Tithing is in the old testament and was designed to feed the Levite tribe because that particular tribe wasn't to inherent any land but to serve in the priesthood. It was always food, never money.
The New Testament Church did not tithe, but gave freely to one another until no one had a need. The Lord Jesus, Paul, and the other apostles and disciples did not receive money for their ministry. They were entitled to food and clothing as they went, but Paul denied himself this right in order to not be a burden on the people he ministered to and taught those serving with him to do the same.
You cannot serve God and money. The church business model of the day creates a perverse incentive against pastors preaching the truth straight from the Bible.
Tithing as mandatory is indeed not in the NT. We are to give what we are able and from a cheerful heart. Believe it or not, there are a lot of Christians who want to tithe. I've been told that their reason is due to Abraham's tithe who was not under the law. He chose to. I suppose they feel convicted in some way from that. Tithing was complicated in the OT- and not just about money.
I do have a problem with any pastor who teaches tithing as mandatory- it's good thing that many do not teach that. When you were in the Orthodox church- did they teach tithing? I didn't think they did but who knows...
I used to think that asking for money was a bad sign of a greedy false teacher- but Paul asked for donations quite a bit in his letters and he also encouraged them to give all the more. I would never take that as Paul being greedy- just that money is necessary. As far as the pastor taking a FT secular job- I would say that's optional. Paul
chose to work and it's very clear- that it was not full time. Paul also chose not to marry- that doesn't mean he couldn't. There is nothing wrong with paying the lead pastor or two a salary. If that church chooses to do that- why begrudge them? It's not as if pastoring a church isn't working! I can't imagine all that job entails.. I've seen many pastor's wives working plenty serving the church all week long and without pay- so the pay is for both.
You seem opposed to church buildings- while I agree they never need to be fancy, but they do need electricity and plumbing, heating and cooling- and a kitchen etc. We can not be exactly like the earliest church- nor do we have to be- - If they could have afforded a separate structure open to the public early on they would have- the church was very young and growing. We need to be careful about looking at the externals only- the heart is what matters. There are still many modest community churches around.
If we still
only had home fellowships which I don't begrudge- but those make us less visible to the seeking and the lost needy. It also can put a real burden on the person whose home the meeting is in. A separate building also allows for children to come and learn and play together.
I am very familiar with the Amish- they meet in homes- every OTHER Sunday.
The walls in their homes are built,
so that they can remove the walls-- in order to make room for everyone. A lot has to be done to allow for this- all of the furniture has to be moved out- and seating for all brought in. Tables are set up for a common meal- a lot of food prep etc.. Once it is over it all has to be done in reverse. They take turns doing this. No wonder they meet every other week.
It just makes sense for communities to have separate structures to gather in.
Paying the pastor if done out of love is not wrong! It affords him more time to be an effective pastor rather than being concerned about a job, family
and the people.
I do not think it's necessary to pay a FT salary to all other positions in the church - other than a f/t secretary.
Deacons/elders usually are not paid as far as I have seen. Some might be, but I don't see the need- but the lead pastor- sure ,why not.
God isn't looking down at us making sure that we are identical in every way to the earliest church. He looks at our hearts.
A hard working devoted pastor taking a pay from his congregation is not a sin. He earns it.