The head of the The Episcopal Church (TEC) in the US remarked:
"Some have judged our smaller numbers as faithlessness but it may actually be the Spirit's way of pruning for greater fruitfulness."
(Link: http://www.christianpost.com/news/episcopal-leader-membership-losses-are-spirits-way-of-pruning-for-greater-fruitfulness-102573/)
Now, I am admittedly no fan of Bishop Schori, but her narrative is the same line I've heard from many Christians of varying denominations and persuasions. The quickest conservative to make a similar statement is Dr. Moore who will head the ERLC, of the Southern Baptists. He said that it was a "good thing" for the church to be facing the issues of relegation to minority status.
Now, are these two examples really good things? I understand the idea that we will suffer as Christians and that suffering may range from actual persecution (such as that of 1st and 2nd century Christians, among many others) all the way to suffering the loss of loved ones from the church which we all believe will save their souls. I also understand that a Christian is hopeful, by very definition. However, do we really buy the narrative that these are good things?
Even a cultural Christian was exposed to the teachings of the church, and a common set of moral beliefs and boundaries. Yet the church is now not even remotely present in the lives of many. Even if God is about to build something bigger for his church - do we say that this is all good?
Reality is that we are entering minority status with diminished influence. I am fine in acknowledging this. However, I am troubled with the notion that its in any way good. The remnant will always be the remnant, in good or bad.
"Some have judged our smaller numbers as faithlessness but it may actually be the Spirit's way of pruning for greater fruitfulness."
(Link: http://www.christianpost.com/news/episcopal-leader-membership-losses-are-spirits-way-of-pruning-for-greater-fruitfulness-102573/)
Now, I am admittedly no fan of Bishop Schori, but her narrative is the same line I've heard from many Christians of varying denominations and persuasions. The quickest conservative to make a similar statement is Dr. Moore who will head the ERLC, of the Southern Baptists. He said that it was a "good thing" for the church to be facing the issues of relegation to minority status.
Now, are these two examples really good things? I understand the idea that we will suffer as Christians and that suffering may range from actual persecution (such as that of 1st and 2nd century Christians, among many others) all the way to suffering the loss of loved ones from the church which we all believe will save their souls. I also understand that a Christian is hopeful, by very definition. However, do we really buy the narrative that these are good things?
Even a cultural Christian was exposed to the teachings of the church, and a common set of moral beliefs and boundaries. Yet the church is now not even remotely present in the lives of many. Even if God is about to build something bigger for his church - do we say that this is all good?
Reality is that we are entering minority status with diminished influence. I am fine in acknowledging this. However, I am troubled with the notion that its in any way good. The remnant will always be the remnant, in good or bad.