with the laws in heaven.What do you believe is God's purpose in handing them over to a reprobate mind?
Im thinking it might have nothing to do with the spiritual growth of ones who are handed over, but with the laws in heaven.
It seems to me that there is an unnamed and undiscovered art in this world.
Spiritual discernment can be applied to any idea. And from that the spirit or spirits behind it exposed. All the way down to the roots. Sort of like an etymology.
An example that is probably not correct or complete, but will give you an idea of what I'm on about:
The idea of Marxism stems from envy and rebellion. Envy comes from pride and doubt. Rebellion, pride, and doubt all come directly from Satan.
So by breaking down an idea to it's spiritual roots we can form insights about it. Insights about how to categorize it, and how to attack or defend against it.
Well, I believe that ALL are saved in the end and I also believe that there is purpose to everything God does. I believe Earthly experiences are collectively edifying to all of mankind in the hereafter.
tell that to pope francis and the all inclusive social gospel .I am not sure where you're going with this. Here are good definitions of Marxism: a) one of the primary principles of Marxism is that the modes of production and the relationships of exchange form the base of society, i.e., its primary features and b) Marx condemned capitalism as a system that alienates the masses. His reasoning was as follows: although workers produce things for the market, market forces, not workers, control things. People are required to work for capitalists who have full control over the means of production and maintain power in the workplace."
I don't see envy and rebellion here.
I believe that people are damned but that it is restorative in addition to being punitive for the purpose of cleansing the souls. Thereafter, they join the rest of us.But what does "the day of the Lord" bring? It brings the Judgement. Which would not come if "ALL are saved."
So...you believe that "destroy" (with holy fire) does not actually mean destroy??I believe that people are damned but that it is restorative in addition to being punitive for the purpose of cleansing the souls. Thereafter, they join the rest of us.
I don't believe that God eternally damns his children.So...you believe that "destroy" (with holy fire) does not actually mean destroy??
He doesn't. But what you are apparently not understanding, is that He only has one child, One begotten. In other words, just as it has been written from the beginning, you are only looking at an "image" the One unfolding into the many. No actual children are harmed.I don't believe that God eternally damns his children.
I presume that is referring to a rapture.This is what Jesus meant when He said "two shall be in a field and on shall be taken and the other left." It is only those who are born out of the image and into God who remain--while the "image" is "destroyed."
One must understand the context of 1 Timothy 4:10. "All people" is all "in Christ"--not all "images" who were not born out of the image world and into God.I presume that is referring to a rapture.
Paul said that Jesus is the savior of ALL mankind. There are numerous other verses that essentially say the same thing.
1 Timothy 4:10 esv
For to this end we toil and strive, because we have our hope set on the living God, who is the Savior of all people, especially of those who believe.
One must understand the context of 1 Timothy 4:10. "All people" is all "in Christ"--not all "images" who were not born out of the image world and into God.
Regardless, to be convinced only by the part the scriptures that seem to support your belief, does not make void those that don't, but emphatically show a dividing line between the saved and the unsaved. Both include numerous passages, and you have not reconciled them, but only picked what is to your liking. That's good of you--God likes that side best too. But that is not all there is.
They took GOD out of the equation . They made GOVT the GOD . much like what i am seeing going onThe problem with the Soviet Union as I was told was that they had a good idea but it was destined to fail. They wanted everyone to end up with the same wage like the church was established in the bible. But what ended up happening was that every important person had the large house on the hill and all the little people ended up in apartments.
Applying your spiritual idea makes me think of selfishness. Something I struggle with. It is spiritually against God. When I act in a selfless way I feel the Lords spirit and it is wonderful. Perhaps the selfishness got hold of the Soviet Union?
The problem lies in MAN Himself devin . and when ungodly men create a system , rest assured no matter how good it seems ,The problem with the Soviet Union as I was told was that they had a good idea but it was destined to fail. They wanted everyone to end up with the same wage like the church was established in the bible. But what ended up happening was that every important person had the large house on the hill and all the little people ended up in apartments.
Applying your spiritual idea makes me think of selfishness. Something I struggle with. It is spiritually against God. When I act in a selfless way I feel the Lords spirit and it is wonderful. Perhaps the selfishness got hold of the Soviet Union?