God made physical Israel and He will fulfill His purpose of ruling the nations through them on the earth.Yes....my meaning was that the prophecies are ABOUT "the Israel of God", not earthly Israel per se, to be more precise. :)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God made physical Israel and He will fulfill His purpose of ruling the nations through them on the earth.Yes....my meaning was that the prophecies are ABOUT "the Israel of God", not earthly Israel per se, to be more precise. :)
Yes the city is AS, AS a symbol of a bride because of the glory of God. There is no marriage. It is symbolic of God connecting the spiritual and physical realms. The city comes down out of the invisible realm to the physical realm and is the connecting of the two.He collectively only has one bride, "the Israel of God" but it is made up of many souls......the city that comes down prepared as a bride, of course is made up of many citizens.
Where are we called the Israel of God, please?Israel is called "the church in the wilderness" brother. And the church is called "the Israel of God."
Galatians 6:16And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.Where are we called the Israel of God, please?
Notice the word AND. That reveals two groups.Galatians 6:16And as for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.
Well, we disagree : the content of the letter, to me, dictates the meaning of "Israel of God". In other words, Paul doesn't start a new argument, or raise a new term ("Israel of God"), without treating it, because all the preceding material already explains what he means. He has already called the Galatians "Isaac" (Gal 4:21-31), for instance, and, here, he is capping his lambasting of the Judaizing false Jewish Christians off by saying "They aren't even the Israel of God, God's people, where God's presence dwells in their midst (Ex 33:15)--you are, so don't ever let them put you down, or make you feel 'less than', just because you aren't circumcising, etc. YOU are Israel, don't worry about belonging in their Israel."Notice the word AND. That reveals two groups.
1. For in Christ. (Gal. 6: 15) Those in the Body of Christ.
2. Israel of God. (Gal. 6: 16) Those of the physical nation of Israel who turned to God.
`I say then, has God cast away His people? Certainly not! ...God has not cast away His people who, He foreknew....For I do not desire brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved...` (Rom. 11: 1 & 2, 25 & 26)Well, we disagree : the content of the letter, to me, dictates the meaning of "Israel of God". In other words, Paul doesn't start a new argument, or raise a new term ("Israel of God"), without treating it, because all the preceding material already explains what he means. He has already called the Galatians "Isaac" (Gal 4:21-31), for instance, and, here, he is capping his lambasting of the Judaizing false Jewish Christians off by saying "They aren't even the Israel of God, God's people, where God's presence dwells in their midst (Ex 33:15)--you are, so don't ever let them put you down, or make you feel 'less than', just because you aren't circumcising, etc. YOU are Israel, don't worry about belonging in their Israel."
The believers in the remnant had faith in Jesus ............The remnant was still operating during Paul's ministry and he had helpers from among them.........he states they were in Christ before me.................[Rom 16:7 KJV] 7 Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.1. You're saying that Peter and the other Jewish believers he preached to are "the remnant of Israel", and, therefore, are not "the body of Christ"? That's odd, since, when Paul was persecuting them, Jesus said, "Why are you persecuting ME?"
Not sure of the point of this but I would say yes. Did Peter abide "in Christ"?
Oops : the REASON God has not cast off His people is because He has preserved a remnant. Why did you leave that part out?`I say then, has God cast away His people? Certainly not! ...God has not cast away His people who, He foreknew....For I do not desire brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved...` (Rom. 11: 1 & 2, 25 & 26)
Well, if Peter was abiding in Christ, how is Peter not considered to be in the body of Christ? LOL!Not sure of the point of this but I would say yes
So, if the remnant of Israel is "in Christ", why are they not "the body of Christ"?The believers in the remnant had faith in Jesus ............The remnant was still operating during Paul's ministry and he had helpers from among them.........he states they were in Christ before me.................[Rom 16:7 KJV] 7 Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.
Of course Jesus would say Paul was persecuting him since the church of God, the remnant of Israel, was in Christ
Actually it is only one body . it consists of believing in JESUS jews and gentiles .Notice the word AND. That reveals two groups.
1. For in Christ. (Gal. 6: 15) Those in the Body of Christ.
2. Israel of God. (Gal. 6: 16) Those of the physical nation of Israel who turned to God.
Any souls who were righteous and God fearing before Christ was crucified (eg, some are written about in the bible such as Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Ruth, Moses, Joshua, prophets etc) are included in this where it says: "they without us would not be made perfect". Jesus descended into the place of the dead and preached the gospel to these and they were resurrected when he was...to my understanding that was the first resurrection which we who believe have a part in. The earlier saints are all included in Christ, with the church that is alive.There were millions of people all before Christ who did not know of Him. And God has a purpose for them, but they are not in the Body which was started when Christ ascended to the Father. God did not make physical Israel and expect fallen man to save themselves. God has a purpose for physical Israel - to rule the nations of the world with Christ ruling through them.
You already know the answer my friend . because As the scrips make real clearSo, if the remnant of Israel is "in Christ", why are they not "the body of Christ"?
What do you think it means to be "in Christ"? They are mystically unified with the body of Christ, partaking in both His death and resurrection.
And therein lies the KEY sister .Any souls who were righteous and God fearing before Christ was crucified (eg, some are written about in the bible such as Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Ruth, Moses, Joshua, prophets etc) are included in this where it says: "they without us would not be made perfect". Jesus descended into the place of the dead and preached the gospel to these and they were resurrected when he was...to my understanding that was the first resurrection which we who believe have a part in. The earlier saints are all included in Christ, with the church that is alive.
Sister we have been taught wrong. Jesus Christ is ruling and reigning now and His people are reigning with Him as more than conquerors through Him. This age of grace now is the "1000" year reign of Christ and it is by faith not by sight...remember Jesus said His kingdom is not of this world, it comes not with our careful observation. And every time a soul is saved or someone is healed, or a demon cast out, or miracle of any kind, we see evidence of His kingdom rule being enforced. Jesus told the religious leaders in Luke 11:20 , "If I by the finger of God cast out devils then no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you". And read 2Peter 3 carefully with fresh eyes....the thousand years is the time of longsuffering which we are to account as salvation....the time of grace to get souls saved....the world as it is will burn up upon His return in wrath. And in 1 Corinthians 15 it says Jesus will turn the kingdom back over to the Father when He returns, so He will not be ruling and reigning as such any more after that but God will be all in all. It's very important that we look at Rev through the lens of the scriptures that came before it, rather than trying to work backwards and wrest the earlier scrips to try to force them to fit what we have thought Rev was saying. The current popular understanding of Rev contradicts so many other scriptures so it can't be right.
The coming down from heaven itself is symbolic. The city is heavenly Zion, the kingdom of God and Christ, and we were all "born in her" when we came to faith. Zion came down to live in our hearts as it were.Yes the city is AS, AS a symbol of a bride because of the glory of God. There is no marriage. It is symbolic of God connecting the spiritual and physical realms. The city comes down out of the invisible realm to the physical realm and is the connecting of the two.
I dont think Paul was in the remnant......when Christ came in his earthly ministry Israel had to believe on his name that he was Christ, the Son of God......Paul rejected this and persecuted those who did and was not in the believing remnantWhy is Paul, who is of "the remnant of Israel", part of "the body of Christ"--or do you dispute that?
Both the remnant of Israel and the body of Christ believers are in ChristWouldn't it be fair to say that those who are "in Christ" are "the body of Christ"?
When many read the scrips , the propheciesThe coming down from heaven itself is symbolic. The city is heavenly Zion, the kingdom of God and Christ, and we were all "born in her" when we came to faith. Zion came down to live in our hearts as it were.
The idea of an earthly utopia is one thing that tripped up the religious leaders of Jesus' day...they were expecting an earthly messiah/king to rule over an utopian earth. Jesus was CORRECTING that wrong belief when He told them His kingdom is not of this world and comes not with careful observation that we may say lo here it is, or there, but the kingdom (Zion) is within/among us.