What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
We see in Romans 3, the first question of how it profits to have been a natural Jew born under the law, even though neither Jew nor Gentile is justified by Christ without faith.
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
We see in Romans 4, the question pertaining to Abraham himself after the flesh.
The context of these two chapters therefore pertains to the flesh, and so works of the flesh as by law, such as outward circumcision.
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
No outward deed of the law justifies any man, including Abraham, as though any man could boast by not breaking the law and the covenant, such as by not being circumcised in the flesh on the 8th day according to the law.
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
We see in James 1-2 however, that the context is that of faith and works of faith, which Abraham is the father of and called a Friend of God.
No man is justified by any obedient work of the flesh as by law, such as outward circumcision.
But the work of faith as by love, which was against the flesh in offering up his only son Isaac, is what justifies all men by faith: works of the law are of the flesh, but works of faith are against the flesh.
No man is justified by the deeds of the law in the flesh, but all men are justified by the works of faith that crucify the flesh for Jesus' sake.
We see in Romans 3, the first question of how it profits to have been a natural Jew born under the law, even though neither Jew nor Gentile is justified by Christ without faith.
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
We see in Romans 4, the question pertaining to Abraham himself after the flesh.
The context of these two chapters therefore pertains to the flesh, and so works of the flesh as by law, such as outward circumcision.
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
No outward deed of the law justifies any man, including Abraham, as though any man could boast by not breaking the law and the covenant, such as by not being circumcised in the flesh on the 8th day according to the law.
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
We see in James 1-2 however, that the context is that of faith and works of faith, which Abraham is the father of and called a Friend of God.
No man is justified by any obedient work of the flesh as by law, such as outward circumcision.
But the work of faith as by love, which was against the flesh in offering up his only son Isaac, is what justifies all men by faith: works of the law are of the flesh, but works of faith are against the flesh.
No man is justified by the deeds of the law in the flesh, but all men are justified by the works of faith that crucify the flesh for Jesus' sake.