rebuilder 454
Well-Known Member
You can't have it both ways.[Galatians 1:6 KJV] "I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:"
[Galatians 1:7 KJV] "Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ."
[Galatians 1:8 KJV] "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed."...................Paul didnt accurse Jesus or Peter. Jesus was preaching the gospel of the kingdom in which the millennial kingdom promised to Israel was at hand, Peter was preaching the kingdom as well which included keeping the law to enter it. Paul was accursing "some that trouble you" who were preaching "another gospel"
Wouldn't be more productive to ask me to explain why Paul wasn't accursing Jesus and Peter instead of being inflammatory?
It is You that says Peter, James, John, and Jesus preached a different gospel.
Paul was clear and you readily point out the horror of all the Apostles false gospel, save Paul.
Why call others inflammatory for pointing out your error that is inflammatory?