You miss the point. Your source suggested that a cure for women is the solution, and I would observe that it's not the women who are the problem. It's the homosexuals who transmit the greater portion of the virus, and are the greater problem. As such, curing women is an insignificant contributor.
Secondly, you suggest that there is no penalty for sin, which I would equally disagree. As ~proof~, I would suggest that whatever the ~sin~ the penalty is a degree of death. And Isaiah cites that during the Millennial Kingdom that without the tempter, we shall be less susceptible to that penalty:
Isaiah 65:20
[sup]20[/sup] ... the one who dies at a hundred
will be thought a mere child;
the one who fails to reach a hundred
will be considered accursed.
And so it is not "superstition" that when we sin, there is a penalty, -- be it in the form of general deterioration of our mortal bodies or a specific contagion. And in fact, I would argue that it is superstitious to deny that if an individual did not participate in such a life style (being homosexuals exchanging body fluids, or liver failure due to drinking, or lung failure due to smoking), none the those ailments would occur without those choices. For GOD did not simply suggest to the residents of Sodom that they are ~bad~, but HE destroyed them and those who yearned for that society (i.e., Lot's wife).
So it's clearly within the realm of GOD to bring destruction in other venues as HIS hand is not shortened by our preferences.
BibleScribe